Skip to main content

Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods for Water Balance Analysis Using SWAT: A Case Study of Kelantan River Basin, Kelantan

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICDSME 2019 (ICDSME 2019)

Abstract

Evapotranspiration is a significant variable of a watershed hydrological and water quality processes for surface and subsurface modelling in a basin scale. Most of the calibration and validation hydrological parameters rely on streamflow discharge. Inaccuracy calculation of the PET could disturb all the simulation processes. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the SWAT capability on the estimation of potential evapotranspiration in Kelantan characterised as forest-dominated topography in upstream catchment. The model calibration applied for the data set from 1985 to 2000 by utilising the SUFI-2 algorithm and validated for the period from 2001 to 2016 with three different PET methods: P-M, P-T, and HG. The model indicated that there was no significant difference in the value of NSE and R2. The calibration simulations give very good result in term of NSE and R2 with HG achieved 0.85, 0.86, P-T achieved 0.84, 0.86 and P-M achieved 0.83 and 0.85 respectively. However, HG tends to give lower simulated flow than P-T and P-M in terms of PBIAS were 2.5%, −5.9% and −1.9% respectively. While during validation, all three PETs indicated simulated higher than the observed with PBIAS were −23.3%, −29.3% and −28.5%. The P-M method tends to estimate lower PET than HG and P-T with yearly simulated was accounted for approximately 66%, 70%, and 71% respectively of annual precipitation. Overall, all the available options PETs methods in SWAT, give good performance model after calibration and validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tan, M.L., et al.: Impacts and uncertainties of climate change on streamflow of the Johor River Basin, Malaysia using a CMIP5 General Circulation Model ensemble. J. Water Clim Chang 5(4), 676–695 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dinpashoh, Y., et al.: Impact of climate change on potential evapotranspiration (case study: west and NW of Iran). Theoret. Appl. Climatol. 136(1), 185–201 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alemayehu, T., Van Griensven, A., Bauwens, W.: Evaluating CFSR and WATCH data as input to SWAT for the estimation of the potential evapotranspiration in a data-scarce Eastern-African catchment. J. Hydrol. Eng. 21(3) (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexandris, S., Stricevic, R., Petkovic, S.: Comparative analysis of reference evapotranspiration from the surface of rainfed grass in central Serbia, calculated by six empirical methods against the Penman-Monteith formula. Eur. Water 21(22), 17–28 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Neitsch, S.L., et al.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wong, C.L., et al.: Development of a gridded daily hydrometeorological data set for Peninsular Malaysia. Hydrol. Process. 25(7), 1009–1020 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnold, J., et al.: Soil & Water Assessment Tool: Input/Output Documentation. Texas Water Resources Institute. 2012, Report TR-439, Forney, Texas, United States

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jha, M., et al.: Effect of watershed subdivision on SWAT flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 40(3), 811–825 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Herman, M.R., et al.: Evaluating the role of evapotranspiration remote sensing data in improving hydrological modeling predictability. J. Hydrol. 556, 39–49 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chunn, D., et al.: Application of an integrated SWAT–MODFLOW model to evaluate potential impacts of climate change and water withdrawals on groundwater-surface water interactions in West-Central Alberta. Water 11(1), 110 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Megersa, T., Nedaw, D., Argaw, M.: Combined effect of land use/cover types and slope gradient in sediment and nutrient losses in Chancho and Sorga sub watersheds, East Wollega Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Environ. Syst. Res. 8(1), 24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yacoub, C., Foguet, A.P.: Slope effects on SWAT modeling in a mountainous basin. J. Hydrol. Eng. 18(12), 1663–1673 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Her, Y., et al.: Threshold effects in HRU definition of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Trans. ASABE 58(2), 367–378 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Betrie, G.D., et al.: Sediment management modelling in the Blue Nile Basin using SWAT model. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15(3), 807–818 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul, M., Negahban-Azar, M.: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction using multiple optimization algorithms and objective functions: San Joaquin Watershed, California. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moriasi, D.N., et al.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J., et al.: Assessment of baseflow estimates considering recession characteristics in SWAT. Water 10(4), 371 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samadi, V.: Assessing the sensitivity of SWAT physical parameters to potential evapotranspiration estimation methods over a coastal plain watershed in the Southeast United States, vol. 48 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tejaswini, V., Sathian, K.K.: Calibration and validation of SWAT model for Kunthipuzha Basin using SUFI-2 algorithm, vol. 7, pp. 2162–2172 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) research and development fund (Seeding Project-TNB Generation) under UNITEN R&D Sdn. Bhd. (URND) U-TG-RD-19-05. The authors also acknowledge the financial support from the Public Service Department of Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Khardzir Husain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Husain, M.K., Hayder, G., Mohd Sidek, L., Ahmed, A.N., Kushiar, K.F. (2020). Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods for Water Balance Analysis Using SWAT: A Case Study of Kelantan River Basin, Kelantan. In: Mohd Sidek, L., Salih, G., Boosroh, M. (eds) ICDSME 2019. ICDSME 2019. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1971-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics