Skip to main content

Recent Ergonomic Interventions and Evaluations on Laptop, Smartphones and Desktop Computer Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Industrial Automation and Smart Manufacturing

Abstract

The use of computers has been rapidly rising over the recent decade. In the recent past along with the usage of desktops, laptops and smartphones are widely used in most of the offices. With the advancement in technology in smartphones, people spend a lot of time using a smartphone for the basic need of networking. It was noticed that laptops and smartphones users tend to attain incorrect postures when compared with desktop users. It is the prime concern for the organizations to improve their work environment in order to optimize the health, safety, comfort and effectiveness of their employees. This paper is aimed to study the ergonomic interventions carried out to reduce pain and to improve the posture while working on desktop, laptops and smartphones. The ergonomic evaluation methods to assess the computer workstations are also laid out. This review will be helpful for the users to adjust their workstation correctly and designers to design the workstation to include better usability feature as per ergonomic guidelines during laptop, smartphone and desktop usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Smith S, Salaway G, Borreson Caruso J (2009) The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. In: Research study, vol 6. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang C, Amick B, Menedez CC, Robertson M, del Pino RJ, Dinnerlein JT (2008) Where and how college students use their laptop computers. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 52nd annual meeting, pp 629–633

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess-Limerick R, Plooy A, Ankrum DR (1998) The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. Clin Biomech 13(8):584–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerr F, Marcus M, Monteilh C (2004) Epidemiology of musculoskeletal disorders among computer users: lesson learned from the role of posture and keyboard use. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ANSI/HFES (2007) Human factors engineering of computer workstations (ANSI/HFES 100-2007). Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  6. STATISTA 2018. Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2014 to 2020 (in billions). Homepage: https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide

  7. Berolo S, Wells RP, Amick BC 3rd (2011) Musculoskeletal symptoms among mobile hand-held device users and their relationship to device use: a preliminary study in a Canadian university population. Appl Ergon 42(2):371–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. You D, Smith AH, Rempel D (2014) Meta-Analysis: Association between Wrist Posture and Carpal Tunnel syndrome among workers. Safety and Health at work 5, 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  9. Whoo HC, White P, Lai C (2017) Ergonomics standards and guidelines for computer workstation design and the impact on user’s health—a review. Ergonomics 59(3):464–475

    Google Scholar 

  10. Agarwal S, Rajajeyakumar (2018) Early diagnosis and prevention of repetitive strain injury induced carpal tunnel syndrome among computer users. Clin Exp Psychol 4(1):188

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rafael M, Tatiana G (2007) A survey of ergonomic issues associated with a university laptop program. J Educ Human Dev 1(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  12. Price J, Dowell W (1998) Laptop configurations in offices: effects on posture and discomfort. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 42nd annual meeting, pp 629–633

    Google Scholar 

  13. Straker L, Jones KJ, Miller J (1997) A comparison of the postures assumed when using laptop computers and desktop computers. Appl Ergon 28:263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sommerich CM, Starr H, Smith CA, Shivers C (2002) Effects of notebook computer configuration and task on user biomechanics, productivity, and comfort. Int J Ind Ergon 30:7–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seghers J, Jochem A, Spaepen A (2003) Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings. Ergonomics 46:714–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. IASP (2009) International association for the study of pain

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korhonen T, Ketola R, Toivonen R, Luukkonen R, Hakkanen M, Viikari-Juntura E (2003) Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units. Occup Environ Med 60(7):475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cagnie B, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, De Loose V, Cambier D (2007) Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among office workers: a cross sectional study. Eur Spine J 16(5):679–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Asundi K, Odell D, Luce A, Dennerlein JT (2012) Changes in posture through the use of simple inclines with notebook computers placed on a standard desk. Appl Ergon 400–407

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R, Papalia S (2014) The effect of upper extremity support on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during keyboard use. Appl Ergon 35(3):285–292

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shokri S, Ghalenoei M, Taban E, Ahmadi O, Kouhnavard B (2015) Evaluation of prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among students using portable computer in faculty of health. Qazvin University of Medical Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mowatt L, Gordon C, Babu A, Santosh R, Jones T (2017) To determine the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) and ergonomic practices among students in the Faculty of Medical Sciences at The University of the West Indies (UWI), Jamaica

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gustafsson E, Johnson PW, Hagberg M (2010) Thumb postures & physical loads during mobile phone use—a comparison of young adults with and without musculoskeletal symptoms. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20(1):127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Namwongsa S, Puntumetakul R, Neubert MS, Chaiklieng S, Boucaut R, Ergonomic risk assessment of smartphone users using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. PLoS ONE 13(8):e0203394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203394

  25. Kim HJ, Kim JS (2015) The relationship between smartphone use and subjective musculoskeletal symptoms and university students. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 27(3):575–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Namwongsa S, Puntumetakul R, Swangnetr M (2017) Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders of smartphone users in Khon Kaen University students, Thailand. In: Dare to desire: the 2nd national ergonomics conference

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chaiklieng S, Pannak A, Duangprom N (2016) The assessment of ergonomics risk on upper limb disorder among electronic workers. Srinagarind Med J 31(2):202–209

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee S, Kang H, Shin G (2015) Head flexion angle while using a smartphone. Ergonomics 58(2):220–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jonsson B (1988) The static load component in muscle work. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 57(3):305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohlsson K, Attewell RG, Palsson B, Karlsson B, Balogh I, Johnsson B, Ahlm A, Skerfving S (1995) Repetitive industrial work and neck and upper limb disorders in females. Am J Ind Med 27(5):731–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Andersen JH, Fallentin N, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S (2011) Risk factors for neck and upper extremity disorders among computers users and the effect of interventions: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One 6(5)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Delisa J, Garie D, Gans B, Gatens P, Leonard J (1998) Rehabilitation medicine principle and practice. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hansraj KK (2014) Assessment of stresses in the cervical spine caused by posture and position of the head. Surg Technol Int 25:277–279

    Google Scholar 

  34. Greene WB, Heckman JD (1994) The clinical measurement of joint motion. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kietrys DM, Gerg MJ, Dropkin J, Gold JE (2015) Mobile input device type, texting style and screen size influence upper extremity and trapezius muscle activity, and cervical posture while texting. Appl Ergon 50:98–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Galinsky TL, Swanson NG, Sauter SL, Hurrell JJ, Schleifer LM (2000) A field study of supplementary rest breaks for data-entry operators. Ergonomics 43(5):622–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peper E, Gibney KH, Wilson VE (2004) Group training with healthy computing practices to prevent repetitive strain injury (rsi): a preliminary study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 29(4):279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rempel DM, Krause N, Goldberg R, Benner D, Hudes M (2006) A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of two workstation interventions on upper body pain and incident musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators. Occup Environ Med (London, England) 63(5):300–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aaras A, Ro O, Thoresen M (1999) Can a more neutral position of the forearm when operating a computer mouse reduce the pain level for visual display unit operators? A prospective epidemiological intervention study. Int J Human-Comput Interact 11(2):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mclean L, Tingley M, Scott RN, Rickards J (2001) Computer terminal work and the benefit of microbreaks. Appl Ergon 32(3):225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Greene BL, Dejoy DM, Olejnik S (2005) Effects of an active ergonomics training program on risk exposure, worker beliefs, and symptoms in computer users. Work 24(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lintula M, Nevala-Puranen N, Louhevaara V (2001) Effects of ergorest arm supports on muscle strain and wrist positions during the use of the mouse and keyboard in work with visual display units: a work site intervention. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 7(1):103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ketola R, Toivonen R, Hakkanen M, Luukkonen R, Takala EP, Viikari-Juntura E, Expert Group In E (2002) Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Scand J Work Environ Health 28(1):18–24

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cook C, Burgess-Limerick R (2004) The effect of forearm support on musculoskeletal discomfort during call centre work. Appl Ergon 35(4):337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brewer S, Van Eerd D, Amick BC 3rd, Irvin E, Daum KM, Gerr F, Moore JS, Cullen K, Rempel D (2006) Workplace interventions to prevent musculoskeletal and visual symptoms and disorders among computer users: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 16(3):325–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Andersen JH, Fallentin N, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S (2011) Risk factors for neck and upper extremity disorders among computers users and the effect of interventions: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hashimoto D, Kotani K, Suzuki S, Asao T (2015) Influence of posture awareness signals to the upper extremity posture and muscular loads during mobile device use. In: Proceedings 19th triennial congress of the IEA, Melbourne 9–14 Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gustafsson E, Johnson PW, Lindegard A, Hagberg M (2011) Technique, muscle activity and kinematic differences in young adults texting on mobile phones. Ergonomics 54(5):77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tang M (2016) An investigation of an ergonomic intervention on neck biomechanics and pain due to smartphone use

    Google Scholar 

  50. UCDAVIS Occupational Health services. Homepage: https://safetyservices.ucdavis.edu/article/laptop-ergonomics

  51. Nag PK, Pal S, Nag A, Vyas H (2009) Influence of arm and wrist support on forearm and back muscle activity in computer keyboard operation. Appl Ergon 40:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Onyebeke LC, Young JG, Trudeau MB, Dennerlein JT (2013) Effects of forearm and palm supports on the upper extremity during computer mouse use. Appl Ergon 45:564–570

    Google Scholar 

  53. Matos M, Arezesb PM (2015) Ergonomic evaluation of office workplaces with rapid office strain assessment (ROSA). Procedia Manuf 3:4689–4694

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liebregts J, Sonne M, Potvin JR (2015) Photograph-based ergonomic evaluations using the rapid office strain assessment (ROSA). Appl Ergon 52:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  55. Poochadaa W, Chaiklieng S (2015) Ergonomic risk assessment among call center workers. Procedia Manuf 3:4613–4620

    Google Scholar 

  56. James C, James D, Nie V, Schumacher T, Guest M, Tessier J, Marley J, Bohatko-Naismith J, Snodgrass S (2018) Musculoskeletal discomfort and use of computers in the university environment. Appl Ergon 69:128–135

    Google Scholar 

  57. Davis KG, Hammer MJ, Kotowski SE, Bhattacharya A (2014) An ergonomic comparison of data entry work using a keyboard vs. touch screen input device while standing and sitting. J Ergon S4(1)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lin MY, Barbir A, Dennerlein JT (2017) Evaluating biomechanics of use-selected sitting and standing computer workstation. Appl Ergon 65:382–388

    Google Scholar 

  59. Karakolis T, Callaghan JP (2013) The impact of sit-stand office workstations on worker discomfort and productivity: a review. Appl Ergon 45(3):799–806

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kumah DB (2016) Ergonomic challenges of employees using computers at work in a tertiary institution in Ghana. Optometry: Open Access 1(2)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Celik S, Celik K, Dirmese E, Tasdemir N, Arik T, Buyukkara I (2016) Determination of pain in musculoskeletal system reported by office workers and the pain risk factors. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 31(1):91–111

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lavina L, Filgueirasa E, Figueiredo C, Desouzart G (2015) Understanding the interaction of design students with portable computers in the classroom. Procedia Manuf 3:6274–6281

    Google Scholar 

  63. Korpinen L, Paakkonen R, Gobba F (2015) Self-reported ache, pain, or numbness in hip and lower back and use of computers and cell phones amongst Finns aged 18–65. Int J Ind Ergon 48:70–76

    Google Scholar 

  64. Koren K, Pisot R, Simunic B (2015) Active workstation allows office workers to work efficiently while exercising moderately. Appl Ergon 54:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  65. Commissaris DACM, K€onemann R, van Mastrigt SH, Burford E-M, Botter J, Douwes M, Ellegast RP (2014) Effects of a standing and three dynamic workstations on computer task performance and cognitive function tests. Appl Ergon 45:1570–1578

    Google Scholar 

  66. Leavy J, Jancey J (2016) Stand by me: qualitative insights into the ease of use of adjustable workstations. AIMS Public Health 3(3):633–662

    Google Scholar 

  67. Workineh SA, Yamaura H (2015) Multi-position ergonomic computer workstation design to increase comfort of computer work. Int J Ind Ergon 53:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  68. Werth A, Babski-Reeves K (2014) Effects of portable computing devices on posture, muscle activation levels and efficiency. Appl Ergon 45:1603–1609

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shariat A, Cleland JA, Danaeed M, Kargarfardb M, Sangelaji B, Tamrin SBM (2017) Effects of stretching exercise training and ergonomic modifications on musculoskeletal discomforts of office workers: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 22(2):144–153

    Google Scholar 

  70. Goostrey S, Treleaven J, Johnston V (2013) Evaluation of document location during computer use in terms of neck muscle activity and neck movement. Appl Ergon 45:767–772

    Google Scholar 

  71. Schmid AB, Kubler PA, Johnston V, Coppieters MW (2014) A vertical mouse and ergonomic mouse pads alter wrist position but do not reduce carpal tunnel pressure in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Appl Ergon 47:151–156

    Google Scholar 

  72. Fathel A (2015) Control software designation of postural and ergonomic variables during working with computer users. J Inf Technol Softw Eng 5(3)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wu Y, Wu T, Taele P, Wang B, Liu J, Ku P, Chen MY (2018) ActiveErgo : automatic and personalized ergonomics using self-actuating furniture. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174132

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mona Sahu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sahu, M., Gnana Sundari, K., David, A. (2021). Recent Ergonomic Interventions and Evaluations on Laptop, Smartphones and Desktop Computer Users. In: Arockiarajan, A., Duraiselvam, M., Raju, R. (eds) Advances in Industrial Automation and Smart Manufacturing. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4739-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4739-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4738-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4739-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics