Skip to main content

The State of Access in Cities: Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance for Urban Services

Abstract

This chapter presents a framework to analyze access to rights and services in urban settings. Following De Jong and Rizvi’s (2008) definition of access as the match between societal commitment and institutional capacity to deliver rights and services and people’s capacity to benefit from those rights and services, the chapter examines the different dimensions that underpin access in urban settings. It argues that efforts to deal with the bureaucratic dysfunction that impedes access should be grounded in an approach that looks at context, system, agency and individual levels of analysis. Such conceptual approach highlights the adaptive nature of dealing with bureaucratic dysfunction to enlarge access to urban benefits, putting an emphasis on the role of leadership in innovating to make it possible. The chapter tests these propositions by examining examples of recent innovations to manage bureaucratic dysfunction and associated lack of access from cities across the world. Some lessons are drawn from the analysis: (i) leaders who can articulate the public value proposition, can enable the necessary legitimacy and can build operational capacity are a fundamental pillar of any effort, (ii) focusing in an agency or a narrow set of agencies may leave key stakeholders out, rendering efforts to increase access unsustainable, and (iii) engaging frontline workers has to be a central part of any effort, but it cannot fail to act at the context and societal level, so that the deeper forces inhibiting access to urban benefits are deactivated in the long term.

This chapter is an adapted and expanded version of previous work by Jorrit de Jong, in particular his books Dealing with Dysfunction: innovative problem-solving in the public sector (2016), The State of Access (with G. Rizvi, 2008) and Agents of Change: Strategy and Tactics for Social Innovation (with S. Cels and F. Nauta, 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the case of the urban poor, it starts with access to even more basic assets such as housing and shelter.

  2. 2.

    According to the World Bank (2017) such policies are particularly popular in Asia and Africa, where the majority of urban growth is projected to occur. At the same time, current political developments in the US and Europe show a trend towards more restrictive immigration policies.

  3. 3.

    This example is based on a Harvard Kennedy School Case produced by Quinton Mayne and Patricia García-Ríos, Caño Martín Peña. Land Ownership and Politics Collide in Puerto Rico. HKS number 2082.0 (2016).

  4. 4.

    See, for example, http://cltnetwork.org/community-land-trusts-kenya/ and http://www.hic-gs.org/document.php?pid=2548.

  5. 5.

    https://www.sws.org.ph/downloads/media_release/pr20160311%20-%20Baseline%20Study%20Topline%20Results%20FINAL.pdf.

  6. 6.

    https://apolitical.co/solution_article/philippines-largest-city-will-fine-men-200-street-harassment/.

  7. 7.

    https://apolitical.co/solution_article/philippines-largest-city-will-fine-men-200-street-harassment/.

  8. 8.

    https://apolitical.co/solution_article/philippines-largest-city-will-fine-men-200-street-harassment/.

  9. 9.

    https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/dec/13/what-would-a-city-that-is-safe-for-women-look-like.

  10. 10.

    https://apolitical.co/solution_article/super-power-procurement-four-ways-open-contracting-is-making-cities-smart/.

  11. 11.

    https://medium.com/open-contracting-stories/the-deals-behind-the-meals-c4592e9466a2.

  12. 12.

    https://medium.com/open-contracting-stories/the-deals-behind-the-meals-c4592e9466a2.

  13. 13.

    https://medium.com/open-contracting-stories/the-deals-behind-the-meals-c4592e9466a2.

  14. 14.

    https://medium.com/open-contracting-stories/the-deals-behind-the-meals-c4592e9466a2.

References

  • Aars J, Fimreite AL (2005) Local government and governance in Norway: stretched accountability in network politics. Scand Polit Stud 28(3):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrow M (1970) Bureaucracy. Palgrave, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altshuler AA, Behn RD, Altshuler AA (1997) Innovation in American government: challenges, opportunities, and dilemmas. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor V (2005) Joined-up government. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borins S (2001) Leadership and innovation in the public sector. J Intellect Capital

    Google Scholar 

  • CAF, UN-Habitat (2014) Construction of more equitable cities: public policies for inclusion in Latin America. UN and Development Bank of Latin America (CAF), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cels S, De Jong J, Nauta F (2012) Agents of change: strategy and tactics for social innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz NF, da Rode P, McQuarrie M (2019) New urban governance: a review of current themes and future priorities. J Urban Aff 41(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong J (2016) Dealing with dysfunction: innovative problem solving in the public sector. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong J, Rizvi G (2008) The state of access. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries H, Bekkers V, Tummers L (2016) Innovation in the public sector: a systematic review and future research agenda. Public Adm 94(1):146–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni-Halevy E (2012) Bureaucracy and democracy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2017) The new urban crisis. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E (2012) Triumph of the city. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith S, Crawford S (2014) The responsive city: engaging communities through data- smart governance. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith S, Eggers WD (2005) Governing by network: the new shape of the public sector. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Habitat III (2017) The new urban agenda. Retrieved 4 Feb 2019 from http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/

  • Hajnal Z (2009) America’s uneven democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz R (1994) Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook TM, Weinschenk AC (2014) Campaigns, mobilization, and turnout in mayoral elections. Polit Res Q 67(1):42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard PK (1995) The death of common sense. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarck E (2007) The End of government as we know it: making public policy work. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz B, Nowak J (2018) The new localism: how cities can thrive in the age of populism. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettl DF (2002) The transformation of governance: public administration for twenty-first century America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruiter AJ, De Jong J (2008) Providing services to the marginalized. Anatomy of an access paradox. In: De Jong J, Rizvi G (2008) The state of access. Success and failure of democracies to create equal opportunities. Brookings, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky M (1980a) Street level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky M (1980b) Bureaucratic disentitlement in social welfare programs. Soc Sci Rev 58(1):3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore MH (1995) Creating public value: strategic management in government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti E (2012) The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos Y (2007) Problems of democratic accountability in network and multilevel governance. Eur Law J 13(4):469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters BG (1995) The politics of bureaucracy: an Introduction to comparative public administration. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C, Talbot C, Caulfield J, Smullen A (2004) Agencies—how governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Portland State University (2016) Who votes for mayor?| A project of Portland State University and the Knight Foundation. Retrieved 23 Jan 2019 from http://www.whovotesformayor.org/

  • Ribot JC, Peluso NL (2003) A theory of access*. Rural Sociol 68(2):153–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sclar ED, Lonroth M, Wolmar C (eds) (2014) Urban Access for the 21st century: finance and governance models for transport infrastructure. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen E, Torfing J (2011) Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Adm Soc 43(8):842–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow MK (1994) Imposing duties: government’s changing approach to compliance. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker G (2006) Public value management: a new narrative for networked governance? Am Rev Publ Adm 36(1):41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömblad P, Myberg G (2012) Urban inequality and political recruitment networks. Urban Stud 50(5):1049–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torfing J, Peters BG, Pierre J, Sørensen E (2012) Interactive governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trounstine J (2018) Segregation by design by Jessica Trounstine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UN Women (2017) Safe cities and safe public spaces: global results report. UN Women, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-Habitat (2010) State of the world’s cities 2010–2011. UN-HABITAT, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (1989) Bureaucracy. What government agencies do and what they do it. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2011) World development report 2012. Gender equality and development. World Bank, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2016) Evaluating digital citizen engagement: a practical guide. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2017) East Asia and Pacific cities: expanding opportunities for the urban poor. World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorrit de Jong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Jong, J., Fernandez-Monge, F. (2020). The State of Access in Cities: Theory and Practice. In: Cheema, S. (eds) Governance for Urban Services. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2973-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics