Skip to main content

Individual Risk and Extremes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 387 Accesses

Part of the book series: Integrated Disaster Risk Management ((IDRM))

Abstract

In Chap. 1, we introduced the overall approach how to integrate extreme and systemic risk analysis. We discussed that a network perspective is very beneficial in that regard. We informally defined a system to be a set of individual elements which are, at least partly, interconnected with each other. We assumed that these individual elements are “at risk” and we will call such kind of risk “individual risk”. In this chapter, we assume that the risk an individual element within a network is exposed to can be represented as a random variable. Consequently, our focal point for individual risk will be a distribution function. As we are especially interested in downside risk (e.g., losses), we will frequently deal with a so-called loss distribution. For extreme risk, the tails of the distribution function are of great importance. However, for accurately estimating the tail, a theory of its own as well as corresponding techniques are needed, namely extreme value theory, which is the central topic of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow KJ, Lind RC (1978) Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. In: Uncertainty in economics. Elsevier, pp 403–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer H (2011) Measure and integration theory, vol 26. Walter de Gruyter

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas V, Hochrainer S, Mechler R, Pflug G, Linnerooth-Bayer J (2007) Sovereign financial disaster risk management: the case of Mexico. Environ Hazards 7(1):40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo E, Hadi AS, Balakrishnan N, Sarabia J-M (2005) Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles S, Bawa J, Trenner L, Dorazio P (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values, vol 208. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeckhoudt L, Gollier C (1995) Risk: evaluation, management and sharing. Harvester Wheatsheaf

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P, Klüppelberg C, Mikosch T (2013) Modelling extremal events: for insurance and finance, vol 33. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA, Tippett LHC (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. In: Mathematical proceedings of the cambridge philosophical society, vol 24. Cambridge University Press, pp 180–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnedenko B (1943) Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d’une serie aleatoire. Ann Math, 423–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel EJ (1958) Statistics of extremes, p 201. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilmann WR (1988) Fundamentals of risk theory. Verlag Versicherungswirtsch

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochrainer S (2006) Macroeconomic risk management against natural disasters. German University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochrainer S, Pflug G (2009) Natural disaster risk bearing ability of governments: consequences of kinked utility. J Nat Disaster Sci 31(1):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochrainer S, Mechler R, Pflug G, Lotsch A (2008) Investigating the Impact of climate change on the robustness of index-based microinsurance in Malawi. The World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg RV, Klugman SA (2009) Loss distributions, vol 249. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson AF (1955) The frequency distribution of the annual maximum (or minimum) values of meteorological elements. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 81(348):158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz RW, Parlange MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25(8–12):1287–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler D (2014) Why (re) insurance is not systemic. J Risk Insur 81(3):477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klugman SA, Panjer HH, Willmot GE (2012) Loss models: from data to decisions, vol 715. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz S, Nadarajah S (2000) Extreme value distributions: theory and applications. World Scientific

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter M R, Lindgren G, and Rootzén H (1983) Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer J, Hochrainer-Stigler S (2015) Financial instruments for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation. Climatic Change 133(1):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longin F (ed) (2016). Extreme events in finance: A handbook of extreme value theory and its applications. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Malevergne Y, Sornette D (2006) Extreme financial risks: from dependence to risk management. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R (2016) Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost-benefit analysis. Natural Hazards 81(3):2121–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mechler R, Bouwer LM, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Aerts JC, Surminski S, Williges K (2014) Managing unnatural disaster risk from climate extremes. Nature Climate Change 4(4):235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson S, Klotter D, Chavula G (2014) A detailed rainfall climatology for Malawi. Southern Africa Int J Climatol 34(2):315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panjer HH (2006) Operational risk: modeling analytics, vol 620. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflug G, Roemisch W (2007) Modeling, measuring and managing risk. World Scientific

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickands J III et al (1975) Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann Stati 3(1):119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss R-D, Thomas M, Reiss R (2007) Statistical analysis of extreme values, vol 2. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussas GG (1997) A course in mathematical statistics. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (2012) Applied statistics: a handbook of techniques. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl C (2013) The St. Petersburg paradox at 300. J Risk Uncertain 46(3):247–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation for the gamma distribution using data containing zeros. J Climate 3(12):1495–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel P, Eisen R (2012) Insurance economics. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hochrainer-Stigler, S. (2020). Individual Risk and Extremes. In: Extreme and Systemic Risk Analysis. Integrated Disaster Risk Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2689-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics