Skip to main content

Optimal Features Subset Selection for Large for Gestational Age Classification Using GridSearch Based Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation Scheme

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontier Computing (FC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 551))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the large for gestational age infant’s classification and prediction, noisy features are distilled to improve the classifier performance. It is accomplished with the creation of a suitable feature vector followed by GridSearch-based Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) scheme. It attempts to elect features that are influential and independent. We executed experiments on the data obtained from the National Pregnancy and Examination Program of China (2010–2013). The results are compared with the results already reported in the literature. The GridSearch-based RFECV scheme exhibited smaller features subset size with an increased classifier performance. The precision and area under the curve (AUC) scores are drastically improved from 0.7134 and 0.7074 to 0.96 to 0.86 respectively. Therefore, pediatricians are suggested to use fifty-three features subset, ranked by GridSearch-based RFECV scheme using Support Vector Machine (SVM) for the establishment of an efficient LGA prognosis process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Skou, J., Kesmodel, U., Henriksen, T.B., Secher, N.J.: An increasing proportion of infants weight more than 4000 grams at birth. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 80(10), 931–936 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Das, U.S.G., Sysyn, G.D.: Abnormal fetal growth: intrauterine growth retardation, small for gestational age, large for gestational age. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 51(3), 639–654 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vasileios, G., Eleni, E., Anna, C., Dimitrios, K., Aikaterini, D., Styliani, A.: Serum adiponectin and leptin levels and insulin resistance in children born large for gestational age are affected by the degree of overweight. Clin. Endocrinol. 66(3), 353–359 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Langer, O.: Fetal macrosomia: etiologic factors. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 43(2), 283–297 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battaglia, F.C., Lubchenco, L.O.: A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J. Pediatr. 71(2), 159–163 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boulet, S.L., Alexander, G.R., Salihu, H.M., Pass, M.: Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 188(5), 1372–1378 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raio, L., Ghezzi, F., Naro, E.D., Buttarelli, M., Franchi, M., Drig, P., Brhwiler, H.: Perinatal outcome of fetuses with a birth weight greater than 4500 g: an analysis of 3356 cases. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 109(2), 160–165 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shen, Y., Zhao, W., Lin, J., Liu, F.: Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation prior to delivery in a Chinese han population. J. Clin. Ultrasound 45(8), 465–471 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blue, N.R., Jmp, Y., Holbrook, B.D., Nirgudkar, P.A., Mozurkewich, E.L.: Abdominal circumference alone versus estimated fetal weight after 24 weeks to predict small or large for gestational age at birth: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Perinatol. 34(11), 1115–1124 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, G.S., Kneitel, A.W., Walker, C.K., Gilbert, W.M., Xing, G.: Autism risk in small- and large-for-gestational-age infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206(4), 314.e1–314.e9 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akhtar, F., Li, j., Yu, G., Imran, A., Azeem, M.: Monitoring bio-chemical indicators using machine learning techniques for an effective large for gestational age prediction model with reduced computational overhead. In: The 7th International Conference on Frontier Computing (FC 2018) - Theory, Technologies and Applications (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akhtar, F., Li, J., Azeem, M., Chen, S., Pan, H., Wang, Q., Yang, J.J.: Effective large for gestational age prediction using machine learning techniques with monitoring biochemical indicators. J. Supercomput. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-02738-w

  13. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12(10), 2825–2830 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, S., Wang, Q., Shen, H.: Design implementation and significance of Chinese free pre-pregnancy eugenics checks project. Natl. Med. J. China 95(3), 162–165 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adankon, M.M., Cheriet, M., Biem, A.: Semisupervised least squares support vector machine. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 20(12), 1858–1870 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bammann, K.: Statistical models: theory and practice. Biometrics 62(3), 943–943 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo, L., Yang, J.J., Peng, L., Li, J., Liang, Q.: A computer-aided healthcare system for cataract classification and grading based on fundus image analysis. Comput. Ind. 69, 72–80 (2015). Special Issue: Information Technologies for Enhanced Healthcare

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, J., Lu, L., Sun, J., Mo, H., Yang, J.J., Shi, C., Liu, H., Wang, Q., Hui, P.: Comparison of different machine learning approaches to predict small for gestational age infants. IEEE Trans. Big Data PP(99), 1–14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, J., Zhao, S., Yang, J., Huang, Z., Liu, B., Chen, S., Pan, H., Wang, Q.: WCP-RNN: a novel RNN-based approach for bio-NER in Chinese EMRs. J. Supercomput. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-2229-x

  20. Akhtar, F., Li, j., Pei, Y., Azeem, M.: A semi-supervised technique for LGA prognosis. In: Proceedings of The International Workshop on Future Technology FUTECH 2019, pp. 36–37 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study is supported by the Beijing Nature Science Foundation of China(Z160003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faheem Akhtar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akhtar, F., Li, J., Pei, Y., Xu, Y., Rajput, A., Wang, Q. (2020). Optimal Features Subset Selection for Large for Gestational Age Classification Using GridSearch Based Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation Scheme. In: Hung, J., Yen, N., Chang, JW. (eds) Frontier Computing. FC 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 551. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3250-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics