Advertisement

Elements of Continuum Mechanics for Fluid Flow and General Stress–Strain System

Chapter
  • 510 Downloads

Abstract

The fundamental physical laws in fluid flows are obtained from the conservation of mass, translational momentum, and energy, with the latter being nothing but the first law of thermodynamics applied to a control volume system. While for solids and liquids, the properties vary continuously in their macroscopic states, it is not so apparent for gases, which is characterized by mobility at the molecular level. One describes the flow of gases from the average behavior of the molecular ensemble in the control volume. This approach presupposes the existence of very many large number of molecules in the control volume, so that the statistical description is feasible. This is the essence of the continuum assumption that despite the presence of discrete molecules constituting the system, one can approximate the assembly by continuous variation of macroscopic properties. Continuous variation of properties arises due to momentum and energy exchanges by incessant collisions of molecules taking place. One of the most relevant non-dimensional numbers, determining whether a gaseous flow can be considered continuum or one must use statistical approaches, is the Knudsen number.

References

  1. 1.
    R.L. Ash, A.J. Zuckerwar, Z. Zheng, Second Coefficient of Viscosity in Air. NASA-CR-187783 (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, UK, 1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Buresti, A note on Stokes hypothesis. Acta Mechanica 226(10), 3555–3559 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Chandrasekhar, Hydrodynamics and Hydrodynamic stability (Clarendon, Oxford, 1961)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.S. Cramer, Numerical estimates for the bulk viscosity of ideal gases. Phys. Fluid 24, 066102 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.M. Karim, L. Rosenhead, The second coefficient of viscosity of liquids and gases. Rev. Modern Phys. 24, 108–16 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Liebermann, The second viscosity of liquids. Phys. Rev. 75, 1415 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K.R. Rajagopal, A new development and interpretation of the Navier-Stokes fluid which reveals why the “Stokes’ assumption” is inapt. Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 50, 141–151 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Rayleigh, Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 14(1), 8 (1883)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K.I. Read, Experimental investigation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 12(1), 45–58 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Rosenhead, Introduction—the second coefficient of viscosity: a brief review of fundamentals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 226, 1–6 (1954)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.K. Sengupta, High Accuracy Computing Methods: Fluid Flows and Wave Phenomenon (Cambridge University Press, USA, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T.K. Sengupta, S.B. Talla, Robins-Magnus effect: a continuing saga. Curr. Sci. 86(7), 1033–1036 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.K. Sengupta, A. Kasliwal, S. De, M. Nair, Temporal flow instability for Magnus-Robins effect at high rotation rates. J. Fluids and Struct. 17, 941–953 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.K. Sengupta, A. Sengupta, N. Sharma, S. Sengupta, A. Bhole, K.S. Shruti, Roles of bulk viscosity on Rayleigh-Taylor instability: Non-equilibrium thermodynamics due to spatio-temporal pressure fronts. Phys. Fluids 28, 094102 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I.S. Sokolnikoff, Mathematical Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill, USA, 1946)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Taylor, The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 201(1065), 192–196 (1950)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.T. Tokumaru, P.E. Dimotakis, The lift of a cylinder rotary motion in a uniform flow. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 1–10 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W.G. Vincenti, C.H. Kruger, Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics (Wiley, USA, 1965)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    F.M. White, Fluid Mech., 6th edn. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia
  2. 2.School of Mechanical SciencesIndian Institute of Technology BhubaneswarBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations