Abstract
We study two asymmetric scaling methods within the context of loglinear modelling of square contingency tables: the distance-radius model and the slide-vector model. The usual association parameters of a loglinear model are replaced by a distance term. We are specifically interested in whether and how the asymmetry in these methods translates to odds ratio structures, as the latter is a primary measure of association for contingency tables. We define models in terms of distances and squared distances. We show that the distance-radius model with distances and the slide-vector model with squared distances do not represent asymmetry in the odds ratios. Finally, we also study models without main effects, where the distances directly represent the observed frequencies. We show that in that case the distance-radius model perfectly represents marginal heterogeneity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Caussinus, H. (1965). Contribution á l’analyse statistique des tableaux de corrélation [contributions to the statistical analysis of correlation matrices]. Annals of the faculty of Science, University of Toulouse, 29, 715–720.
De Rooij, M. (2001). Distance-association model for the analysis of repeated transition frequency tables. Statistica Neerlandica, 55, 156–180.
De Rooij, M., & Heiser, W. J. (2005). Graphical representations and odds ratios in a distance-association model for the analysis of cross-classified data. Psychometrika, 70, 99–122.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Luijkx, R. (1995). Intergenerationele beroepsmobiliteit in Nederland: patronen en historische veranderingen. In J. Dronkers & W. C. Ultee (Eds.), Verschuivende ongelijkheid in Nederland (pp. 14–30). Assen: Van Gorcum.
Okada, A., & Imaizumi, T. (1987). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximities. Behaviormetrika, 21, 81–96.
Okada, A., & Imaizumi, T. (1997). Asymmetric multidimensional scaling of two-mode three-way proximities. Journal of Classification, 14, 195–224.
Timmerman, M. E. (2014). Aim at doing the wash in one go. In M. de Rooij & C. M. van Putten (Eds.), Psychology and Statistics: Ready for the future (pp. 21–24). Leiden University.
Zielman, B., & Heiser, W. J. (1993). The analysis of asymmetry by a slide-vector. Psychometrika, 58, 101–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Rooij, M. (2020). Asymmetric Scaling Models for Square Contingency Tables: Points, Circles, Arrows and Odds Ratios. In: Imaizumi, T., Nakayama, A., Yokoyama, S. (eds) Advanced Studies in Behaviormetrics and Data Science. Behaviormetrics: Quantitative Approaches to Human Behavior, vol 5. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2700-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2700-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2699-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2700-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)