Skip to main content

Critical Psychology as Cultural-Historical Psychology: Political Dimensions and Limitations of Psychological Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural-Historical and Critical Psychology

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research ((PCHR,volume 8))

  • 725 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the connection between the theory and practice of critical psychology, focusing upon the critique of essentialism, individualism and universalism of mainstream social psychology and laying the basis for an approach to politics and justice working in and against the discipline. I argue in this chapter that contemporary ‘critical psychology’ is always already necessarily social and that as a form of critical cultural-historical psychology, it is always already necessarily political. This political nature of cultural-historical psychology needs to be clarified, however, and to be contrasted with the ways in which ‘politics’ is sometimes understood in ‘community psychology’. In this chapter I address questions of ‘alienation’, the ways critical psychology configures itself as a response to mainstream psychology as an ideological warrant for capitalism. I describe emerging areas of research in critical psychology, taking the particular example of critical psychology in Britain to illustrate the opportunities and dangers to our concern with social justice as intimately linked with anti-capitalist struggle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister, P., Bunn, G., Burman, E., Daniels, J., Duckett, P., Goodley, D. et al. (2011). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide (Rev. 2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basaglia, F. (1987). Psychiatry inside out: Selected writings of Franco Basaglia. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1976). Social psychology and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassier, R. (2003). Axiomatic heresy: The non-philosophy of Francois Laruelle. Radical Philosophy, 121, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, P. (2009). The alienated heart: Hochschild’s “emotional labour” thesis and the anticapitalist politics of alienation. Capital & Class, 33(7), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychological theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (Ed.). (1990). Feminists and psychological practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E., Aitken, G., Alldred, P., Allwood, R., Billington, T., Goldberg, B., et al. (1996). Psychology discourse practice: From regulation to resistance. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E., Alldred, P., Bewley, C., Goldberg, B., Heenan, C., Marks, D., et al. (1996). Challenging women: Psychology’s exclusions, feminist possibilities. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G. (1958). What is psychology? In I. Parker (Ed.). (2011) Critical psychology: Critical concepts in psychology, volume 1, dominant models of psychology and their limits (pp. 416–428). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, M., Marvakis, A., Mentinis, M., Painter, D. and Triliva, S. (Eds.). (2013). Critical psychology in a changing world: Building bridges and expanding the dialogue, special issue. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, M., Marvakis, A., & Triliva, S. (Eds.). (2006). Critical psychology in a changing world: Contributions from different geo-political regions [Special issue]. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dashtipour, P. (2012). Social identity in question: Construction, subjectivity and critique. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2012). Psychologisation in times of globalisation. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, J. (2013). Psychologization and the subject of late modernity. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fozooni, B. (2011). What is critical Social Research? Volume 1. Peterborough, UK: Fastprint Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordo López, Á. J. (2000). On the psychologization of critical psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordo López, Á. J., & Cleminson, R. (2004). Techno-sexual landscapes: Changing relations between technology and sexuality. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordo López, Á. J., & Parker, I. (Eds.). (1999). Cyberpsychology. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2015). From critical disability studies to critical global disability studies. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaken, J., & Reavey, P. (Eds.). (2009). Memory matters: Contexts for understanding sexual abuse recollections. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (1994). The professional construction of “paranoia” and the discursive uses of diagnostic criteria. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 67, 131–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialisation of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (2008). Doing intellectual disagreement differently? Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 13, 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingleby, D. (1985). ‘Professionals as socializers: The “psy complex”’. In I. Parker (Ed.) (2011) Critical psychology: Critical concepts in psychology, volume 1, dominant models of psychology and their limits (pp. 279–307). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, C., Burton, M., Duckett, P., Lawthom, R., & Siddiquee, A. (2011). Critical community psychology: Critical action and social change. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10(2), 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovel, J. (2007). The enemy of nature: The end of capitalism or the end of the world? (2nd Rev. ed.). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. (1974). Late capitalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E., & Novack, G. (1970). The Marxist theory of alienation. New York: Pathfinder Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoul, A., & Rapley, M. (2005). A case of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis: Sir Karl and Francis B. slug it out on the consulting room floor. Discourse & Society, 16(3), 419–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K. (2011). Surviving identity: Vulnerability and the psychology of recognition. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. (1996). Hearing voices: An emancipatory discourse analytic approach. Changes: An International Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14, 238–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky, revolutionary scientist. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (Ed.). (1999). Deconstructing psychotherapy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2007). Revolution in psychology: Alienation to emancipation. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2009). Critical psychology and revolutionary Marxism. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (Ed.). (2011a). Critical psychology (four-volumes). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2011b). Lacanian psychoanalysis: Revolutions in subjectivity. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2012). Discursive social psychology now. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 471–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of critical psychology. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I., & Spears, R. (Eds.). (1996). Psychology and society: Radical theory and practice. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I., & Nelson, G. (2002). Doing psychology critically: Making a difference in diverse settings. Houndmills, UK/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. (1982). The determination of collective behaviour. In I. Parker (Ed.). (2011) Critical psychology: Critical concepts in psychology, volume 4, alternatives and visions for change. London/New York: Routledge. and, In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and lntergroup relations (pp. 41–83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn-Rethel, A. (1978). Intellectual and manual labour: A critique of epistemology. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spandler, H. (2006). Asylum to action: Paddington day hospital, therapeutic communities and beyond. London/Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (1975). Toward a psychological theory of alienation. Psychological Review, 82(1), 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Went, R. (2000). Globalization: Neoliberal challenge, radical responses. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, K. (2001). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality. New York: Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (Eds.). (1995). Feminism and discourse. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. M. (1994). Mental space. London: Process Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parker, I. (2020). Critical Psychology as Cultural-Historical Psychology: Political Dimensions and Limitations of Psychological Knowledge. In: Fleer, M., González Rey, F., Jones, P. (eds) Cultural-Historical and Critical Psychology. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2209-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics