Abstract
The flipped model described in Chap. 1 has several key features that simplify the integration of evidence-based practices, leading to improved student learning outcomes. The first key element is the pre-meeting during which initial instruction occurs prior to the in-class time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arner, T., Aldosari, B., & Morris, B. J. (2017). Teaching students using evidence-based learning strategies through flipped classrooms. In R. Obeid, A. Schwartz, C. Shane-Simpson, & P. J. Brooks (Eds.), How we teach now: The GSTA guide to student centered teaching (pp. 92–106). Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Berrett, D. (2012, February 19). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Flipping-the-Classroom/130857.
Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science,1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics,69(9), 970–977.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266.
Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008.
Hao, Y., & Lee, K. S. (2016). Teaching in flipped classrooms: Exploring pre-service teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior,57, 250–260.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, England: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 81–112.
Hausmann, R. G., & VanLehn, K. (2007). Explaining self-explaining: A contrast between content and generation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications,158, 417.
Kemp, S. (2016). Digital in 2016. Retrieved from http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/digital-in-2016.
Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning,1(3), 201–212.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,18(1), 52–65.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist,63(8), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.8.760.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist,38(1), 1–4.
Peterson, D. J. (2015). The flipped classroom improves student achievement and course satisfaction in a statistics course: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology,43(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620063.
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education,58(1), 136–153.
Schell, J., & Mazur, E. (2015). Flipping the chemistry classroom with peer instruction. In J. Gavier-Martinez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practices, opportunities and trends (pp. 319–344). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
Schmidt, S. M. P., & Ralph, D. L. (2015). The flipped classroom: A twist on teaching. Contemporary Issues in Education Research,9(200348548), 1–6.
Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education,34(9), 1337–1370.
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research,15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 82–83.
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Yaman, M., Nerdel, C., & Bayrhuber, H. (2008). The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations. Computers & Education,51(4), 1784–1794.
Yates, G. C., & Hattie, J. (2013). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London, England: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arner, T. (2020). Instructional Design: Evidence-Based Practices in the Flipped Classroom. In: Walker, Z., Tan, D., Koh, N.K. (eds) Flipped Classrooms with Diverse Learners. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4171-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4171-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4170-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4171-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)