Skip to main content

Biocement: A Novel Approach in the Restoration of Construction Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Concrete is the most commonly used construction material worldwide for the development of durable structures. Structural integrity and design of buildings have become increasingly important in construction engineering as well as assessment of mixed formulation including cement and aggregate (i.e. sand, slag and stone). Microcrack formation on concrete may result in increased degradation and porous concrete. Therefore, there is a need to preserve and maintain concrete structures due to its high associated cost of restoration. In addition, reducing the negative environmental impact due to high CO2 emissions during cement production need to be considered as well. One key solution includes bio-based self-healing techniques. Research has focused on biomineralisation, a method of sealing microcracks using bacterial calcium carbonate deposits, via a common process of biocementation or microbiologically induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP). As such, these deposits possess promising micro-bonding and pore-filling macro-effects for potential application in the construction industry. In view of these novel state-of-the-art techniques, this chapter provides an overview of potential microbes, mode of action of the self-healing process, primary limitations for future techniques and potential applications in the construction industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abo-El-Enein SA, Ali AH, Talkhan FN, Abdel-Gawwad HA (2013) Application of microbial biocementation to improve the physico-mechanical properties of cement mortar. HBRC J 9:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Mukherjee A (2015) A review of microbial precipitation for sustainable construction. Constr Build Mater 93:1224–1235

    Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Pan X (2014) Influence of calcium sources on microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation by Bacillus sp. CR2. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Mukherjee A, Basu PC, Reddy MS (2009) Strain improvement of Sporosarcina pasteurii for enhanced urease and calcite production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:981–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Mukherjee A, Reddy MS (2010) Biocalcification by Sporosarcina pasteurii using corn steep liquor as the nutrient source. Ind Biotechnol 6:170–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Mukherjee A, Kumari D, Zhang Q (2015) Biomineralization for sustainable construction – a review of processes and applications. Earth-Sci Rev 148:1–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Achal V, Mukherjee A, Zhang Q (2016) Unearthing ecological wisdom from natural habitats and its ramifications on development of biocement and sustainable cities. Landsc Urban Plan 155:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbu P, Kang CH, Shin YJ, So JS (2016) Formations of calcium carbonate minerals by bacteria and its multiple applications. Springerplus 5:250–262

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anitha V, Abinaya K, Prakash S, Seshagiri Rao A, Vanavil B (2018) Bacillus cereus KLUVAA mediated biocement production using hard water and urea. Chem Biochem Eng Q 32:257–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ariyanti D, Handayani NA, Hadiyanto (2012) Feasibility of using microalgae for biocement production through biocementation. J Bioprocess Biotech 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Belie ND, Muynck WD (2009) Crack repair in concrete using biodeposition. In: Proceedings of the international conference on concrete repair, rehabilitation and retrofitting, pp 291–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben Omar N, Arias JM, Gonzalez-Munoz MT (1997) Extracellular bacterial mineralization within the context of geomicrobiology. Microbiologia 13:161–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci NA, Ghazanfari E, Lu H (2016) Microbially-induced calcite precipitation for sealing rock fractures. In Geo-Chicago, Chicago, pp 558–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso R, Pires I, Duarte SO, Monteiro GA (2018) Effects of clay’s chemical interactions on biocementation. Appl Clay Sci 156:96–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chu J (2016) Solutions to sustainability in construction: some examples. Procedia Eng 145:1127–1134

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu J, Ivanov V, He J, Maeimi M, Wu S (2015) Use of biogeotechnologies for soil improvement. In: Ground improvement case histories. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 571–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable M, Charlton M, Jensen F, Mcdonald K, Craig G, Taylor KW (2003) An ecological risk assessment of ammonia in the aquatic environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:527–548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong JT, Soga K, Kavazanjian E, Burns S, Van Paassen, Bang SS et al (2013) Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges. Geotechnique 63:287–301

    Google Scholar 

  • De Muynck W, Cox K, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2008) Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Constr Build Mater 22:875–885

    Google Scholar 

  • De Muynck DW, Belie DN, Verstraete W (2010) Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. J Ecol Eng 36:118–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhami NK, Reddy MS, Mukherjee A (2012) Improvement in strength properties of ash bricks by bacterial calcite. Ecol Eng 39:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick J, De Windt W, De Graef B, Saveyn H, Van der Meeren P, De Belie N et al (2006) Bio-deposition of a calcium carbonate layer on degraded limestone by Bacillus species. Biodegradation 17:357–367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flatt RJ, Roussel N, Cheeseman CR (2012) Concrete: an eco material that needs to be improved. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:2787–2798

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P, Mandal S, Chattopadhyay BD, Pal S (2005) Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 35:1980–1983

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh P, Mandal S, Pal S, Bandyopadhyaya G, Chattopadhyay BD (2006) Development of bioconcrete material using an enrichment culture of novel thermophilic anaerobic bacteria. Indian J Exp Biol 44:336–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Chattopadhyay BD, Mandal S (2008) Use of hot spring bacteria for remediation of cracks and increment of durability of structures. Indian Concr J 1:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Biswas M, Chattopadhyay BD, Mandal S (2009) Microbial activity on the microstructure of bacteria modified mortar. J Cem Concr Compos 31:93–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammes F, Verstraete W (2002) Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial carbonate precipitation. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:3–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini MM, Shao Y, Whalen JK (2011) Biocement production from silicon-rich plant residues: perspectives and future potential in Canada. Biosyst Eng 110:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Ye G, Qian C, Schlangen E (2016) Self-healing in cementitious materials: materials, methods and service conditions. Mater Des 92:499–511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iezzi B, Brady R, Sardag S, Eu B, Skerlos S (2019) Growing bricks: assessing biocement for lower embodied carbon structures. Procedia CIRP 80:470–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwan JM, Teddy T (2017) An overview of bacterial concrete on concrete durability in aggressive environment. Pertanika J Sci Technol 25:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwan JM, Anneza LH, Othman N, Alshalif AF, Zamer MM, Teddy T (2017) Mechanical properties of concrete with Enterococcus faecalis and calcium lactate. Procedia Eng 171:592–597

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov V, Stabnikov V (2016) Construction biotechnology: biogeochemistry, microbiology and biotechnology of construction materials and processes. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan P (2018) Studies on the mechanical properties of bacterial concrete with two bacterial species. Mater Today Proc 5:8875–8879

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jala S, Goyal D (2006) Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production-a review. Bioresour Technol 97:1136–1147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jian C, Ivanov V (2009) Biocement – a new sustainable and energy saving material for construction and waste treatment. Civil Eng Res 7:53–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers HM (2007) Self-healing concrete: a biological approach. In: Self healing materials. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers HM (2011) Bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Heron 56(1/2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers HM (2018) Bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36:230–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Jroundi F, Schiro M, Ruiz-Agudo E, Elert K, Martín-Sánchez I, González-Muñoz MT, Rodriguez-Navarro C (2017) Protection and consolidation of stone heritage by self-inoculation with indigenous carbonatogenic bacterial communities. Nat Commun 8:279

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Khanafari A, Khams FN, Sepahy AA (2011) An investigation of biocement production from hard water. Middle-East J Sci Res 7:964–971

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoben W (2011) Bacteria care for concrete. Mater Today 14:444

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsov A, Larionov D, Stepu A, Kuznetsov V, Putlayev V, Ivanov V (2009) Calcium phosphate scaffolds fabricated via chemical bonding technique from different precursors. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik: Entwicklung, Fertigung, Prüfung, Eigenschaften und Anwendungen technischer Werkstoffe 40:277–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasheras-Zubiate M, Navarro-Blasco I, Fernández JM, Alvarez JI (2012) Effect of the addition of chitosan ethers on the fresh state properties of cement mortars. Cem Concr Compos 34:964–973

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Ha HS, Lee CH, Lee YB, Kim PJ (2006) Fly ash effect on improving soil properties and rice productivity in Korean paddy soils. Bioresour Technol 97:1490–1497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Csetenyi L, Paton G, Gadd GM (2015a) CaCO3 and SrCO3 bioprecipitation by fungi isolated from calcareous soil. Environ Microbiol 17:3082–3089

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li MM, Kawasaki S, Zhang QZ, Achal V (2015b) Novel microbial based low energy green building material production technology. J Adv Mater Res 1090:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Fang C, Kawasaki S, Achal V (2018) Fly ash incorporated with biocement to improve strength of expansive soil. Sci Rep 8:25–65

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Cuevas J, Vargas-Gutiérrez G, Rodríguez-Galicia JL, Rendón-Angeles JC (2018) Effect of some organic binders on the mechanical strength of hydroxyapatite-based biocements. MRS Adv 3:3729–3734

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Zhou S (2007) High strength biological cement composition and using the same. US Patent, US 2007/0098811 A1

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhar S, Gourav S (2015) A review paper on self healing concrete. J Civil Eng Res 5:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo M, Qian CX, Li RY (2015) Factors affecting crack repairing capacity of bacteria based self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 87:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsali S, Isildar GY, Tahni A (2019) The application of bacteria as a main factor in self-healing concrete technology. J Build Pathol Rehabil 4:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad NZ, Shafaghat A, Keyvanfar A, Majid MZA, Ghoshal SK, Yasouj SEM, Shirdar MR (2016) Tests and methods of evaluating the self-healing efficiency of concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 112:1123–1132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Achal V (2014) A biological route for producing low energy binders. In: 23rd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM23), pp 9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeimi M, Haddad A (2018) Investigation on the environmental impact of soil improvement techniques: comparison of cement grouting and biocement. In: GeoShanghai international conference. Springer, pp 483–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville AM (1996) Properties of concrete. Pearson higher education, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Noshi CI, Schubert JJ (2018) Self-healing biocement and its potential applications in cementing and sand-consolidation jobs: a review targeted at the oil and gas industry. In SPE liquids-rich basins Conference-North America. The Society of Petroleum Engineers

    Google Scholar 

  • Omoregie AI, Khoshdelnezamiha G, Senian N, Ong DEL, Nissom PM (2017) Experimental optimisation of various cultural conditions on urease activity for isolated Sporosarcina pasteurii strains and evaluation of their biocement potentials. Ecol Eng 109:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco-Torgal F, Labrincha JA (2013) Biotech cementitious materials: some aspects of an innovative approach for concrete with enhanced durability. Constr Build Mater 40:1136–1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmar S, Marjadi D (2017) Bio cementation: a novel technique and approach towards sustainable material. World J Res Rev 4:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Phung QT, Maes N, Schutter GD, Jacques D, Ye G (2013) Determination of water permeability of cementitious materials using a controlled constant flow method. Constr Build Mater 47:1488–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian CX, Wang JY, Wang RX, Cheng L (2009) Corrosion protection of cement-based building materials by surface deposition of CaCO3 by Bacillus pasteurii. Mater Sci Eng C 29:1273–1280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using microorganisms. ACI Mater J 98:3–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MS, Joshi S (2018) Carbon dioxide sequestration on biocement-based composites. In: Carbon dioxide sequestration in cementitious construction materials. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 225–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy S, Manjusha A, Arun Kumar M (2015) Bio cement–an eco-friendly construction material. Int J Curr Eng Technol 5:2277–4106

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong H, Qian CX (2012) Characterization of microbe cementitious materials. Chin Sci Bull 57:1333–1338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roselló J, Soriano L, Santamarina MP, Akasaki JL, Melges JLP, Payá J (2015) Microscopy characterization of silica-rich agrowastes to be used in cement binders: bamboo and sugarcane leaves. Microsc Microanal 21:1314–1326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlangen HEJG, Jonkers HM, Qian S, Garcia A (2010) Recent advances on self healing of concrete. In: FraMCos-7: proceedings of the 7th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures, Jeju Island, Korea, 23–28 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikder A, Saha P (2019) Effect of bacteria on performance of concrete/mortar: a review. Int J Recent Technol Eng 7(6C2):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner HCW, Jahren AH (2004) Biomineralization. In: Biogeochemistry (Treatise on geochemistry, vol 8) (Schlesinger WH (ed)) 8:117–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Song JS, Mante FK, Romanow WJ, Kim S (2006) Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray ProRoot MTA, white ProRoot MTA, and gray MTA-Agelus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102:809–815

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stabnikov V (2016) Production of bioagent for calcium-based biocement. Int J Biotechnol Wellness Ind 5:60–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stabnikov V, Ivanov V (2016) Biotechnological production of biopolymers and admixtures for eco-efficient construction materials. In: Biopolymers and biotech admixtures for eco-efficient construction materials. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Stabnikov V, Naeimi M, Ivanov V, Chu J (2011) Formation of water-impermeable crust on sand surface using biocement. Cem Concr Res 41:1143–1149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temitopeab KJ, Olubunmiac OK, Olugbengaad A (2015) Strength of bamboo leaf ash and pulverized burnt clay waste blended cement concrete. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 12:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Thawadi SA, Ruwisch RC (2012) Calcium carbonate crystals formation by ureolytic bacteria isolated from Australian soil and sludge. J Adv Sci Eng Res 2:12–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittelboom KV, Belie ND, Muynck WD, Verstraete W (2010) Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Cem Concr Res 40:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasanthabharathi V (2017) Review on eco-friendly construction biotechnology. Int J Microbiol Res 8:25–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vashisht R, Attri S, Sharma D, Shukla A, Goel G (2018) Monitoring biocalcification potential of Lysinibacillus sp. isolated from alluvial soils for improved compressive strength of concrete. Microbiol Res 207:226–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veerappan K, Chandru P (2016) A brief review on biocement based concrete. Int J Eng Manage Res 6:142–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira MC, Klemm D, Einfeldt L, Albrecht G (2005) Dispersing agents for cement based on modified polysaccharides. Cem Concr Res 35:883–890

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay K, Murmu M, Deo SV (2017) Bacteria based self healing concrete-a review. Constr Build Mater 152:1008–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Voicu G, Badanoiu AI, Andronescu E (2016) Biocements with potential endodontic use. In: Nanobiomaterials in dentistry. William Andrew Publishing, Kidlington/Oxford, pp 79–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Van Tittelboom K, De Belie, Verstraete W (2012) Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 26:532–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei S, Cui H, Jiang Z, Liu H, He H, Fang N (2015) Biomineralization processes of calcite induced by bacteria isolated from marine sediments. Braz J Microbiol 46:455–464

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Yao W, Jiang Z (2014) Non-ureolytic bacterial carbonate precipitation as a surface treatment strategy on cementitious materials. J Mater Civ Eng 26:983–991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Wang X, Zuo J, Liu X (2018) Self-healing of concrete cracks by ceramsite-loaded microorganisms. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2018:5153041

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks for the support of the Ministry of Education (MoE) and UTM-RMC (Malaysia) through HICoE Grant No. RJ130000.7846.4 J262.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hesham El Enshasy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

El Enshasy, H. et al. (2020). Biocement: A Novel Approach in the Restoration of Construction Materials. In: Yadav, A., Rastegari, A., Gupta, V., Yadav, N. (eds) Microbial Biotechnology Approaches to Monuments of Cultural Heritage. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3401-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics