Skip to main content

Effect of Cell Height and Infill Density on the Performance of Geocell-Reinforced Beds of Brahmaputra River Sand

Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE,volume 72)

Abstract

Geocells, which are three-dimensional interconnected cells, are laid over foundation bases to provide lateral confinement to the infill material and thus improve the load-bearing capacity of the bases. Some experimental and mathematical studies have been reported in the literature in this regard. In this research, a laboratory experimental program was undertaken to study the improvement of bearing capacity of geocell-reinforced granular bases made from Brahmaputra river sand. In a laboratory model test, a steel tank was filled with Brahmaputra river sand, reinforced with geocell of different heights (made from woven geotextile), and progressively loaded to record the load versus settlement response. The infill density of sand was also varied to evaluate the effect on performance of geocell-reinforced sand beds. A square steel plate placed on the geocell-reinforced sand bed was incrementally loaded till failure to quantify the positive effects of geocell height and density of infill soil on the resultant bearing capacity. Enhancement of bearing capacity of geocell-reinforced sand bed with the increase in geocell height and density of infill material was evident from the test results. The bearing capacity of the geocell-reinforced bed, as compared to an unreinforced bed, is found to be increased by 1.8–4.3 times for normalized height of 0.33–1, having infill soil relative density of 70%, and 4.3–8.6 times for normalized height of 0.33–1, having infill soil relative density of 90%. The test results also show that significant reduction of settlement is achieved by the use of geocell reinforcement.

Keywords

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
EUR   29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR   213.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR   263.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR   263.74
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 19:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 21:197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2005) Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Can Geotech J 42:693–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerato AB, Lutenegger AJ (2007) Scale effects of shallow foundation bearing capacity on granular material. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133(10):1192–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Madhavi Latha G, Somwanshi A (2009) Effect of reinforcement form on the bearing capacity of square footing on sand. Geotext Geomembr 27:409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moghaddas Tafreshi SN, Dawson AR (2010) Behavior of footings on reinforced sand subjected to repeated loading comparing use of 3D and planar geotextile. Geotext Geomembr 28:434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL, Halahmi I (2010) Investigation of factors influencing behaviour of single geocell reinforced bases under static loading. Geotext Geomembr 28(6):570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dash SK (2010) Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. Geotext Geomembr 19:235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedge A, Sitharam TG (2013) Experimental and numerical studies on footings supported on geocell reinforced sand and clay beds. Int J Geotech Eng 7(4):346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kargar M, Mir Mohammad Hosseini SM (2017) Effect of reinforcement geometry onthe performance of a reduced-scale strip footing model supported on geocell reinforced sand. Sci Iran 24(1):96–109

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boiko IL, Alhassan M (2013) Effect of vertical cross-sectional shape of foundation on settlement and bearing capacity of soils. In: Procedia engineering 2013: 11th international conference on modern building materials, structures and techniques, vol 57, pp 207–212

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chirajyoti Doley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Doley, C., Das, U.K., Shukla, S.K. (2020). Effect of Cell Height and Infill Density on the Performance of Geocell-Reinforced Beds of Brahmaputra River Sand. In: Kanwar, V., Shukla, S. (eds) Sustainable Civil Engineering Practices. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 72. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3677-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3677-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3676-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3677-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics