Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Territorial Integration of Foreigners: Social Sustainability of Host Societies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Human–Nature Relations

Part of the book series: Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements ((ACHS))

  • 423 Accesses

Abstract

The foreign population has become a structural trait of Italian society, and its territorial integration a key factor in social sustainability. Mixed couples, an emerging phenomenon in the Italian context, are leading to a change in social space and residential geography of the local environment. Encouraging an improvement in the level of territorial integration of the foreign population, by the host, plays an important role in understanding demographic changes. This chapter proposes a theoretical reflection on the importance of territorial integration of foreigners and an assessment of the dimensional effects it presents to the host societies’ social cohesion, and an empirical application to examine the relationships between foreigner residential integration and mixed couples. Results indicate that the increase in mixed couples leads to a weakening of residential segregation and therefore to greater territorial integration of the foreign population in the host society. Taking level of segregation of other ethnic groups under control, the effect of mixed couples on the level of residential segregation remains negative, while at the same time, the level of residential segregation of a given foreign community is positively correlated with other foreign community’s level of residential segregation. The territorial integration of foreigners is, thus, strongly linked to the local, social environment in context of multi-segregation. From this perspective, the growth of mixed-race couples, at least within a territorial dimension, can represent an agent of change in the social space modifying the majority and minority groups’ residential geography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zorbaugh HW (1983) The gold coast and the slum: a sociological study of Chicago’s near Northside. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Whyte WF (1993) Street corner society: the social structure of an Italian slum. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon MM (1964) Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origins. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Park RE, Burgess EW, McKenzie RD (1925) The city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enos RD (2017) The space between us: social geography and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson L, Finney N (2010) Parallel lives and ghettos in Britain: facts or myths? Geography 95:124–131

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boal FW (2013) Exclusion and inclusion: segregation and deprivation in Belfast. In: Mustered S, Ostendorf W (eds) Urban segregation and the welfare state inequality and exclusion in Western cities. Routledge, London, pp 94–109

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips D (2006) Parallel lives? Challenging discourses of British Muslim self-segregation. Environ Plan D Soc Sp 24:25–40. https://doi.org/10.1068/d60j

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolt G, van Kempen R, van Ham M (2008) Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy. Urban Stud 45:1359–1384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008090678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolt G, Özüekren AS, Phillips D (2010) Linking integration and residential segregation. J Ethn Migr Stud 36:169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903387238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barth F (1969) Ethnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of culture difference. The Little, Brown and Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Musterd S (2003) Segregation and integration: a contested relationship. J Ethn Migr Stud 29:623–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000123422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams DR, Collins C (2001) Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Rep 116:404–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/116.5.404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nijkamp P, Poot J (2015) Cultural diversity: a matter of measurement. Discuss Pap Ser Inst Study Labor No 8782:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Ham M, Manley D (2009) Social housing allocation, choice and neighbourhood ethnic mix in England. J Hous Built Environ 24:407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9158-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colantonio A (2009) Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods Book section Social sustainability: a review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods. In: SUE-Mot conference 2009: second international conference on whole life urban sustainability and its assessment: conference proceedings, pp 865–885

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eizenberg E, Jabareen Y (2017) Social sustainability: a new conceptual framework. Sustainability 9:68. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vallance S, Perkins HC, Dixon JE (2011) What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 42:342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2011.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. James P (2015) Urban sustainability in theory and practice: circles of sustainability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strozza S, Benassi F, Ferrara R, Gallo G (2016) Recent demographic trends in the major Italian urban agglomerations: the role of foreigners. Spat Demogr 4:39–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0012-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Massey DS, Denton NA (1988) The dimensions of residential segregation. Soc Forces 67:281–315. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iceland J, Weinberg DH, Steinmetz E (2002) Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the US: 1980–2000. US Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martori JC, Apparicio P (2011) Changes in spatial patterns of the immigrant population of a southern European metropolis: the case of the Barcelona metropolitan area (2001–2008). Tijdschr voor Econ en Soc Geogr 102:562–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00658.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. Am Sociol Rev 20:210–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Duncan OD, Duncan B (1955) Residential distribution and occupational stratification. Am J Sociol 60:493–503. https://doi.org/10.1086/221609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Apparicio P, Forurnier E, Apparicio D (2019) Geo-segregation analyzer: a multi-platform application (Version 1.1). INRS Urbanisation Cult Soc: Spat Anal Reg Econ Lab

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cristaldi F (2002) Multiethnic Rome: toward residential segregation? GeoJournal 58:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010827.68349.9e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Busetta A, Mazza A, Stranges M (2015) Residential segregation of foreigners: an analysis of the Italian city of Palermo. Genus 71:177–198. https://doi.org/10.4402/GENUS-688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Benassi F, Lipizzi F, Strozza S (2017) Detecting Foreigners’ spatial residential patterns in urban contexts: two tales from Italy. Appl Spat Anal Policy 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-017-9243-5

  30. Benassi F, Heins F, Lipizzi F, Paluzzi E (2018) Measuring residential segregation of selected foreign groups with aspatial and spatial evenness indices. A case study. Springer, Cham, pp 189–199

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ellis M, Holloway SR, Wright R, East M (2007) The effects of mixed-race households on residential segregation. Urban Geogr 28:554–577. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.6.554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Holloway SR, Ellis M, Wright R, Hudson M (2005) Partnering ‘out’ and fitting in: residential segregation and the neighbourhood contexts of mixed-race households. Popul Space Place 11:299–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.378

  33. Iceland J, Nelson KA (2010) The residential segregation of mixed-nativity married couples. Demography 47:869–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03213731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Azzolini D, Guetto R (2016) La crescita delle unioni miste in Italia: un indicatore di integrazione o di marginalità degli immigrati? In: La società italiana e le grandi crisi economiche 1929–2016, 25–26 November 2016. University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guetto R, Azzolini D (2015) An empirical study of status exchange through migrant/native marriages in Italy. J Ethn Migr Stud 41:2149–2172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1037725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abrams RH (1943) Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection: fifty year trends in Philadelphia. Am Sociol Rev 8:288–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2085082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Clarke AC (1965) An examination of the operation of residential propinquity as a factor in mate selection. Am Sociol Rev 17:17–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morgan BS (1981) A contribution to the debate on homogamy, propinquity, and segregation. J Marriage Fam 43:909–921. https://doi.org/10.2307/351347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kalmijn M, Flap H (2001) Assortative meeting and mating: unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Soc Forces 79:1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Benassi F, Porciani L (2010) The dual demographic profile of migrants in Tuscany. Demographic aspects of migration. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 209–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. King R, Patterson G (1998) Diverse paths: the elderly British in Tuscany. Int J Popul Geogr 4:157–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1220(199806)4:2%3c157:AID-IJPG100%3e3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Alba RD, Golden RM (1986) Patterns of ethnic marriage in the united states. Soc Forces 65:202–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Merton RK (1941) Intermarriage and the social structure. Psychiatry J Study Interpers Process 4:361–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1941.11022354

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Italian National Institute of Statistics, Rome, Italy

    Federico Benassi

  2. Department of Economics, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy

    Alessia Naccarato

Authors
  1. Federico Benassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessia Naccarato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Benassi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk, Sopot, Poland

    Giuseppe T. Cirella

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Benassi, F., Naccarato, A. (2020). Territorial Integration of Foreigners: Social Sustainability of Host Societies. In: Cirella, G. (eds) Sustainable Human–Nature Relations. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3049-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation