Abstract
This chapter aims to reveal some theoretical questions and concepts developed by Vygotsky that were not included in the dominant representation of his work, neither in Soviet psychology nor in Western psychology, in an attempt to find different possible paths taken by his legacy after his death and their relation to different moments in Vygotsky’s work. An attempt is made to interpret Vygotsky within the legacy of Soviet psychology, bringing to light relations and processes widely overlooked within Western psychology. The chapter discusses in depth Vygotsky’s instrumental-behavioral period between 1927 and 1931, which after his death was identified with his cultural-historical moment. Two different legacies of his work are discussed related to two different Vygotskyian pathways with completely different outcomes in both Soviet and Western psychology. The focus of this chapter therefore aligns with the main goal of this book, namely, the critical and noncritical implications of these two different pathways of Vygotsky’s work for both psychology and social critique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This information was taken from Vygotsky’s record entitled “Symposium,” December 4, 1932 (Taken from Zavershneva, 2010).
- 2.
In our definition of subjectivity, symbolical processes and emotions are inseparable, forming a new unit, subjective senses, whose emergence signals a new qualitative unit in which emotions become symbolic processes and vice versa, having its own mode of functioning that is beyond any conscious control or intentions.
References
Abuljanova, K. A. (1973). O subjekte psykjichesko ideyatelnosti (On the subject of psychical activity). Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
Ananiev, B. G. (1977). O problemax Sovremennogo Shelobekosnaniya [On the problem of the contemporary knowledge of human being]. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
Cornejo, C. (2015). Searching for the microcosm: A glimpse into the roots of Vygotsky’s holism. History of Human Sciences, 28(2), 72–92.
Davydov, V. V., Elkonin, D. B., & Markova, A. K. (1978). Osnovnye voprocy sovremennoi psykjologii detei mladchevo schkolnovo vozrasta. In: Problemy ovchei, vozrastnoy and pedagogishesckoi psikjologii. [Main questions current psychology of children early scholar age. In: Problems of general, aging and pedagogical psychology] (pp. 180–205). Moscow, Russia: Pedagogika.
Fleer, M., González Rey, F., & Veresov, N. (2017). Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Setting the stage. In M. Fleer, F. González Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, emotions and subjectivity: Advancing Vygotsky’s legacy (pp. 1–18). Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Fleer, M., & Quinones, G. (2013). An assessment of perezhivanie: Building and assessment peda-gogy for, with and of early childhood science learning. In D. Currigim, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 231–247). Dordrecht: Springer.
Frazer, J., & Yasnitsky, A. (2015). Deconstructing Vygotsky’s victimization narrative. A re-examination of the ‘Stalinist suppression’ of Vygotskian theory. History of Human Sciences, 28(2), 128–153.
Garai, L., & Kocski, M. (1995). Another crisis in psychology: A possible motive for the Vygotsky – Boom. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 33(1), 183–198.
González Rey, F. (2009). Historical relevance of Vygotsky’s work: Its significance for a new approach to the problem of subjectivity in psychology. Outlines: Critical Practical Studies, 11, 59–73.
González Rey, F. (2011). A re-examination of defining moments in Vygotsky’s work and their implications for his continuing legacy. Mind, Culture & Activity, 18, 257–275.
González Rey, F. (2016). Advancing the topics of social reality, culture, and subjectivity from a cultural–historical standpoint: Moments, paths, and contradictions. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36(3), 175–189.
González Rey, F. (2017a). Advances in subjectivity from a cultural-historical perspective: Unfoldings and consequences for cultural studies today. In M. Fleer, F. Gonzalez Rey, & N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, Emotions & Subjectivity: Advancing the Vygotsky’s legacy (pp. 173–194). Singapore: Springer.
González Rey, F. (2017b). The topic of subjectivity in psychology: Contradictions, paths and new alternatives. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 47, 502. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12144
González Rey, F. (2018). Subjectivity and discourse: Complementary topics for a critical psychology. Culture & Psychology, 25, 178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18754338
Leontiev, A. A. (1984). The productive career of Aleksei Nikolaevich Leontiev. Soviet Psychology, 13, 6–56.
Leontiev, A. A. (1992). Ecce homo. Methodological problems of the activity theoretical approach. Multidisciplinary Newsletter of Activity Theory, 11(12), 41–44.
Leontiev, A. N. (1994). Filosofiya psykjologii: Iz naushnovo naslediya [The philosophy of psychology: Out of scientific legacy]. Moscow, Russia: University of Moscow.
Lomov, B. F. (1978). Kategorii obtscheniya i deyatelnosti v psykjologii (The categories of communication and activity in psychology). Voprocy Filosofii. [Questions of Philosophy], 8, 34–47.
Lomov, B. F. (1984). Scientific law as the link between pure and applied research: A soviet perspective, Australian Psychologist, November 1984, 19(3), 345–352, https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068408255440
Matiuskin, A. M. (1983). Posleslovie [epilogue]. In: Sobranye sochinenya, vol. 3 [The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky] (pp. 340–347). Moscow, Russia: Pedagogica.
Mikhailov, F. T. (2006). Problems of the method of cultural-historical psychology. Journal of Russian and European Psychology, 44(1), 21–54.
Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rubinstein, S. L. (1946). Osnovy obshei psykjologii [Basis of the general psychology]. Moscow, Russia: MGU.
Seniushenko, S. P. (2006). Tipy interiorizatzi v teorii L. S. Vygotskogo [Types of internalization in L. S. Vygotsky’s theory. Voprocy psikjology [Questions of Psychology], 5, 135–142.
Smirnova, E. (1996). Problema obsheniya rebionka i vzroslovo v ravotax L. S. Vygotskovo i M. I. Lizinoi [The problem of the communication of the child and adult in the works of L. S. Vygotsky and M. I. Lizina]. Voprocy Psykjology [Questions of Psychology], 6, 76–87.
Veresov, N., & Fleer, M. (2016). The journey forward. Mind, Culture & Activity, 23(4), 350–352.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1965). Psykhologiya Iskustva [Psychology of art]. Moscow, Russia: Izdatelstva. Iskustva [Art Publisher].
Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1983). Istoriya razvitiya vishix psykjicheskix funkzii [The history of the development of higher psychological functions], Sobranye sochinenya. T. 3. [The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol 3]. (pp. 6–328). Moscow, Rissia: Pedagogica.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1984a). K voprosy o psykhologii judochestvennovo tvorchestva aktera. [On the question of the psychology of the creative artist]. In: M. Yarochevsky (Ed.), Sobranye sochinenya. T. 6 [The collected works of L. S. Vygotky. Vol 6.] (pp. 324–328). Moscow, Russia: Pedagogica.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1984b). Krisis cemi let [The crisis at age seven]. In A. V. Zaporozhets (Ed.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobraniie Sochinenii T. 4 [The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky Vol. IV] (pp. 376–385). Moscow, Russia: Pedagoguika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1, pp. 43–287). New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. Vaan Der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). The science of psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 50(4), 85–106.
Yasnitsky, A. (2009). Vygotsky circle during the decade of 1931–1941: Toward an integrative science of mind, brain and education. Thesis for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy. University of Toronto.
Yasnitsky, A. (2012). Revisionist revolution in Vygotskian science: Toward cultural-historical gestalt psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 50(4), 3–15.
Yasnitsky, A. (2014). Higher functions & “Height” psychology: Vygotsky (Ab)uses Leon Trotsky and Friedrich Nietzsche. Marília: Brazil. Paper presented on August 12, 2014 in the II International Congress on Cultural – Historical Psychology.
Yasnitsky, A. (2016). Una historia transnacional del inicio de una hermosa amistad: Nacimiento de la psicología Gestalt histórico-cultural de Aleksandr Luria, Kurt Lewin, Liev Vygotski, y otros. [A transnational history of a beautiful friendship: Birth of the Gestalt cultural historical psychology of Alexander Luria, Kurt Lewin, Liev Vygotsky and others]. In: A. Yasnitsky & R. Van der Veer (Eds.), Vygotsky revisitado: una historia crítica de su contexto y legado. [Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies: The state of art] (pp.117–140). Spain: Miño y Dávila Editores.
Yasnitsky, A., & van der Veer, R. (Eds.). (2016). Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Zavershneva, E. (2010). The Vygotsky’s familiar archive: New findings. Notebooks, notes and scientific journals of L. S. Vygotky (1912–1934). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 48(1), 34–65.
Zavershneva, E. (2016). El camino a la Libertad: Vygotski in 1932. [The way to freedom: Vygotsky in 1932]. In: A. Yasnitsky & R. Van der Veer (Eds.), Vygotsky revisitado: una historia crítica de su contexto y legado [Revisionist revolution in Vygotsky studies: The state of art] (pp. 183–200). Spain: Miño y Dávila Editores.
Zinchenko, V. P. (1993). Kulturno-Istorisheskaya Psykjologiya: Onyt amplifikatsii. [Cultural-Historical Psychology: The experience of amplification] Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology]. 4, 5–19.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2002). Problematika mischleniya v razvivayochevo obycheniya [The problematic of thinking in developmental education]. In: Razvivayushee obrazovanie. Dialog c V. V. Davydovym [Developmental education. Dialog with V. V. Davydov T.1] (pp. 46–102). Moscow, Russia: Academia.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2007). Thought and word: The approaches of L. S. Vygotsky and G. Schpet. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 212–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zinchenko, V. P. (2012). K 80-letiyu Jarkovskoi psykjologuisheskoi shkoly. [About the 80 years of the Kharkov psychological school]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology], 6, 133–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
González Rey, F. (2020). The Two Pathways of Vygotsky’s Legacy: The Critical and Noncritical Coexisting Positions in Vygotsky’s Thought. In: Fleer, M., González Rey, F., Jones, P. (eds) Cultural-Historical and Critical Psychology. Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research, vol 8. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2209-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2209-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2208-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2209-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)