Skip to main content

Agricultural Land Markets in India: A Case of Maharashtra

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Land and Livelihoods in Neoliberal India
  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

By examining the changing land sale market in six villages of Maharashtra, in the context of legal restrictions on the purchase of agricultural land by non-agriculturists, the chapter reports a sudden rise in land prices during the late reforms period, i.e. 2001 to 2017. This rise in land prices is unrelated to the net return from the land and is instead caused by demands from non-cultivating households and speculative trading. The purchased land by the non-cultivators is mostly left fallow or is leased-out. Such changes tend to exclude the small cultivators and will have an adverse impact on the equity and inclusiveness in agriculture. The legal restriction on the purchase of agricultural land by the non-agricultural households seems to have limited effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The average price of agricultural land per acre in India is close to the price of Illinois, a high-productive corn-belt state in the United States, and is more than the average prices in Spain, France and Germany. But the productivity of land in India is much lower than in the above countries (Chakravarty 2013).

  2. 2.

    Section 63 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 barred transfer of Agricultural lands to Non-Agriculturist without the permission of the Collector or Officer authorized by the State Government. Later on, with the effect of an amendment, section 63-1A provided for transfer of Agricultural land to Non-Agriculturist for bonafide industrial use and for special township projects, notwithstanding the bar u/s 63 of the Act.

  3. 3.

    The extent of agricultural land sale is the percentage share of total agricultural land area sold in total cultivable area (net sown area plus total fallow land) during an agricultural year in the village. This explains the intensity of sale market for agricultural land in the village.

  4. 4.

    Rawal (2001) in West Bengal (1.7 per cent), Sarap (1998) in Madhya Pradesh (1.23 per cent), Sarap (1996) in Haryana (0.273 per cent), Dreze etc. all (1997) in Bihar (1.70 per cent).

  5. 5.

    The annual net income on the unit land is calculated as surplus over A2 cost that is total annual output value minus total annual paid-out cost on a unit area of land.

  6. 6.

    For the purpose of simplicity, the calculation avoids the interest component of the income from the land.

  7. 7.

    As per section 10(1) in Income Tax Act 1961, agricultural income earned by the taxpayer in India is exempt from tax.

References

  • Bardhan, P. K. (1984). Land, Labour and Rural Poverty: Essays in Development Economics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (1986). The Market for Land: An Analyis of Interim Transaction. Journal of Development Economics, 20(1), 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri, A. (1983). Economic Structure of Backward Agriculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H., Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (1993). Agricultural Land Relations in the Developing World. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(5), 1242–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhue, C., & Vijay, R. (2016). Importance of Landowning Non-cultivating Households: Some More Evidence. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(25), 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. R., & Barham, B. L. (1996). Level Playing Fields and Laissez Faire: Postliberal Development Strategy in Inegalitarian Agrarian Economies. World Development, 24(7), 1133–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00026-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. (1981). Risk and Insurance: Perspectives on Fertility and Agrarian Change in India and Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 7(3), 435–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorty, S. (2013). A New Price Regime: Land Markets in Urban and Rural India. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(17), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K., Jin, S., & Nagarajan, H. K. (2007). Determinants and Consequences of Land Sales Market Participation: Panel Evidence from India (WPS No. 4323). Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J. (1997). Palanpur 1957–93: Occupational Changes, Land Ownership and Social Inequality. In J. Breman, P. Kloos, & A. Saith (Eds.), The Village in Asia: Revisited (pp. 126–174). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran, M., & Kotwal, A. (1985). A Theory of Two-Tier Labor Markets in Agrarian Economies. The American Economic Review, 75(1), 162–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirashima, S. (2008). The Land Market in Development: A Case Study of Punjab in Pakistan and India. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(42), 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K. (1966). A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, G., & Pandey, V. K. (2009). Poverty Alleviation: Relative Roles of Land Lease and Sale Market in a Prosperous Part of UP. In D. N. Reddy (Ed.), Agrarian Reforms, Land Markets and Rural Poor (pp. 190–203). Mussoorie: Centre for Rural Studies, LBSNAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1970). The Nationalisation of Land. In K. Marx & F. Engels (Eds.), Selected Works in Three Volumes, Volume Two (pp. 288–290). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. M. (1972). Land Transfers in Rural Communities: Some Findings in a Ryotwari Region. Economic and Political Weekly, 7(40), A133–A144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawal, V. (2001). Agrarian Reform and Land Markets: A Study of Land Transactions in Two Villages of West Bengal, 1977–1995. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(3), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1086/452518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saith, A., & Tankha, A. (1997). Longitudinal Analysis of Structural Change in a North Indian Village, 1970–87. In P. Kloos & A. Saith (Eds.), The Village in Asia: Revisited (pp. 79–125). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarap, K. (1991). Interlinked Agrarian Markets in Rural India. New Delhi: Sage Publications India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarap, K. (1996). Land Market Transactions in Rural Haryana. Economic & Political Weekly, 31(39), A106–A115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarap, K. (1998). On the Operation of the Land Market in Backward Agriculture: Evidence from a Village in Orissa, Eastern India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 25(2), 102–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066159808438668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shergill, H. S. (1986). Land Sales and Land Prices in Punjab: 1952–53 to 1978–79. Economic & Political Weekly, 21(38–39), A125–A128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G. (2007). Growth of Indian Agriculture: A District Level Study. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoodle, L., Golden, B., & Featherstone, A. (2006). Factors Influencing Kansas Agricultural Farm Land Values. Land Economics, 82(1), 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay, R. (2002). Land Market Activity: A Framework. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(4), 714–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay, R. (2009). Land Markets, Agrarian Structure and Poverty in Andhra Pradesh. In D. N. Reddy (Ed.), Agrarian Reforms, Land Markets and Rural Poor (pp. 240–270). Mussoorie: Centre for Rural Studies, LBSNAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay, R. (2012). Structural Retrogression and Rise of ‘New Landlords’ in Indian Agriculture: An Empirical Exercise. Economic & Political Weekly, 47(5), 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is part of ICSSR-sponsored project on “Land Markets, Rising Agricultural Land Prices and Implications for Agricultural and Allied Productive Activities: A Comparative Study of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rao, C.S. (2020). Agricultural Land Markets in India: A Case of Maharashtra. In: Mishra, D., Nayak, P. (eds) Land and Livelihoods in Neoliberal India. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3511-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3511-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3510-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3511-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics