Skip to main content

Theoretical Bases of Interventions to Improve Use of Medicines and Tests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Improving Use of Medicines and Medical Tests in Primary Care
  • 430 Accesses

Abstract

Programs to improve prescribing or use of diagnostic tests must be well designed if they are to be effective. This requires an understanding of what the behaviour is, why it occurs, the context of the consultation, factors influencing the main protagonists (doctor and patient) and the wider environment. A large number of behaviour change theories have been put forward to explain prescribing behaviour and a whole series of decision-making biases are known to be important. How then can an implementation practitioner navigate this extensive literature, based strongly on psychology and design program interventions that are both achievable and likely to work? This chapter summarises important theoretical constructs and frameworks and points to three tools for use in primary care interventions: mindlines as a means of assimilation of information among general practitioners; a 360-degree assessment of the complexity of change; and a practical framework that brings together critical theoretical components into an operational tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avorn, J. (2017). Academic detailing “marketing” the best evidence to clinicians. JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(4), 361–362. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.16036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avorn, J. (2018). The psychology of clinical decision making—Implications for medication use. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378(8), 689–691. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avorn, J. L., & Soumerai, S. B. (1983). Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach, 308(24). https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198306163082406.

  • Bero, L. A., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J. M., Harvey, E., Oxman, A. D., & Thomson, M. A. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. British Medical Journal, 317(7156), 465. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465.

  • Cadogan, S. L., McHugh, S. M., Bradley, C. P., Browne, J. P., & Cahill, M. R. (2016). General practitioner views on the determinants of test ordering: A theory-based qualitative approach to the development of an intervention to improve immunoglobulin requests in primary care. Implementation Science: IS, 11, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0465-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20(4), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2014). Theories of behaviour change across disciplines: A scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 93, 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeks, L. S., Kosari, S., Boom, K., Peterson, G. M., Maina, A., Sharma, R., & Naunton, M. (2018). The role of pharmacists in general practice in asthma management: A pilot study. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy6040114.

  • Deeks, L. S., Kosari, S., & Naunton, M. (2018). Clinical pharmacists in general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 68(672), 320. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X697625.

  • Duane, S., Domegan, C., McHugh, P., & Devaney, M. (2016). From restricted to complex exchange and beyond: Social marketing’s change agenda. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9–10), 856–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1189449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Walker, A., Johnston, M., & Pitts, N. (2005). Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: The use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elshaug, A. G., Rosenthal, M. B., Lavis, J. N., Brownlee, S., Schmidt, H., Nagpal, S., … Saini, V. (2017). Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: Achieving high-value health care. The Lancet, 390(10090), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32586-7.

  • Freeman, C., Cottrell, W. N., Kyle, G., Williams, I., & Nissen, L. (2012). Does a primary care practice pharmacist improve the timeliness and completion of medication management reviews? International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 20(6), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00213.x.

  • Freeman, C. R. (2012). Pharmacists as members of the multidisciplinary general practice team: A new model of Australian pharmacy practice. The University of Queensland, School of Pharmacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. R., Cottrell, W. N., Kyle, G., Williams, I. D., & Nissen, L. M. (2012). Chronicles of a primary care practice pharmacist (Original Research) (Drug overview). Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, 1, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, J., & Le May, A. (2004). Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?”—Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. British Medical Journal, 329(7473), 1013–1016A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, J., & Le May, A. (2011). Practice-based evidence for health care: Clinical mindlines. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, J., & Le May, A. (2016). Mindlines: making sense of evidence in practice. The British Journal of General Practice, 66(649), 402–403. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X686221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbody, S., Whitty, P., Grimshaw, J., & Thomas, R. (2003). Educational and organizational interventions to improve the management of depression in primary care—A systematic review. JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 3145–3151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A., Sullivan, F., & Dowell, J. (2013). An ethnographic exploration of influences on prescribing in general practice: Why is there variation in prescribing practices? Implementation Science, 8(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations a systematic literature review. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A’Court, C., … Shaw, S. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8775.

  • Grimshaw, J. M., Thomas, R. E., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., & Vale, L. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 8(6),1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grol, R. (1997). Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. British Medical Journal, 315, 418–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grol, R. (2001). Improving the quality of medical care: Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286(20), 2578. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.20.2578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grol, R. (2010, January 29). Has guideline development gone astray? Yes. British Medical Journal, 340(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c306.

  • Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From evidence to best practice: Effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet, 362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.

  • Knight, A. W., Caesar, C., Ford, D., Coughlin, A., & Frick, C. (2012). Improving primary care in Australia through the Australian primary care collaboratives program: A quality improvement report. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(11), 948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009). Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locock, L., Dopson, S., Chambers, D., & Gabbay, J. (2001). Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Social Science and Medicine, 53(6), 745–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00387-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mant, A. (1999). Thinking about prescribing: A handbook for quality use of medicines. Sydney: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCleary, N., Ramsay, C., Francis, J., Campbell, M., & Allan, J. (2014). Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by general practitioners: A systematic review of scenario studies. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 621. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0621-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Atkins, L., & West, R. (2014). The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., & Johnston, M. (2012). Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change. Health Psychology Review, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.654964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Lawton, R., Parker, D., & Walker, A. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care, 14. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.

  • Michie, S., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., & Eccles, M. (2008). From theory to implementation: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 660–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Johnston, M., West, R., Abraham, C., Hardeman, W., & Wood, C. (2014). Designing behavior change interventions: The behaviour change wheel and behavior change techniques. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 47, S157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., … Wood, C. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.

  • Michie, S., van Stralen, M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.

  • Murphy, M., Byrne, M., Zarabzadeh, A., Corrigan, D., Fahey, T., & Smith, S. (2017). Development of a complex intervention to promote appropriate prescribing and medication intensification in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in Irish general practice. Implementation Science, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0647-z.

  • Nkansah, N., Mostovetsky, O., Yu, C., Chheng, T., Beney, J., Bond, C. M., & Bero, L. (2010). Effect of outpatient pharmacists’ non‐dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (7). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000336.pub2.

  • Presseau, J., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hrisos, S., Stamp, E., Steen, N., … Eccles, M. (2014). Theory-based predictors of multiple clinician behaviors in the management of diabetes. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9513-x.

  • Rainbird, K., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., & Buchan, H. (2006). Identifying barriers to evidence uptake. Melbourne: National Institute of Clinical Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini, V., Garcia-Armesto, S., Klemperer, D., Paris, V., Elshaug, A. G., Brownlee, S., … Fisher, E. S. (2017). Drivers of poor medical care. The Lancet, 390(10090), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30947-3.

  • Santschi, V., Chiolero, A., Burnand, B., Colosimo, A. L., & Paradis, G. (2011). Impact of pharmacist care in the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Internal Medicine, 171(16), 1441–1453. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, L., McCullough, A., Del Mar, C., & Lowe, J. (2017). Using theory to explore facilitators and barriers to delayed prescribing in Australia: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behaviour Change Wheel. BMC Family Practice, 18(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0589-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Pandit, A., & Tabassum, F. (2017). Potential facilitators and barriers to adopting standard treatment guidelines in clinical practice. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 30(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2016-0148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shojania, K., Jennings, A., Mayhew, A., Ramsay, C., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2010). Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(5), E216–E225. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soubhi, H., Bayliss, E. A., Fortin, M., Hudon, C., van den Akker, M., Thivierge, R., … Fleiszer, D. (2010). Learning and caring in communities of practice: Using relationships and collective learning to improve primary care for patients with multimorbidity. Annals of Family Medicine, 8(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1056.

  • Tan, E. C. K., Stewart, K., Elliott, R. A., & George, J. (2014). Pharmacist services provided in general practice clinics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 10(4), 608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trietsch, J., Steenkiste, B., Hobma, S., Frericks, A., Grol, R., Metsemakers, J., et al. (2014). The challenge of transferring an implementation strategy from academia to the field. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 20(6), 1162–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trietsch, J., van Steenkiste, B., Grol, R., Winkens, B., Ulenkate, H., Metsemakers, J., et al. (2017). Effect of audit and feedback with peer review on general practitioners’ prescribing and test ordering performance: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Family Practice, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0605-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiantou, V., Moschandreas, J., Bertsias, A., Papadakaki, M., Saridaki, A., Agius, D., … Lionis, C. (2015). General practitioners’ intention to prescribe and prescribing patterns in selected European settings: The OTCSOCIOMED project. Health Policy, 119(9), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.06.006.

  • Tsiantou, V., Shea, S., Martinez, L., Agius, D., Basak, O., Faresjö, T., … Lionis, C. (2013). Eliciting general practitioners’ salient beliefs towards prescribing: A qualitative study based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour in Greece. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 38(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12037.

  • Wieringa, S., Engebretsen, E., Heggen, K., & Greenhalgh, T. (2018). How knowledge is constructed and exchanged in virtual communities of physicians: Qualitative study of mindlines online. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8325.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, S., & Greenhalgh, T. (2015). 10 years of mindlines: A systematic review and commentary. Implementation Science, 10(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0229-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwolsman, S. E., van Dijk, N., & de Waard, M. W. (2013). Observations of evidence-based medicine in general practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2(4), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-013-0078-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn Maria Weekes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weekes, L.M. (2020). Theoretical Bases of Interventions to Improve Use of Medicines and Tests. In: Weekes, L. (eds) Improving Use of Medicines and Medical Tests in Primary Care. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2333-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2333-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2332-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2333-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics