Skip to main content

Adaptability of SMEs Owners’/Managers’ Environmental Attitude and Values

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Charting a Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Business and Social Sciences

Abstract

In the quest for a sustainable society, green management has taken the forefront. Nevertheless, manufacturing small–medium enterprises (SMEs) have on the whole fallen behind in attempts to reduce environmental impact and have been noted to face particular challenges in undertaking and implementing environmental improvements in their operations. Furthermore, the global burden of sustainable green practices had begun to tilt sharply toward the developing countries such as Malaysia, and this will be a significant challenge to meet the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals. For this reason, the aim of this study encompasses owners’/managers’ environmental attitude and personal values toward sustainable green practices in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. Furthermore, to fulfill this gap, this study was conducted to examine the interrelationship between owners’/managers’ environmental attitude and personal values on sustainable green practices and to understand what motivates SMEs owners/managers to improve their environmental performance and explore the challenges faced in the SMEs. Administrative questionnaires were used to collect data from 260 manufacturing SMEs. Results indicated that environmental attitude has a significant positive effect on the firm’s sustainable green practices, but such effects were not shown by environmental values. It offers a generalized sustainable green practices implementation linking SMEs owners/managers with the integration of Sustainable Development Goals 9 and 12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aquilani B, Silvestri C, Ruggieri A (2018) TQM and value co-creation processes: the role of critical success factors. Sustainability 8:995–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie E (2007) The practice of social research. 11th Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 24(511):66–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier G, Niehoff S, Ziems T, Xue B (2017) Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry—a comparative study from China and Germany. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 4:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer S, Hoejmose S, Marchant K (2012) Environmental management in SME s in the UK: Practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Bus Strat Environ 21(7):423–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Quinn RE (2011) Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: based on the competing values framework. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassells S, Lewis K (2011) SMEs and environmental responsibility: do actions reflect attitudes? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(3):186–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury D, Rao VG, Mishra MK (2019) Impact of strategic and tactical green marketing orientation on SMEs performance. Theor Econ Lett 9:1633–1650

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell SR, Joshi AW (2013) Corporate ecological responsiveness: antecedent effects of institutional pressure and top management commitment and their impact on organizational performance. Bus Strat Environ 22(2):73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A, Matten D, Glozer S, Spence L (2019) Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000) New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues 56(3):425–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein MJ (2018) Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faller CM, zu Knyphausen-Aufseß D (2018) Does equity ownership matter for corporate social responsibility? A literature review of theories and recent empirical findings. J Bus Ethics 150(1):15–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod 137:1573–1587

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche D, Oz E (2007) Personal values’ influence on the ethical dimension of decision making. J Bus Ethics 75(4):335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadenne DL, Kennedy J, McKeiver C (2009) An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. J Bus Ethics 84(1):45–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Garetti M, Taisch M (2012) Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Prod Plan & Control 23(2–3):83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel P, Reuter C, Pibernik R, Sichtmann C, Bals L (2018) Purchasing managers’ willingness to pay for attributes that constitute sustainability. J Oper Manag 62:44–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: global edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillary R (2017) Small and medium-sized enterprises and the environment: business imperatives. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn S (2014) Sustainability strategies for business: an integrated approach with a life cycle perspective. Jyväskylä studies in business and economics. Jyväskylä University Printing House, Jyväskylä

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Vyas V, Chalasani DPS (2016) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in SMEs: a structural equation modelling approach. Glob Bus Rev 17(3):630–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali D, Zanhour M, Keshishian T (2009) Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. J Bus Ethics 87(3):355–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson J, Nilsson J, Modig F, HedVall G (2017) Commitment to sustainability in small and medium-sized enterprises: The influence of strategic orientations and management values. Bus Strat Environ 26(1):69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim A, Kim Y, Han K, Jackson SE, Ployhart RE (2017) Multilevel influences on voluntary workplace green behavior: individual differences, leader behavior, and coworker advocacy. J Manag 43(5):1335–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBreton JM, Tonidandel S (2008) Multivariate relative importance: extending relative weight analysis to multivariate criterion spaces. J Appl Psychol 93(2):329–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung K, Morris MW (2015) Values, schemas, and norms in the culture–behavior nexus: a situated dynamics framework. J Int Bus Stud 46(9):1028–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Sun J, Wang SL (2011) Emerging economy copycats: capability, environment, and strategy. Acad Manag Perspect 25(2):37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Madueño JH, Jorge ML, Conesa IM, Martínez-Martínez D (2016) Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: empirical evidence from a stakeholders’ perspective. BRQ Bus Res Q 19(1):55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltzie S (2015) Benefit importance, benefit satisfaction, and organizational commitment of anIntergenerational workforce in small-and medium-sized businesses. Northcentral University

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont TL, Duckitt J (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: a first-and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J Environ Psychol 24(3):289–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell S, O’Dowd P, Dimache A (2011) The issue of waste in European manufacturing SMEs. In: In the proceedings of the 13th international waste management and landfill symposium, S. Margherita di Pula (Cagliari)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherji A, Mukherji J (2017) Environmental uncertainty and positive performance of small firms: the roles of key mediators. J Organ Psychol 17(3):24–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller JM, Kiel D, Voigt K (2018) What drives the implementation of industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability 10:247

    Google Scholar 

  • Nejati M, Amran A, Hazlina Ahmad N (2014) Examining stakeholders’ influence on environmental responsibility of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and its outcomes. Manag Decis 52(10):2021–2043

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund AM, Garvill J (2002) Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environ Behav 34(6):740–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Potocan V, Nedelko Z, Mulej M (2012) Influence of organizational factors on management tools usage in Slovenian organizations. Inz Ekon-Eng Econ 23(3):291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasi RZRM, Abdekhodaee A, Nagarajah R (2014) Stakeholders’ involvements in the implementation of proactive environmental practices: Linking environmental practices and environmental performances in SMEs. Manag Environ Qual: Int J 25(2):132–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Revell A, Stokes D, Chen H (2010) Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf? Bus Strat Environ 19(5):273–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach M (1979) From individual to institutional values: with special reference to the values of science. Underst Hum Values 47:70

    Google Scholar 

  • Roxas B, Chadee D (2016) Knowledge management view of environmental sustainability in manufacturing SMEs in the Philippines. Knowl Manag Res & Pract 14(4):514–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherfoord R, Blackburn RA, Spence LJ (2000) Environmental management and the small firm: an international comparison. Int J Entrep Behav & Res 6(6):310–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer A, Williams S, Blundel R (2018) Individual values and SME environmental engagement. Bus Soc, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317750134

  • Schlosberg D (2019) From postmaterialism to sustainable materialism: the environmental politics of practice-based movements. Environ Polit 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U, Bougie R (2016) Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano RA (2017) Innovation management in high-tech SMEs’ new product development process: a case of small-medium wind turbines. Doctoral dissertation, Manchester Business School

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleesman DJ, Lennard AC, McNamara G, Conlon DE (2018) Putting escalation of commitment in context: a multilevel review and analysis. Acad Manag Ann 12(1):178–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost H (2017) Measurement and scaling techniques in research methodology; survey/questionnaire development. Int J Acad Res Manag 6(1):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa F, Gusmerottia NM, Corsini F, Passetti E, Iraldo F (2016) Factors affecting environmental management by small and micro firms: the importance of entrepreneurs’ attitudes and environmental investment. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 23(6):373–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Triguero A, Álvarez-Aledo C, Cuerva MC (2016) Factors influencing willingness to accept different waste management policies: empirical evidence from the European Union. J Clean Prod 138:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams S, Schaefer A (2013) Small and medium-sized enterprises and sustainability: managers’ values and engagement with environmental and climate change issues. Bus Strat Environ 22(3):173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams S, Schaefer A, Blundel R (2017) Understanding value conflict to engage SME managers with business greening. In: Perspectives on philosophy of management and business ethics. Springer, Cham, pp 73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacob P, Wong LS, Khor SC (2019) An empirical investigation of green initiatives and environmental sustainability for manufacturing SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag 30(1):2–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou KH, Tuncali K, Silverman SG (2003) Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227(3):617–628

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Yacob .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yacob, P., Fared, M., Maludin, N., Nur Syaheeda, Wira, A., Peter, D. (2020). Adaptability of SMEs Owners’/Managers’ Environmental Attitude and Values. In: Kaur, N., Ahmad, M. (eds) Charting a Sustainable Future of ASEAN in Business and Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3859-9_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics