Site Characterization for Container Terminal Project at North Coast of Jakarta City by In-Situ Testing

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 62)


New container port terminal is to be constructed in the Jakarta offshores. The seabed in the project location is generally very soft, and the thickness may vary. Undisturbed sampling is difficult, and disturbance cannot be avoided. Consequently, it is required to perform a set of in-situ soil testing. This paper presents site characterization of an offshore-container terminal by in-situ tests. Several types of insitu tests have been performed on the port area, which is drilling with SPT, mechanical CPT, CPTu (piezocone), and Vane Shear Test (VST). All of the test results are compared to investigate the variation of the ground condition, as well as to check the consistency between the tests. In general, the results show that the subsurface condition is soft clays with the thickness varies from 11.0 to 18.5 m, and with the cone resistance (qc) value of 0.2 – 0.4 MPa. Underneath is a dense sand layer with an average SPT N-value of 50 blows/0.3 m. Furthermore, interestingly it is found diluvium clays deposit below the sand layer, with an average of cone resistance (qc) of 2.0 MPa. Besides, interpretation of geotechnical parameters of the soft clay deposit is also presented. The use of Bq* parameter (Rahardjo, 2016) is introduced to interpret the results better, and it is mainly used for the detection of under-consolidation behaviour.


site characterization in-situ testing soft soils coastal engineering 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. GEC, PT. (2011). Soil Investigation Factual Report Project Container Yard Tanjung Priok (in Indonesian). Final Report, Issued March 2011, Bandung.Google Scholar
  2. Rahardjo, P.P., Anggoro, B.W., Yakin, Y.A., Darmawan, H. (2008). Determination of Degree of Consolidation of Reclaimed Site on Deep Soft Mahakam Deltaic Soils Using CPTu. The 4th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Rahardjo, P.P. (2016). CPTu in Consolidating Soils. Proceeding International Conference for Site Characterization. ISC6, Gold Coast, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G., Gillespie, D., and Greig, J. (1986). Use of Piezometer Cone Data. Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference In Situ ‘86: Use of ln Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, 1263-80, American Society of Engineers (ASCE).Google Scholar
  5. Robertson, P.K., Sully, J.P., Woeller, D.J., Lunne, T., Powell, J.J.M. and Gillespie, D.G. (1992). Estimating coefficient of consolidation from piezocone tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 29(4):551–557.Google Scholar
  6. Schmertmann, J. H. (1978). Guidelines for cone penetration test performance and design, Report FHWA-TS-78-209. U.S. Dept of Transportation, Washington, 145 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Setionegoro, N. (2013). Research on the Characterization of Consolidating Soils (in Indonesian). PhD Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung Indonesia.Google Scholar
  8. Skempton, A. W. and Northey, R. D. (1952). The sensitivity of clays. Geotechnique, pp 3:30–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PT. Geotechnical Engineering ConsultantBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.Universitas Katolik ParahyanganBandungIndonesia

Personalised recommendations