Abstract
The objective of the paper is to share the application of the Five Models of Academic Developer Practice (Popovic & Plank, 2016) in preparing strong educators for applied learning. In our case study, we share our application of the five different models, which include i) Grassroot, ii) Faculty-led, iii) Strategic, iv) Community Building and v) Research-led. Under Grassroot, regular lunch-time seminars and workshops are organised to draw best practices and development to different pedagogies for applied learning. Faculty members are encouraged to actively share their teaching practices and how they assess applied learning. For Faculty-led initiatives, support is given to organising trainings that are often discipline or programme specific. Under the Strategic model, we work with management to draft policies that affect teaching and learning, organizing faculty retreats, and creating opportunities for faculty to attend conferences that are aligned with our strategic directions for applied learning. As part of Community Building, several communities of practices are run regularly, either face-to-face or through online platforms. Through grants and support for research, scholarship of teaching and learning is ignited specific to applied learning. A comprehensive model enables the consideration of different approaches to reach out to academic staff from varying backgrounds, interests and needs. Instead of random topics, it is important to align our development efforts with applied learning methods that prepare students to be work ready upon graduation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 25–48.
Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching: Exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry based learning. In R. Barnette (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching. McGraw Hill and Open University Press.
Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. New York: Routledge.
Popovic, C., & Plank, K. M. (2016). Managing and leading change. In D. Baume & C. Popovic (Eds.), Advancing practice in academic development (pp. 207–224). New York, NY: Routledge.
Trowler, P., & Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practice in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational development programmes. Higher Education Research and Development, 21(2), 221–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, S.M., Foo, Y.L., Loh, H.T. (2020). Application of Five Models of Academic Developer Practice to Develop Educators for Applied Learning. In: Hong, C., Ma, W. (eds) Applied Degree Education and the Future of Work. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3142-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3142-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3141-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3142-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)