Advertisement

LED-Based Photoacoustic Imaging for Guiding Peripheral Minimally Invasive Procedures

Chapter
  • 410 Downloads
Part of the Progress in Optical Science and Photonics book series (POSP, volume 7)

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) could be useful for improving guidance of peripheral minimally invasive procedures. In this clinical application space, light emitting diodes (LEDs) have several potential advantages as excitation sources. B-mode ultrasound (US) imaging is often used for guiding invasive medical devices; however, most anatomical structures do not have unique US appearances, so the misidentification of tissues is common. There are several potential uses for LED-based PAI, including identifying procedural targets, avoiding critical tissue structures, and localising invasive medical devices relative to external imaging probes. In this chapter, we discuss the state-of-the-art of visualising tissue structures and medical devices relevant to minimally invasive procedures with PAI, key clinical considerations, and challenges involved with translating LED-based PAI systems from the benchtop to clinical use.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences at the University College London, and Dr Mithun Singh for helpful feedback on this Chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Beard, Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus 1, 602–631 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Zhu, G. Xu, J. Yuan et al., Light emitting diodes based photoacoustic imaging and potential clinical applications. Sci. Rep. 8, 9885 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28131-4ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Balthasar, A.E. Desjardins, M. van der Voort et al., Optical detection of peripheral nerves: an in vivo human study. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 37, 277–282 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31824a57c2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Nachabé, B.H.W. Hendriks, A.E. Desjardins et al., Estimation of lipid and water concentrations in scattering media with diffuse optical spectroscopy from 900 to 1600 nm. J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 037015 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3454392ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.K. Dasa, C. Markos, M. Maria et al., High-pulse energy supercontinuum laser for high-resolution spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging of lipids in the 1650–1850 nm region. Biomed. Opt. Express 9, 1762 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.001762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Hu, L. Wang, Photoacoustic imaging and characterization of the microvasculature, in Proceedings of SPIE (2010), p. 011101Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.F. Zhang, K. Maslov, G. Stoica, L.V. Wang, Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 848–851 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.Z. Zhang, J.G. Laufer, R.B. Pedley, P.C. Beard, In vivo high-resolution 3D photoacoustic imaging of superficial vascular anatomy. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 1035–1046 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/4/014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.P. Fronheiser, S.A. Ermilov, H.-P. Brecht et al., Real-time optoacoustic monitoring and three-dimensional mapping of a human arm vasculature. J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 021305 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3370336ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Zabihian, J. Weingast, M. Liu et al., In vivo dual-modality photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography imaging of human dermatological pathologies. Biomed Opt Express 6, 3163 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.6.003163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C.P. Favazza, L.A. Cornelius, L.V. Wang, In vivo functional photoacoustic microscopy of cutaneous microvasculature in human skin. J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 026004 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3536522ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.A. Plumb, N.T. Huynh, J. Guggenheim et al., Rapid volumetric photoacoustic tomographic imaging with a Fabry-Perot ultrasound sensor depicts peripheral arteries and microvascular vasomotor responses to thermal stimuli. Eur. Radiol. 28, 1037–1045 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5080-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Q. Yao, Y. Ding, G. Liu, L. Zeng, Low-cost photoacoustic imaging systems based on laser diode and light-emitting diode excitation. J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 10, 1730003 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545817300038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Zhong, T. Duan, H. Lan et al., Review of low-cost photoacoustic sensing and imaging based on laser diode and light-emitting diode. Sensors 18, 2264 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.S. Hansen, Using high-power light emitting diodes for photoacoustic imaging, in Proceedings of SPIE. International Society for Optics and Photonics, eds. by J. D’hooge, M.M. Doyley, p. 79680AGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.J. Allen, P.C. Beard, Light emitting diodes as an excitation source for biomedical photoacoustics, in Proceedings of SPIE, eds. by A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2013), p. 85811FGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Hariri, J. Lemaster, J. Wang et al., The characterization of an economic and portable LED-based photoacoustic imaging system to facilitate molecular imaging. Photoacoustics 9, 10–20 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PACS.2017.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. Xia, M. Kuniyil Ajith Singh, E. Maneas et al., Handheld real-time LED-based photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging system for accurate visualization of clinical metal needles and superficial vasculature to guide minimally invasive procedures. Sensors 18, 1394 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Xia, E. Maneas, N. Trung Huynh et al., Imaging of human peripheral blood vessels during cuff occlusion with a compact LED-based photoacoustic and ultrasound system, in Proceedings of SPIE, eds. by A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (SPIE, 2019), p. 3Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E. Maneas, R. Aughwane, N. Huynh et al., Photoacoustic imaging of the human placental vasculature. J. Biophotonics (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201900167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Thompson, T. Barrows, Carotid arterial cannulation: removing the risk with ultrasound? Can. J. Anesth. 56, 471–472 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9082-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Balthasar, A.E. Desjardins, M. van der Voort et al., Optical detection of vascular penetration during nerve blocks: an in vivo human study. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 37, 3–7 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182377ff1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Song, Y. Zhou, D. Huang, Inadvertent posterior intercostal artery puncture and haemorrhage after ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: a case report. BMC Anesthesiol. 18, 196 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0667-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. Shirozu, S. Kuramoto, S. Kido et al., Hematoma after transversus abdominis plane block in a patient with HELLP syndrome. A A Case Rep. 8, 257–260 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. Helen, B.D. O’Donnell, E. Moore, Nerve localization techniques for peripheral nerve block and possible future directions. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 59, 962–974 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.M. Mari, W. Xia, S.J. West, A.E. Desjardins, Interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging with a clinical ultrasound probe for discriminating nerves and tendons: an ex vivo pilot study. J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 110503 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.11.110503ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. Piras, C. Grijsen, P. Schütte et al., Photoacoustic needle: minimally invasive guidance to biopsy. J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 070502 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.070502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Xia, D.I. Nikitichev, J.M. Mari et al., Performance characteristics of an interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging system for guiding minimally invasive procedures. J. Biomed. Opt. 20, 086005 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.8.086005ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. Xia, D.I. Nikitichev, J.M. Mari et al., An interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging platform for the guidance of minimally invasive procedures, in Opto-Acoustic Methods and Applications in Biophotonics II (OSA, Washington, D.C., 2015), p. 95390DGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    W. Xia, E. Maneas, D.I. Nikitichev et al., Interventional photoacoustic imaging of the human placenta with ultrasonic tracking for minimally invasive fetal surgeries, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (Springer, Cham, 2015), pp. 371–378Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    W. Xia, S. Noimark, E. Maneas et al., led-based photoacoustic imaging of medical devices with carbon nanotube-polydimethylsiloxane composite coatings, in Biophotonics Congress: Biomedical Optics Congress 2018 (Microscopy/Translational/Brain/OTS) (OSA, Washington, D.C., 2018), p. JW3A.4Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    T. Allen, B. Cox, P.C. Beard, Generating photoacoustic signals using high-peak power pulsed laser diodes, in Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2005: The Sixth Conference on Biomedical Thermoacoustics, Optoacoustics, and Acousto-Optics (2005), pp. 233–242Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    T. Allen, 2006 undefined pulsed near-infrared laser diode excitation system for biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. http://osapublishing.org
  34. 34.
    R.G.M. Kolkman, W. Steenbergen, T.G. van Leeuwen, In vivo photoacoustic imaging of blood vessels with a pulsed laser diode. Lasers Med. Sci. 21, 134–139 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0384-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    T.J. Allen, P.C. Beard, High power visible light emitting diodes as pulsed excitation sources for biomedical photoacoustics. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 1260 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.001260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    X. Dai, H. Yang, H. Jiang, In vivo photoacoustic imaging of vasculature with a low-cost miniature light emitting diode excitation. Opt. Lett. 42, 1456 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.001456ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    T.J. Allen, P.C. Beard, Pulsed near-infrared laser diode excitation system for biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Opt. Lett. 31, 3462 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.31.003462ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    C. Willert, B. Stasicki, J. Klinner, S. Moessner, Pulsed operation of high-power light emitting diodes for imaging flow velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 075402 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/21/7/075402ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Singh, T. Agano, N. Sato et al., Real-time in vivo imaging of human lymphatic system using an LED-based photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging system, in Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2018, eds. by A.A. Oraevsky, L.V. Wang (SPIE, 2018), p. 3Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. Leggio, S. Gawali, D. Gallego et al., Optoacoustic response of gold nanorods in soft phantoms using high-power diode laser assemblies at 870 and 905 nm. Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 1430 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.001430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    F. Gao, L. Bai, X. Feng et al., Remarkable in vivo nonlinear photoacoustic imaging based on near-infrared organic dyes. Small 12, 5239–5244 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201602121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    F. Gao, L. Bai, S. Liu et al., Rationally encapsulated gold nanorods improving both linear and nonlinear photoacoustic imaging contrast in vivo. Nanoscale 9, 79–86 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Beckmann, B.S. Gutrath, Size dependent photoacoustic signal response of gold nanoparticles using a multispectral laser diode system, in IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS (2012), pp. 2336–2339Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    B.S. Gutrath, M.F. Beckmann, A. Buchkremer et al., Size-dependent multispectral photoacoustic response of solid and hollow gold nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 23, 225707 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/22/225707ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    V. Cunningham, H. Lamela, Laser optoacoustic spectroscopy of gold nanorods within a highly scattering medium. Opt. Lett. 35, 3387–3389 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    E.C. Mackle, E. Maneas, C. Little et al., Wall-less vascular poly(vinyl) alcohol gel ultrasound imaging phantoms using 3D printed vessels, in Design and Quality for Biomedical Technologies XII, eds. by R. Liang, T.J. Pfefer, J. Hwang (SPIE, 2019), p. 25Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    E. Maneas, W. Xia, O. Ogunlade et al., Gel wax-based tissue-mimicking phantoms for multispectral photoacoustic imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 9, 1151 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.001151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    P. Raumonen, T. Tarvainen, Segmentation of vessel structures from photoacoustic images with reliability assessment. Biomed. Opt. Express 9, 2887–2904 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.9.002887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    J. Zhang, B.I.N. Chen, M. Zhou, H. Lan, Photoacoustic image classification and segmentation of breast cancer: A feasibility study. IEEE Access 7, 5457–5466 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2888910CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics and BioengineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Wellcome-EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical SciencesCharles Bell HouseLondonUK
  3. 3.School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of AnaesthesiaUniversity College HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations