Amelung, N., Granja, R., & Machado, H. (2019). “We are victims of our own success”: Challenges of communicating DNA evidence to “enthusiastic”. In S. R. Davies & U. Felt (Eds.), Exploring science communication: A science and technology studies approach. London: Sage.
Amorim, A. (2002). A Espécie das Origens. Genomas, Linhagens e Recombinações. Lisbon: Gradiva.
Amorim, A. (2012). Opening the DNA black box: Demythologizing forensic genetics. New Genetics and Society, 31(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2012.687083
Amorim, A., Crespillo, M., Luque, J., Prieto, L., Garcia, O., Gusmão, L., … Pinto, N. (2016). Formulation and communication of evaluative forensic science expert opinion—A GHEP-ISFG contribution to the establishment of standards. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 25, 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.003
Aronson, J. (2007). Genetic witness: Science, law, and controversy in the making of DNA profiling. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Biedermann, A., Champod, C., & Willis, S. (2017). Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic science: The gap between intentions and perceptions. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 21(1–2), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712716674796
Bier, J. (2018). Bodily circulation and the measure of a life: Forensic identification and valuation after the Titanic disaster. Social Studies of Science, 48(5), 635–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718801173
Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2010). Media use and public perceptions of DNA evidence. Science Communication, 32(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009340343
Chow-White, P., & Duster, T. (2011). Do health and forensic DNA databases increase racial disparities? PLoS Medicine, 8(10), e1001100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001100
Cole, S. (2009). Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: The new epistemology of forensic identification. Law, Probability and Risk, 8(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgp016
Cole, S., & Dioso-Villa, R. (2007). CSI and its effects: Media, juries, and the burden of proof. New England Law Review, 41(3), 435–470.
Cole, S., & Lynch, M. (2006). The social and legal construction of suspects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.110001
Costa, S. (2017). Visibilities, invisibilities and twilight zones at the crime scene in Portugal. New Genetics and Society, 36(4), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2017.1394835
Durnal, E. (2010). Crime scene investigation (as seen on TV). Forensic Science International, 199(1–3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.015
Duster, T. (2003). Backdoor to eugenics. New York: Routledge.
Duster, T. (2006). The molecular reinscription of race: Unanticipated issues in biotechnology and forensic science. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(4–5), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220601020148
Edmond, G. (2001). The law-set: The legal-scientific production of medical propriety. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(2), 191–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600204
Gill, P. (2014). Misleading DNA evidence: Reasons for miscarriages of justice. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier.
Gill, P. (2016). Analysis and implications of the miscarriages of justice of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 23, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.02.015
Haimes, E. (2006). Social and ethical issues in the use of familial searching in forensic investigations: Insights from family and kinship studies. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00032.x
Hindmarsh, R., & Prainsack, B. (Eds.). (2010). Genetic suspects: Global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huey, L. (2010). “I’ve seen this on CSI”: Criminal investigators’ perceptions about the management of public expectations in the field. Crime, Media, Culture, 6(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659010363045
Jasanoff, S. (1995). Science at the bar. Law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (2006). Just evidence: The limits of science in the legal process. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(2), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00038.x
Kaye, D. H. (2009). Identification, individualization, uniqueness. Law, Probability and Risk, 8(2), 85–94.
Kim, J., Mammo, D., Siegel, M., & Katsanis, S. (2011). Policy implications for familial searching. Investigative Genetics, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-2-22
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA; London, UK: Harvard University Press.
Kruse, C. (2010). Producing absolute truth: CSI science as wishful thinking. American Anthropologist, 112(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01198.x
Kruse, C. (2016). The social life of forensic evidence. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Lawless, C. (2016). Forensic science: A sociological introduction. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Ley, B. L., Jankowski, N., & Brewer, P. R. (2010). Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510367571
Lynch, M. (2013). Science, truth, and forensic cultures: The exceptional legal status of DNA evidence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.09.008
Lynch, M., Cole, S., McNally, R., & Jordan, K. (2008). Truth machine: The contentious history of DNA fingerprinting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lynch, M., & Jasanoff, S. (1998). Contested identities: Science, law and forensic practice. Social Studies of Science, 28(5–6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028005001
Machado, H., & Granja, R. (2019). Police epistemic culture and boundary work with judicial authorities and forensic scientists: The case of transnational DNA data exchange in the EU. New Genetics and Society, 38(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2019.1609350
Machado, H., & Prainsack, B. (2012). Tracing technologies: Prisoners’ views in the era of CSI. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Machado, H., Santos, F., & Silva, S. (2011). Prisoners’ expectations of the national forensic DNA database: Surveillance and reconfiguration of individual rights. Forensic Science International, 210(1–3), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.020
McCartney, C. (2006). Forensic identification and criminal justice: Forensic science, justice and risk. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Murphy, E. (2007). The new forensics: Criminal justice, false certainty, and the second generation of scientific evidence. California Law Review, 95(3), 721–797.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2007). The forensic use of bioinformation: Ethical issues. London. Retrieved from https://nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/The-forensic-use-of-bioinformation-ethical-issues.pdf
Prainsack, B., & Kitzberger, M. (2009). DNA behind bars: Other ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies. Social Studies of Science, 39(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312708097289
Saks, M. J., & Koehler, J. J. (2008). The individualization fallacy in forensic science evidence. Vanderbilt University Law Review, 61(1), 199–219. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1432516
Santos, F. (2014). Making sense of the story: The dialogues between the police and forensic laboratories in the construction of DNA evidence. New Genetics and Society, 33(2), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2014.916186
Schiffer, B., & Champod, C. (2008). Judicial error and forensic science: Pondering the contribution of DNA evidence. In C. R. Huff & M. Killias (Eds.), Wrongful conviction. International perspectives on miscarriages of justice (pp. 33–55). Temple University Press.
Schweitzer, N. J., & Saks, M. J. (2007). The CSI effect: Popular fiction about forensic science affects the public’s expectations about real forensic science. Jurimetrics Journal, 47, 357–364.
Shelton, D. E., Kim, Y. S., & Barak, G. (2006). A study of juror expectations and demands concerning scientific evidence: Does the “CSI Effect” exist? Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 9(2), 331–368.
Skinner, D. (2013). “The NDNAD has no ability in itself to be discriminatory”: Ethnicity and the governance of the UK National DNA Database. Sociology, 47(5), 976–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513493539
Smith, L. A. (2017). The missing, the martyred and the disappeared: Global networks, technical intensification and the end of human rights genetics. Social Studies of Science, 47(3), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716678489
Toom, V. (2017). Finding closure, continuing bonds, and codentification after the 9/11 attacks. Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 37(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1337118
Toom, V. (2018). Cross-border exchange and comparison of forensic DNA data in the context of the Prüm Decision. Civil liberties, justice and home affairs. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2018)604971
Williams, R., & Johnson, P. (2004a). Circuits of surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 2(1), 1–14. Retrieved from https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3324/3286
Williams, R., & Johnson, P. (2004b). “Wonderment and dread”: Representations of DNA in ethical disputes about forensic DNA databases. New Genetics and Society, 23(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677042000237035
Williams, R., & Johnson, P. (2008). Genetic policing: The use of DNA in criminal investigations. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.