Skip to main content

Assessing the Impact of Rows of Tidal-Stream Turbines on the Overtides of the M2

  • 689 Accesses

Part of the Springer Water book series (SPWA)

Abstract

Flood-ebb asymmetry of a tidal flow has important implications for net sediment transport and the potential extractable resource. The asymmetry of the tide in U.K. waters may be understood through the interaction of the M2 (principal lunar) and M4 (first even overtide of the M2) tidal constituents. The interaction of the M2 tide with a tidal-stream turbine will alter the M4 tide, both augmenting and reducing the M4 amplitude, leading to an alteration of flood-ebb asymmetry. In this chapter the impact of a row of tidal-stream turbines on the overtides of the M2 has been investigated through a numerical modelling study. Further, the way that additional turbines alter the way the turbines impact the shallow-water tides individually is explored. The results of the modelling show that when deployed in a row, on average, the peak velocity deficit and change to the current magnitude asymmetry (CMA) per turbine was less than were it deployed alone. The difference between the per turbine impact of turbines in a row and that of an individual turbine grew as the number of turbines in the row, and therefore the row blockage, increased. Additionally, the total area of the model domain experiencing a change to the M2 current and CMA > 1% increased with the addition of turbines to the row, for a row blockage >~10%, but remained similar to the single turbine case for lower blockage values. The implication of the change to the CMA by a turbine in a row for the asymmetry in energy conversion for its lateral neighbours was small as the turbines do not lie within the area of effect of their neighbours. However, the per turbine energy conversion increased as the number of turbines and row blockage increased, in line with theory.

Keywords

  • Tidal-Stream turbines
  • Tidal asymmetry
  • Tidal-Stream array
  • Physical environment impact

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When simulating a real-world site, better representation of the harmonic generation within the model domain will be obtained by supplying the harmonic tides at the boundaries of the model (Le Provost and Fornerino 1985). As only an idealised case is considered in this work any choice of harmonics supplied at the boundaries would be somewhat arbitrary. Therefore, the simplest case was considered. The case of undistorted tides at either boundary, i.e. M2 tide with negligible harmonics.

References

  • Ahmadian, R., Falconer, R., & Bockelmann-Evans, B. (2012). Far-field modelling of the hydro-environmental impact of tidal stream turbines. Renewable Energy, 38, 107–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baston, S., Waldman, S., & Side, J. (2014). Modelling energy extraction in tidal flows. In TerraWatt Position Papers (p. 102). MASTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, B., & Haas, K. (2014). Tidal distortion as pertains to hydrokinetic turbine selection and resource assessment. In Proceedings of the 2nd Marine Energy Technology Symposium, METS2014, 15–18 April, 2014, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L., & Lam, W. (2014). Slipstream between marine current turbine and seabed. Energy, 68, 801–810.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Churchfield, M., Li, Y., & Moriarty, P. (2011). A large-eddy simulation study of wake propagation and power production in an array of tidal-current turbines. In Proceedings of EWTEC 2011, Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dominicis, M., O’Hara-Murray, R., & Wolf, J. (2017). Multi-scale ocean response to a large tidal-stream turbine array. Renewable Energy, 114, 1160–1179.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DHI. (2016). MIKE 21 & MIKE 3 flow model FM, hydrodynamic and transport module, scientific documentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, J. (1986). Tidal asymmetry and estuarine morphology. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 20, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, C., & Cummins, P. (2007). The efficiency of a turbine in a tidal channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 588, 243–251.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, S., Piggott, M., Hill, J., Kregting, L., Pritchard, D., & Elsaesser, B. (2014). The modelling of tidal turbine farms using multi-scale, unstructured mesh models. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Environmental Interactions of Marine Renewable Energy Technologies (EMIR 2014). Stornoway, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Provost, C. (1991). Generation of overtides and compound tides (review). In B. Parker (Ed.), Tidal hydrodynamics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Provost, C., & Fornerino, M. (1985). Tidal spectroscopy of the English Channel with a numerical model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15, 1009–1031.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, I., Malki, R., Williams, A., & Croft, T. (2013). The influence of flow acceleration on tidal stream turbine wake dynamics: A numerical study using a coupled BEM-CFD model. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 7905–7918.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, S., O’Brien, N., Olbert, A., & Hartnett, M. (2014). Modelling the far field hydro-environmental impacts of tidal farms—A focus on tidal regime, inter-tidal zones and flushing. Computers & Geoscience, 71, 20–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Litt, E., Couch, S., & Davies, A. (2009). The impact of tidal stream turbines on large scale sediment dynamics. Renewable Energy, 34, 2803–2812.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Jordan, J., & Couch, S. (2012). Impact of tidal energy converter (TEC) arrays on the dynamics of headland sand banks. Renewable Energy, 37, 387–397.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, S., Hashemi, M., & Lewis, M. (2014). The role of asymmetry in characterizing the tidal resource of Orkney. Renewable Energy, 68, 337–350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara-Murray, R., & Gallego, A. (2017). A modelling study of the tidal stream resource of the Pentland Firth, Scotland. Renewable Energy, 102, 326–340.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, B. (1991). The relative importance of the various nonlinear mechanisms in a wide range of tidal interactions (review). In B. Parker (Ed.), Tidal hydrodynamics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowicz, R., Beardsley, B., & Lentz, S. (2002). Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using t_tide. Computers & Geoscience, 28, 929–937.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, D. (2019). Alteration to the shallow-water tides and tidal asymmetry by tidal-stream turbines. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingree, R., & Griffiths, D. (1979). Sand transport pathways around the British Isles resulting from the M2 and M4 tidal interactions. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, P., Neill, S., & Lewis, M. (2014). Impact of tidal-stream arrays in relation to the natural variability of sedimentary processes. Renewable Energy, 72, 311–321.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, P., Neill, S., Lewis, M., & Ward, S. (2015). Characterising the spatial and temporal variability of the tidal-stream energy resource over the northwest European shelf seas. Applied Energy, 147, 510–522.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roc, T., Conley, D., & Greaves, D. (2013). Methodology for tidal turbine representation in ocean circulation model. Renewable Energy, 51, 448–464.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roc, T., Greaves, D., Thyng, K., & Conley, D. (2014). Tidal turbine representation in an ocean circulation model: Towards realistic applications. Ocean Engineering, 78, 95–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M., Woolf, D., Grist, E., Kerr, S., Jackson, A., Harris, R., et al. (2011). Marine renewable energy: The ecological implications of altering the hydrodynamics of the marine environment. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54, 2–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stallard, T., Collings, R., Feng, T., & Whelan, J. (2013). Interactions between tidal turbine wakes: Experimental study of a group of three-bladed rotors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371, 20120159.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tritton, D. (1988). Physical fluid dynamics (2nd ed.). London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennell, R. (2010). Tuning tidal turbines in a channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 663, 253–267.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vennell, R. (2012). Realizing the potential of tidal currents and the efficiency of turbine farms in a channel. Renewable Energy, 47, 95–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vennell, R. (2013). Exceeding the Betz limit with tidal turbines. Renewable Energy, 55, 277–285.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Jeuken, C., & de Vriend, H. (1999). Tidal asymmetry and residual sediment transport in estuaries. Technical Report Z2749, WL Delft Hydraulics, Delft, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council studentship, part of the ENVISON Doctoral Training Program, awarded to the lead author. Thanks also goes to DHI UK for providing a student licence for MIKE, allowing this work to be undertaken.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Potter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Potter, D., Ilić, S., Folkard, A. (2020). Assessing the Impact of Rows of Tidal-Stream Turbines on the Overtides of the M2. In: Nguyen, K., Guillou, S., Gourbesville, P., Thiébot, J. (eds) Estuaries and Coastal Zones in Times of Global Change. Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2081-5_13

Download citation