Skip to main content

Effects of Gravity Erosion on Particle Size Distribution of Suspended Sediment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Experimental Erosion
  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

Gravity erosion generates an enormous volume of sediments on steep slopes throughout the world, yet its effect on the particle size distribution of suspended sediments (PSDSS) remains poorly understood. In this chapter, experiments were conducted in a field mobile laboratory in which mass movements were triggered on steep slopes under simulated rainfall. A suite of indexes such as median sediment size (d50), sediment heterogeneity (H), fractal dimension (D), and enrichment/dilution ratio (Red) were used to evaluate the effect of mass movement on PSDSS. Mass movements led to a drastic increase in the sediment concentration and the enrichment of fine particles, which developed into hyperconcentrated flows. \( R_{\text{ed}}{\text{s}} \) for clay, silt, and sand fractions were 13.9, 1.4, and 0.7 respectively. The d50, H, and D were significantly correlated with slope failures. The changes of PSDSS after mass movements reflected a combined complex effect of soil sources, erosion types, selective detachment, and deposition processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abarca M, Guerra P, Arce G, et al. 2016. Response of suspended sediment particle size distributions to changes in water chemistry at an Andean mountain stream confluence receiving arsenic rich acid drainage. Hydrological Processes, 31(2): 296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson J. 1975. Collision rates of small particles in a vigorously turbulent fluid. Chemical Engineering Science, 30(11): 1371–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya G, Cochrane T, Davies T, et al. 2011. Quantifying and modeling post-failure sediment yields from laboratory-scale soil erosion and shallow landslide experiments with silty loess. Geomorphology, 129(1–2): 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberts E E, Moldenhauer W C, Foster G R. 1980. Soil aggregates and primary particles transported in rill and interrill flow. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(3): 590–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadi H, Moussavi A, Ghadiri H, et al. 2011. Flow-driven soil erosion processes and the size selectivity of sediment. Journal of Hydrology, 406(1–2): 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuselinck L, Govers G, Hairsine P B, et al. 2002. The influence of rainfall on sediment transport by overland flow over areas of net deposition. Journal of Hydrology, 257(1–4): 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley R J. 1964. Geography and analogue theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 54(1), 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane T A, Acharya G. 2011. Changes in sediment delivery from hillslopes affected by shallow landslides and soil armouring. Journal of Hydrology, 50(1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins A L, Walling D E, Leeks G J L. 1997. Source type ascription for fluvial suspended sediment based on a quantitative composite fingerprinting technique. Catena, 29(1): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosta G B, Frattini P, Fusi N. 2007. Fragmentation in the Val Pola rock avalanche, Italian Alps. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface, 112:F01006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies T R, McSaveney M J. 2009. The role of rock fragmentation in the motion of large landslides. Engineering Geology, 109(1–2): 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao G L, Ding G D, Wu B, et al. 2014. Fractal scaling of particle size distribution and relationships with topsoil properties affected by biological soil crusts. Plos One, 9(2): e88559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govers G. 1985. Selectivity and transport capacity of thin flows in relation to rill erosion. Catena, 12(1): 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grismer M E, Ellis A L, Fristensky A. 2008. Runoff sediment particle sizes associated with soil erosion in the Lake Tahoe Basin, USA. Land Degradation and Development, 19(3): 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo W Z, Xu X Z, Wang W L, et al. 2016. A measurement system applicable for landslide experiments in the field. Review of Scientific Instruments, 87(4): 044501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Y F, Yang Y, Liu B Y, et al. 2016. Size characteristics of sediments eroded from three soils in China under natural rainfall. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(8): 2153–2165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haritashya U K, Kumar A, Singh P. 2010. Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment transported in meltwater from the Gangotri Glacier, central Himalaya - An indicator of subglacial sediment evacuation. Geomorphology, 122(1–2): 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • He J J, Sun LY, Gong H L, et al. 2017. Laboratory studies on the influence of rainfall pattern on rill erosion and its runoff and sediment characteristics. Land Degradation and Development, 28(5): 1615–1625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland K T, Elmore P A. 2008. A review of heterogeneous sediments in coastal environments. Earth-Science Reviews, 89(3–4): 116–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issa O M, Bissonnais Y L, Planchon O, et al. 2006. Soil detachment and transport on field and laboratory scale interrill areas: erosion processes and the size-selectivity of eroded sediment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(8): 929–939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia X P, Li Y S, Wang H B. 2016. Bed sediment particle size characteristics and its sources implication in the desert reach of the Yellow River. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(11): 950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer D K, Larsen M C. 2007. Assessing landslide hazards. Science, 316(5828): 1136–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koiter A J, Owens P N, Petticrew E L, et al. 2017. The role of soil surface properties on the particle size and carbon selectivity of interrill erosion in agricultural landscapes. Catena, 153: 194–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T J, Wang G Q, Xue H, et al. 2009. Soil erosion and sediment transport in the gullied Loess Plateau: scale effects and their mechanisms. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 52(2): 1283–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyu X F, Yu J B, Zhou M, et al. 2015. Changes of soil particle size distribution in tidal flats in the Yellow River Delta. Plos One, 10(3): e0121368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden M, Herzig A, Basher L. 2014. Erosion process contribution to sediment yield before and after the establishment of exotic forest: Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 226: 162–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer L D, Line D E, Harmon W C. 1992. Size characteristics of sediment from agricultural soils. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 47(1): 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen D A, Townsend C R. 2003. Hyporheic community composition in a gravel-bed stream: influence of vertical hydrological exchange, sediment structure and physicochemistry. Freshwater Biology, 48(8): 1363–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson T C. 2005. Hyperconcentrated flow-transitional process between water flow and debris flow. In Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 159–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian N. 1989. Movements of hyper-concentration flows. Beijing: Qinghua University Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries J B, 2000. The landslide in the Surma Khola valley, High Mountain Region of the Central Himalaya in Nepal. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Part B Hydrology Oceans and Atmosphere, 25(1): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi S H, Harchegani M K. 2012. Effects of sand mining on suspended sediment particle size distribution in Kojour Forest River, Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 14(3): 1637–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S A, Mosley M P, Weaver W E. 1987. Experimental fluvial geomorphology. New York: John Wiley and Sons: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanmugam G. 1996. High-density turbidity currents: are they sandy debris flows? Journal of Sedimentary Research, 66(1): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi Z H, Yue B J, Wang L, et al. 2013. Effects of mulch cover rate on interrill erosion processes and the size selectivity of eroded sediment on steep slopes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77(1): 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slattery M C, Burt T P. 1997. Particle size characteristics of suspended sediment in hillslope runoff and stream flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22(8): 705–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T B, Owens P N. 2014. Flume- and field-based evaluation of a time-integrated suspended sediment sampler for the analysis of sediment properties. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(9): 1197–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone P M, Walling D E. 1997. Particle size selectivity considerations in suspended sediment budget investigations. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 99(1–4): 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland D G, Ball M H, Hilton S J, et al. 2002. Evolution of a landslide-induced sediment wave in the Navarro River, California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 114(8): 1036–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte D L. 1986. Fractals and fragmentation. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 91(B2): 1921–1926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler S W, Wheatcraft S W. 1992. Fractal scaling of soil particle-size distributions: analysis and limitations. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(2): 362–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling D E, Moorehead P W. 1989. The particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment: an overview. Hydrobiologia, 176(1): 125–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling D E, Woodward J C. 1995. Tracing sources of suspended sediment in river basins: a case study of the River Culm, Devon, UK. Marine and Freshwater Research, 46(1): 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling D E, Owens P N, Waterfall B D, et al. 2000. The particle size characteristics of fluvial suspended sediment in the Humber and Tweed catchments, UK. Science of the Total Environment, 251–252: 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Fu B J, Zhao W W, et al. 2008. Multifractal characteristics of soil particle size distribution under different land-use types on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 72(1): 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y C, Liu K, Lau D L, et al. 2010. Maximum SNR pattern strategy for phase shifting methods in structured light illumination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 27(9): 1962–1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling V, Legout C, Gratiot N, et al. 2016. Dynamics of soil aggregate size in turbulent flow: respective effect of soil type and suspended concentration. Catena, 141: 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J C, Walling D E. 2007. Composite suspended sediment particles in river systems: their incidence, dynamics and physical characteristics. Hydrological Processes, 21(26): 3601–3614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J X. 1999. Erosion caused by hyperconcentrated flow on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 36(1–2): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J X. 2000. Grain-size characteristics of suspended sediment in the Yellow River, China. Catena, 38(3): 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J X. 2002. Implication of relationships among suspended sediment size, water discharge and suspended sediment concentration: the Yellow River basin, China. Catena, 49(4): 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X Z, Liu Z Y, Wang W L, et al. 2015a. Which is more hazardous: avalanche, landslide, or mudslid? Natural Hazards, 76(3): 1939–1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X Z, Liu Z Y, Xiao P Q, et al. 2015b. Gravity erosion on the steep loess slope: Behavior, trigger and sensitivity. Catena, 135: 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X Z, Guo W Z, Liu Y K, et al. 2017. Landslides on the Loess Plateau of China: a latest statistics together with a close look. Natural Hazards, 86(3): 1393–1403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J Y, Gu P P, Li L Y, et al. 2016. Changes of soil particle size fraction along a chronosequence in sandy desertified land: a fundamental process for ecosystem succession and ecological restoration. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(12): 2651–2656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Science Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Xu, X., Zhu, T., Zhang, H., Gao, L. (2020). Effects of Gravity Erosion on Particle Size Distribution of Suspended Sediment. In: Experimental Erosion. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3801-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics