Advertisement

Opening Doors to Foreign Students: An Insight into the History of US Government’s Stance on International Students

  • Grace ChungEmail author
Chapter
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

On July 20, 2005, the US government provided an unprecedented and relatively uncharacteristic act by passing an “Opening Doors to Foreign Students Act.” The event that had spurred this addition to an amendment was an alarming sudden decrease in international student enrollment in the US in the years 2004–2005. This was the first time the US government had ever directly addressed the need for an active promotion of welcoming foreign students into the United States. The goal of this paper is to understand this change through a historical analysis of government’s actions on international education since World War II. In this understanding, the second goal is to explore how this sheds light to the occurrence of declining international students in the US today and the US government’s contribution to this trend. Through the exploration, the research has led to three conclusions: First, the US government has historically overlooked the international student community because politically and publicly the community had a nonthreatening nature and was systematically benefiting the US. Second, the September 11 attack was an event that caught both the public and government attention on the foreign students. The attention was dual in nature: the international student community became a potential threatening entity as well as an integral part of the US academic, economic, and political system. Third, while the very act of government’s oversight is what has allowed the international student community to become a presence to be acknowledged, moving forward, despite the Open Doors Act, regulation has been the main concern as opposed to support and “opening doors.”

Keywords

International students Student mobility Policy International education Foreign policies Government International education policy History 

References

  1. Anderson, S. (2005). International students and US policy choices. International Educator, 14(6), 24–34.Google Scholar
  2. Borjas, G. J. (2002). Rethinking foreign students. National Review, 17.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, D. (2005). International education and the impact of the ‘War on Terrorism’. Irish Studies in International Affairs, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Wit, H. (2002). Internationalization of higher education in the United States of America and Europe: A historical, comparative, and conceptual analysis. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  5. Frankel, C. (1965). Neglected aspect of Foreign affairs; American educational and cultural policy abroad.Google Scholar
  6. Fulbright, J. W. (1994). An essay in honour of jack eagle. The power of educational exchange: Essays in Honour of Jack Eagle, Council on International Educational Exchange (pp. 7–16). New York.Google Scholar
  7. IIE History. Retrieved May 03, 2017, from https://www.iie.org/Why-IIE/History.
  8. Jeffrey, H. P. (1987). Legislative origins of the Fulbright program. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 491(1), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kellermann, H. J. (1978). Cultural relations as an instrument of US Foreign policy: The educational exchange program between the United States and Germany, 1945–1954 (Vol. 8931). Department of State, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. Kramer, P. A. (2009). Is the world our campus? international students and US global power in the long twentieth century. Diplomatic History, 33(5), 775–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larson, P. T., & Gappos, J. (2005, January 30). Visa rules hurting US, warns Gates. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://www.ft.com/content/87b28092-7305-11d9-86a0-00000e2511c8.
  12. Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchanges Act of 1961. Public Law 87–256, 21 1961, Eighty-Seventh Congress, [H.R. 8666]; United States statutes at large, Library of Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. NAFSA. (2003). In America’s interest: welcoming international students. Report of the strategic task force on international student access. NAFSA: Association of International Education.Google Scholar
  14. O’Connell, K. (2018a, June 7). International education is not a Partisan issue—and congress agrees. Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/2018/6/7/international-education-is-not-a-partisan-issue/.
  15. O’Connell, K. (2018b, May 9). As enrollment declines, members of congress speak out for international students. Retrieved from http://www.nafsa.org/2018/5/9/as-enrollment-declines/.
  16. Open Doors. (2016). Enrollment trends. institute of international education. Retrieved May 03, 2017, from https://www.iie.org/Research-and-Insights/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Enrollment-Trends.
  17. Senate, U. S. (1966). International Education Act. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Labor and Public Welfare. United States Senate. In 89 th Congress, 2nd Session, September 1966.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, C. (2005, July 22). H. R. 2601–109th congress (2005–2006): Foreign relations authorization act, Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007. from https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/house-bill/2601.
  19. The history of NAFSA: Association of international educator. Retrieved May 03, 2017, from http://www.nafsa.org/About_Us/About_NAFSA/History/The_History_of_NAFSA__Association_of_International_Educators/.
  20. Tuch, H. N. (1990). Communicating with the world: US public diplomacy overseas. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Vestal, T. M. (1994). International education: Its history and promise for today. ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  22. Vogel, R. H. (1987). The making of the Fulbright program. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 491(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations