Advertisement

DEB: A Delay and Energy-Based Routing Protocol for Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Algorithms for Intelligent Systems book series (AIS)

Abstract

This paper presents a delay and energy-based (DEB) routing protocol for the cognitive radio ad hoc networks (CRAHN). In the proposed system, a clustering approach is considered to divide the network, where the cluster formation is based on spatial variations of the spectrum availability. Once the cluster-based network is formed, the proposed protocol enables any source node to search and establish an efficient route to the destination node. Defined as a weighted graph problem, the proposed DEB routing protocol considers delay and energy to be the routing metric. Therefore, a link weight is measured through switching and queuing delay of the nodes along with their residual energy. It is anticipated that the proposed protocol selects stable paths while ensuring fast data delivery. The performance of the DEB protocol has been assessed through simulation and compared the results with existing protocols. It is observed that DEB exhibits better performance by outdoing the other protocols.

Keywords

Cognitive radio ad hoc networks Clustering Routing protocol 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen T, Zhang H, Zhou X, Maggio GM, Chlamtac I (2007) CogMesh: a cluster based cognitive radio mesh network. Cogn Wirel Netw 657–678.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5979-7_34
  2. 2.
    Krishnamurthy S, Thoppian M, Venkatesan S, Prakash R (n.d.) Control channel based MAC-layer configuration, routing and situation awareness for cognitive radio networks. In: MILCOM 2005—2005 IEEE military communications conference.  https://doi.org/10.1109/milcom.2005.1605725
  3. 3.
    Li X, Hu F, Zhang H, Zhang X (2013) A cluster-based MAC protocol for cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Wirel Pers Commun 69(2):937–955Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ma H, Zheng L, Ma X, Luo Y (2008) Spectrum aware routing for multi-hop cognitive radio networks with a single transceiver. In: 2008 3rd international conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communications (CrownCom 2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/crowncom.2008.4562509
  5. 5.
    Mansoor N, Islam AK, Zareei M, Vargas-Rosales C (2018) RARE: a spectrum aware cross-layer MAC protocol for cognitive radio ad-hoc networks. IEEE Access 6:22210–22227.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2807781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansoor N, Muzahidul Islam AK, Zareei M, Baharun S, Wakabayashi T, Komaki S (2014) Cognitive radio ad-hoc network architectures: a survey. Wirel Pers Commun 81(3):1117–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-2175-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mansoor N, Islam AK, Zareei M, Baharun S, Komaki S (2014) A stable cluster-based architecture for cognitive radio ad-hoc networks. In: TENCON 2014—2014 IEEE region 10 conference.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tencon.2014.7022403
  8. 8.
    Mansoor N, Islam AK, Zareei M, Baharun S, Komaki S (2013) Spectrum aware cluster-based architecture for cognitive radio ad-hoc networks. In: 2013 2nd international conference on advances in electrical engineering (ICAEE).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icaee.2013.6750329
  9. 9.
    Mitola J, Maguire G (1999) Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal. IEEE Pers Commun 6(4):13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1109/98.788210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahman MA (2013) Cognitive radio ad-hoc networks: a routing perspective. Dissertation, University of Naples Federico II, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Youssef M, Ibrahim M, Abdelatif M, Chen L, Vasilakos AV (2013) Routing metrics of cognitive radio networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(1):92–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (ULAB)DhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations