Skip to main content

Instructional Design: Evidence-Based Practices in the Flipped Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flipped Classrooms with Diverse Learners

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Education ((SPTE))

  • 1385 Accesses

Abstract

The flipped model described in Chap. 1 has several key features that simplify the integration of evidence-based practices, leading to improved student learning outcomes. The first key element is the pre-meeting during which initial instruction occurs prior to the in-class time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arner, T., Aldosari, B., & Morris, B. J. (2017). Teaching students using evidence-based learning strategies through flipped classrooms. In R. Obeid, A. Schwartz, C. Shane-Simpson, & P. J. Brooks (Eds.), How we teach now: The GSTA guide to student centered teaching (pp. 92–106). Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/.

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrett, D. (2012, February 19). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857.

  • Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science,1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics,69(9), 970–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior,57, 250–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R. G., & VanLehn, K. (2007). Explaining self-explaining: A contrast between content and generation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications,158, 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, S. (2016). Digital in 2016. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/digital-in-2016.

  • Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning,1(3), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,18(1), 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist,63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.8.760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist,38(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. J. (2015). The flipped classroom improves student achievement and course satisfaction in a statistics course: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology,43(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education,58(1), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2015). Flipping the chemistry classroom with peer instruction. In J. Gavier-Martinez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 319–344). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. M. P., & Ralph, D. L. (2015). The flipped classroom: A twist on teaching. Contemporary Issues in Education Research,9(200348548), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education,34(9), 1337–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research,15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, M., Nerdel, C., & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations. Computers & Education,51(4), 1784–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, G. C., & Hattie, J. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Arner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arner, T. (2020). Instructional Design: Evidence-Based Practices in the Flipped Classroom. In: Walker, Z., Tan, D., Koh, N.K. (eds) Flipped Classrooms with Diverse Learners. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4171-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4171-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4170-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4171-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics