Skip to main content

Towards a Reliable Machine Learning-Based Global Misbehavior Detection in C–ITS: Model Evaluation Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks for Smart Cities

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1144))

Abstract

Global misbehavior detection in Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C–ITS) is carried out by a central entity named Misbehavior Authority (MA). The detection is based on local misbehavior detection information sent by Vehicle’s On–Board Units (OBUs) and by Road–Side Units (RSUs) called Misbehavior Reports (MBRs) to the MA. By analyzing these Misbehavior Reports (MBRs), the MA is able to compute various misbehavior detection information. In this work, we propose and evaluate different Machine Learning (ML)-based solutions for the internal detection process of the MA. We show through extensive simulation and several detection metrics the ability of solutions to precisely identify different misbehavior types.

This research work has been carried out in the framework of the Technological Research Institute SystemX, and therefore granted with public funds within the scope of the French Program Investissements d’avenir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Codeca, L., Frank, R., Engel, T.: Luxembourg sumo traffic (lust) scenario: 24 hours of mobility for vehicular networking research. In: IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), December 2015, pp. 1–8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Framework For Misbehavior Detection (F2MD): F2MD website. https://www.irt-systemx.fr/f2md (2019)

  4. Friedman, J.H.: Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38(4), 367–378 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghaleb, F.A., Zainal, A., Rassam, M.A., Mohammed, F.: An effective misbehavior detection model using artificial neural network for vehicular ad hoc network applications. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS), pp. 13–18. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grover, J., Laxmi, V., Gaur, M.S.: Misbehavior detection based on ensemble learning in VANET. In: International Conference on Advanced Computing, Networking and Security, pp. 602–611. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grover, J., Prajapati, N.K., Laxmi, V., Gaur, M.S.: Machine learning approach for multiple misbehavior detection in VANET. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications, pp. 644–653. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gyawali, S., Qian, Y.: Misbehavior detection using machine learning in vehicular communication networks. In: ICC 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv:1502.03167 (2015)

  10. Jaeger, A., Bißmeyer, N., Stübing, H., Huss, S.A.: A novel framework for efficient mobility data verification in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Int. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. Res. 10(1), 11–21 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13177-011-0038-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamel, J., Ben Jemaa, I., Kaiser, A., Urien, P.: Misbehavior reporting protocol for C-ITS. In: 2018 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), December 2018, pp. 1–4 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kamel, J.: Github repository: framework for misbehavior detection (f2md). https://github.com/josephkamel/f2md (2019)

  13. Kamel, J., Kaiser, A., Ben Jemaa, I., Cincilla, P., Urien, P.: CaTch: a confidence range tolerant misbehavior detection approach. In: 2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (IEEE WCNC 2019), April 2019. Marrakech, Morocco (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  15. Krajzewicz, D., Erdmann, J., Behrisch, M., Bieker, L.: Recent development and applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility. Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. 5(3&4), 128–138 (2012). http://elib.dlr.de/80483/

  16. Lin, T.Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Dollár, P.: Focal loss for dense object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2980–2988 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petit, J., Ansari, R.: V2X Validation Tool. https://bitbucket.org/onboardsecurity/dsrcvt (BlackHat 2018)

  18. Petit, J., Schaub, F., Feiri, M., Kargl, F.: Pseudonym schemes in vehicular networks: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(1), 228–255 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. So, S., Petit, J., Starobinski, D.: Physical layer plausibility checks for misbehavior detection in v2x networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, pp. 84–93. ACM, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. So, S., Sharma, P., Petit, J.: Integrating plausibility checks and machine learning for misbehavior detection in VANET. In: 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 564–571. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sommer, C., German, R., Dressler, F.: Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved IVC analysis. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 10(1), 3–15 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Heijden, R.W., Lukaseder, T., Kargl, F.: Veremi: a dataset for comparable evaluation of misbehavior detection in VANETS. In: International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Systems, pp. 318–337. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van der Heijden, R.W., Dietzel, S., Leinmüller, T., Kargl, F.: Survey on misbehavior detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 21(1), 779–811 (Firstquarter 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Varga, A.: The omnet++ discrete event simulation system. In: ESM’01 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Kamel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mahmoudi, I., Kamel, J., Ben-Jemaa, I., Kaiser, A., Urien, P. (2020). Towards a Reliable Machine Learning-Based Global Misbehavior Detection in C–ITS: Model Evaluation Approach. In: Laouiti, A., Qayyum, A., Mohamad Saad, M. (eds) Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks for Smart Cities. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1144. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3750-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics