Skip to main content

Urbanization and Population Change: Banjar Municipality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Human–Nature Relations

Abstract

There is a worldwide growing concern that increased concentration of people are moving to cities. There are numerous studies that describe and explain this phenomenon. A limited amount of research focuses on specific autonomous urban environments. Evidence on land use and population density change examines Banjar Municipality, a new autonomous city, in Indonesia. Google Earth Image Series data, an appropriate solution for tracking land use change in smaller geographic areas, is examined between 2006 and 2016. Results show an increase in urban area from 13.49 to 15.41% while agricultural land decreased from 71.22 to 69.87%. Positive observational highlights indicate urban forested areas are minimally impacted by the Municipality’s city-wide development. A small percentage of the surrounding water bodies increased as a result of the local authority building a new artificial lake. Interestingly, urban area changes mostly have occurred throughout the districts of Banjar and Langensari, not in Pataruman, which has experienced the highest increase in population in the latter decade. The underlying research focalizes on the constraints to facilitate land use within an urban corridor setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huilei L, Jian P, Yanxu L, Yi’na H (2017) Urbanization impact on landscape patterns in Beijing City, China: a spatial heterogeneity perspective. Ecol Indic 82:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Demographia (2018) Demographia world urban areas & population projections

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Bank (2016) Indonesia’s urban story

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prawatya NA (2013) Spatial development in small cities in Middle Java Province. J Wil Dan Lingkung 1:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardiwijaya VS, Sumardi TP, Suganda E, Temenggung YA (2015) Rejuvenating idle land to sustainable urban form: case study of Bandung metropolitan area, Indonesia. Procedia Environ Sci 28:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruan X, Qiu F, Dyck M (2016) The effects of environmental and socioeconomic factors on land-use changes: a study of Alberta, Canada. Environ Monit Assess 188:466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5450-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Long H, Heilig GK, Li X, Zhang M (2007) Socio-economic development and land-use change: analysis of rural housing land transition in the transect of the Yangtse River, China. Land Use Policy 24:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang Y-G, Shi K-J, Niu C-C (2016) A comparison of the means and ends of rural construction land consolidation: case studies of villagers’ attitudes and behaviours in Changchun City, Jilin Province, China. J Rural Stud 47:459–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li H, Yuan Y, Zhang X et al (2019) Evolution and transformation mechanism of the spatial structure of rural settlements from the perspective of long-term economic and social change: a case study of the Sunan region, China. J Rural Stud 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.005

  10. Yuan F, Wei YD, Chen W (2014) Economic transition, industrial location and corporate networks: remaking the Sunan Model in Wuxi City, China. Habitat Int 42:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Potere D, Schneider A, Angel S, Civco DL (2009) Mapping urban areas on a global scale: which of the eight maps now available is more accurate? Int J Remote Sens 30:6531–6558. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160903121134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadi F, Thapa RB, Helmi M, Hazarika MK (2016) Urban growth and land use: land cover modeling in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Azam M (2019) Accounting for growing urban-rural welfare gaps in India. World Dev 122:410–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Malarvizhi K, Kumar SV, Porchelvan P (2016) Use of high resolution Google Earth satellite imagery in landuse map preparation for urban related applications. Procedia Technol 24:1835–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sidhu N, Pebesma E, Câmara G (2018) Using Google Earth engine to detect land cover change: Singapore as a use case. Eur J Remote Sens 51:486–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1451782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hu Q, Wu W, Xia T et al (2013) Exploring the use of Google Earth imagery and object-based methods in land use cover mapping. Remote Sens 5:6026–6042. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5116026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Widyasamratri H, Aswad A (2017) A preliminary study: an agent-based spatial simulation of human-coastal environment interaction. In: The third international conference on coastal and delta areas, pp 593–601

    Google Scholar 

  18. Handayani W, Rudiarto I (2011) Dinamika Persebaran Penduduk Jawa Tengah: Perumusan Kebijakan Perwilayahan Dengan Metode Kernel Density. Diponegoro University

    Google Scholar 

  19. Held D, McGrew A, Goldblatt D, Perraton J (1999) Introduction in global transformations. In: Global transformations: politics, economics and culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  20. Panennungi MA (2013) Cost and benefit of globalization: lesson learned from Indonesian history

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yuniarto PR (2014) Globalization problem in Indonesia: between interest, policy and challenge. J Kaji Wil 5(29)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kis-Katos K, Sparrow R (2011) Child labor and trade liberalization in Indonesia. J Hum Resour 46:722–749. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2011.0008

  23. Keohane RO, Nye JSJ (1998) The Oxford dictionary of quotations. Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vujakovic P (2010) How to measure globalization? A new globalization index (NGI). Atl Econ J 38:237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-010-9217-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rifai M (2017) Regional autonomy and globalization: a development model study in Karawang Regency. J Polit Indones 2:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stasavage D (2014) Was Weber right? The role of urban autonomy in Europe’s rise. Am Polit Sci Rev 108:337–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paierele O (2011) Globalization impact on the local and regional development policies: Republic of Moldova case

    Google Scholar 

  28. Myerson RB (2015) Democratic decentralization and economic development. In: The Oxford handbook of Africa and economics, pp 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687114.013.18

  29. Riadi B, Barus B, Widiatmaka et al (2018) Identification of flood area in the coastal region using remote sensing in Karawang Regency, West Java. In: IOP conference series: earth and environmental science

    Google Scholar 

  30. Darmawan R (2008) The practices of decentralization in Indonesia and its implication on local competitiveness. University of Twente

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rudy, Hasyimzum Y, Heryandi, Khoiriah S (2017) 18 years of decentralization experiment in Indonesia: institutional and democratic evaluation. J Polit Law 10:132–139. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n5p132

  32. Mauro L, Pigliaru F, Carmeci G (2018) Decentralization and growth: do informal institutions and rule of law matter? J Policy Model 40:873–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ishak AF, Utomo TWW (2014) Decentralization policy and regional autonomy implementation in East Kalimantan. J Borneo Adm 6a:1–17. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v6i2.57

  34. Miller MA (2009) Rebellion and reform in Indonesia: Jakarta’s security and autonomy policies in Aceh. J Curr Southeast Asian Aff 28(4):145–151. https://doi.org/10.1159/000118017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller MA (2013) Decentralizing Indonesian city spaces as new “centers”. Int J Urban Reg Res 37:834–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2013.01209.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Phelps NA, Bunnell T, Miller MA (2011) Post-disaster economic development in Aceh: neoliberalization and other economic-geographical imaginaries. Geoforum 42:418–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodríguez-Pose A, Ezcurra R (2010) Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis. J Econ Geogr 10:619–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ludwig A, Meyer H, Nauss T (2016) Automatic classification of Google Earth images for a larger scale monitoring of bush encroachment in South Africa. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 50:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Qi F, Zhai JZ, Dang G (2016) Building height estimation using Google Earth. Energy Build 118:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.02.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Burgess EW (2008) The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. In: Urban ecology. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 71–78

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shertzer A, Twinam T, Walsh RP (2018) Zoning and the economic geography of cities. J Urban Econ 105:20–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2018.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Syaifuddin, Hamire A, Dahlan (2013) The relationship between and land use change in Somba Opu District, Gowa Regency. J Agrisistem 9:169–179

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li F, Zhang S, Bu K et al (2015) The relationships between land use change and demographic dynamics in western Jilin Province. J Geogr Sci 25:617–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-015-1191-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Russo A, Cirella G (2018) Modern compact cities: how much greenery do we need? Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2180. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brøgger D (2019) Urban diaspora space: rural-urban migration and the production of unequal urban spaces. Geoforum 102:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen T, Lang W, Chan E, Philipp CH (2018) Lhasa: urbanising China in the frontier regions. Cities 74:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge support from the China Scholarship Council, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 41471103), West Java Province Government, and Banjar Municipality Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agus Supriyadi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Supriyadi, A., Wang, T., Chu, S., Ma, T., Shaumirahman, R.G., Cirella, G.T. (2020). Urbanization and Population Change: Banjar Municipality. In: Cirella, G. (eds) Sustainable Human–Nature Relations. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3049-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics