Advertisement

A Proposal for the Work Engagement Development Canvas Contributing to the Development of Work Engagement

Conference paper
  • 235 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1189)

Abstract

Employee engagement is positively and significantly related to their productivity, creativity, innovativeness, customer service as well as in-role and extra-role behaviors. The purpose of this study is to propose the Work Engagement Develop Canvas (WEDC), which aims to enhance employee work engagement. The evaluation method of this study is to check outputs where participants described the WEDC as well as to collect two types of questionnaires: A Pre-implementation questionnaire and a post-implementation questionnaire. Additionally, the evaluation is carried out by (1) Checking the output (2) Paired t-test, and (3) Open Coding. The novelty of this study is to focus on enhancing work engagement through the visualization of employees’ own thoughts.

Keywords

Work engagement Work Engagement Development Canvas WEDC Burnout 

References

  1. 1.
    Piyali, G., Rai, A., Singh, A., Ragini, : Support at work to fuel engagement: a study of employees of indian banking sector. Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 5(2), 1–10 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kobayashi, N., Nakamoto, A., Kawase, M., Sussan, F., Ioki, M., Shirasaka, S.: Four-layered assurance case description method using D-Case. Int. J. Jpn. Assoc. Manag. Syst. 10(1), 87–93 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamamoto, A., Kobayashi, N., Shirasaka, S.: Educational programs and practical examples for contributing to work engagement. Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 7(4), 26–47 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimazu, A.: Towards healthy workers and workplaces: from a perspective of work engagement. Jpn. Soc. Occup. Med. Traumatol. 63(4), 205–209 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakuraya, A., Shimazu, A., Imamura, K., Namba, K., Kawakami, N.: Effects of a job crafting intervention program on work engagement among Japanese employees: a pretest-posttest study. BMC Psychol. 4(1), 49 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., Bakker, A.B.: The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmative analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 3, 72–92 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shimazu, A.: Individual- and organizational-focused approaches in terms of work engagement. Jpn. J. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry (JGHP) 22(1), 20–26 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E.: The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 22(3), 309–328 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W.B.: Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J. Vocat. Behav. 74, 235–244 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hobfoll, S.E., Johnson, R.J., Ennis, N.: Resource loss, resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84(3), 632–643 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Judge, T.A., Van Vianen, A.E., De Pater, I.E.: Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes, a review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Hum. Perform. 17(3), 325–346 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rothmann, S., Storm, K.: Work engagement in the South African Police Service. In: Paper presented at the 11th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 14–17 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kitaoka, K.: Concept of burnout: where did it come from? Where will it head? J. Wellness Health Care 41(1), 1–11 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., Tag, A.: The concept of personal initiative: operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 70(2), 139–161 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., Zempel, J.: Personal initiative at work: differences between East and West Germany. Acad. Manag. J. 39(1), 37–63 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobayashi, N., Kawase, M., Shirasaka, S.: A proposal of assurance case description method for sharing a company’s vision. J. Jpn. Assoc. Manag. Syst. 34(1), 85–94 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Conger, J.A., Kanungo, R.N.: The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. Acad. Manag. Rev. 13(3), 471–482 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutermann, D., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Boer, D., Born, M., Voelpel, S.C.: How leaders affect followers’ work engagement and performance: integrating leader – member exchange and crossover theory. Br. J. Manag. 28(2), 299–314 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B.: Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Preliminary Manual [Version 1.1, December, 2004]. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zecca, G., Györkös, C., Becker, J., Massoudi, K., de Bruin, G.P., Rossier, J.: Validation of the French Utrecht Work engagement scale and its relationship with personality traits and impulsivity. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 65(1), 19–28 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kobayashi, N., Nakamoto, A., Kawase, M., Sussan, F., Shirasaka, S.: What model(s) of assurance cases will increase the feasibility of accomplishing both vision and strategy? Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res. 7(2), 1–17 (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, London (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Golafshani, N.: Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual. Rep 8(4), 597–607 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamamoto, A., Kobayashi, N., Nakada, M., Shirasaka, S.: A proposal of leader identity development canvas for contributing to developing leaders’ identity. In: 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), Toyama, Japan, pp. 707–711 (2019)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of System Design and ManagementKeio UniversityYokohama-Shi, Kohoku-KuJapan
  2. 2.The System Design and Management Research Institute of Graduate School of System Design and ManagementKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations