Skip to main content

Definition and Classification of Financial Statement Fraud

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Sustainability in Accounting and Finance, Volume II

Abstract

The literature review represents an organization of existing information published on a certain topic, which is used to provide a summary of existing knowledge and ideas. It is based on the relevant information and theories that apply to the understanding of the nature, occurrence, and control of financial statement fraud. The research has reviewed the needed definitions and concepts in order to establish the relevant context. The following chapter consists of the literature review.

This chapter is a part of the author Iavor Bachev’s unpublished doctoral thesis, “Financial Statement Fraud: Analysis and Prevention” completed in 2017 at VUZF University, Bulgaria, under the supervision of Prof. Stoyan Stoyanov. The referat for the thesis can be found at the following link: https://vuzf.bg/teachers/d-r-yavor-hrabrinov-bashev. Some contents from the thesis has also previously been published in the below publication: Iavor Bachev, 2019. “Combating Financial Statement Fraud – an Analysis and Model for the Republic of Bulgaria,” Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 42–71.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 10 February 2023

    The footnote at the end of the title page has been corrected by the authors. It now reads: This chapter is a part of the author Iavor Bachev’s unpublished doctoral thesis, “Financial Statement Fraud: Analysis and Prevention” completed in 2017 at VUZF University, Bulgaria, under the supervision of Prof. Stoyan Stoyanov. The referat for the thesis can be found at the following link: https://vuzf.bg/teachers/d-r-yavor-hrabrinov-bashev. Some contents from the thesis has also previously been published in the below publication: Iavor Bachev, 2019. “Combating Financial Statement Fraud – an Analysis and Model for the Republic of Bulgaria,” Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 42–71.

References

  • ACFE (2010) Report to the Nations. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2010/. Accessed on 6 May 2020

  • ACFE (2012) Report to the Nations.https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2012/. Accessed on 6 May 2020

  • ACFE (2014) Report to the Nations. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2014/. Accessed on 6 May 2020

  • ACFE (2016) Report to the Nations. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2016/. Accessed on 6 May 2020

  • ACFE (2018) Report to the Nations. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2018/. Accessed on 6 May 2020

  • ACFE (2020) Report to the Nations. https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2020/. Accessed on 6 May 2020

  • Albrecht W, Albrecht C (2003) Fraud examination. South-Western, Mason, OH, s. 65

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander J (1996) Rethinking damages in securities class actions. Stanf Law Rev 48(6):1487–1538

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth R (2005) Who should recover what for securities fraud? University of Maryland School of Law Legal Studies. Research Paper No 2005-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Audit Quality (2010) Deterring and detection financial reporting fraud: a platform for action

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman DF, Irving PG (1997) The influence of source credibility attributions on expectancy theory predictions of organizational choice. Can J Behav Sci 29:122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham L (2005) Finance theory and accounting fraud: fantastic futures versus conservative histories. Buff Law Rev 53:789

    Google Scholar 

  • Davia R (2000) Fraud 101. Techniques and strategies for detection. Wiley, Incorporated, New York. ISBN-13: 9780471373094

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Report (2008) Ten things about financial statement fraud—third edition: a review of the SEC enforcement releases 2000–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinev D (2006) Economic fraud part one APII (Ikonomicheskite Izmami. Chast Purva)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinev M (2015) Control and regulation in social management. Publishing House UNWE (Kontrol I regulirane v sozialnoto upravlenie)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooley D (2002) Financial fraud: accounting theory and practice. Fordham J Corp Financ Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott WB (2006) Are investors influenced by pro forma emphasis and reconciliations in earnings announcements? Account Rev 81(1):113–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott R, Willingham J (1980) Management fraud: detection and deterrence. Petrocelli Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson M, Hanlon M, Maydew E (2004) How much will firms pay for earnings that do not exist? Evidence of taxes paid on allegedly fraudulent earnings. Account Rev 79:387–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Accounting Standards board (1980). http://www.fasb.org/home

  • Graham J, Harvey C, Rajgopal S (2004) The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. NBER Working Paper No 10550

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravitt J, Johnston J (2006) United States: Recognizing financial statement fraud red flags. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/white-collar-crime-anti-corruption-fraud/56058/recognizing-financial-statement-fraud-red-flags. Accessed on 5 May 2020

  • Griffiths I (1986) Creative accounting: how to make your profits what you want them to be. Unwin Hyman Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogget J, Edwards L, Medlin J (2008) Accounting. Wiley, New York. ISBN-13: 9780470806586

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt I (2000) Current SEC financial fraud developments: a speech. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch351.htm. Accessed 01 Apr 2016

  • Jans M, Lybaert N, Vanhoof K (2009) A framework for internal fraud risk reduction at IT integrating business processes: the IFRS framework. Intern J Digit Account Res 8(14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedia S, Philippon T (2005) The economics of fraudulent accounting. Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2011) Who is the typical fraudster? https://home.kpmg.com/us/en

  • Kwok B (2005) Accounting irregularities in financial statements: a definitive guide for litigators, auditors and fraud investigators. Gower. ISBN-13:978-0566086212

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam Webster Dictionary (2016) http://www.merriam-webster.com/. Accesed on 5 May 2016

  • Miller S (2003) The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud. Working paper, Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (1987) Report of the national commission on fraudulent financial reporting. http://www.coso.org/FraudReport.htm. Accessed 5 May 2016

  • Oxford Dictionary (2016) Oxford dictionary.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkul FU, Pamukcu A (2012) Fraud detection and forensic accounting. In: Caliyurt K, Idowu S (eds) Emerging fraud: fraud cases and emerging economies. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaru S (2002) Tech-professors expose fuzzy accounting. Contributing writer

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrova D (2007) Use of accounting estimates and fraudulent financial reporting—a paper read at the conference. Theory and Practice of Financial Crimes

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee Z (2002) Financial statement fraud. Prevention and detection. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee Z (2010) The importance of internal audit opinions: as their role expands, many auditors are providing opinions on governance, risk management, and internal control, internal auditor 67(2):47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadka G (2004) Financial reporting and product markets: learning from competitors. Working-paper, University of Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper (1989) Earnings management. Account Horiz

    Google Scholar 

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (1999) Annual Report. https://www.sec.gov/

  • Stoyanov S (2008) Accounting principles. Textbook

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor N (2003) Reporting of crime against small retail businesses. In: Trends and issues in crome and criminal justice no 242. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Warne RC (2009) The effects of fair-market valuations of non-current assets on the judgments of nonprofessional investors. Working Paper. George Mason University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iavor Bachev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bachev, I. (2021). Definition and Classification of Financial Statement Fraud. In: Çalıyurt, K.T. (eds) Ethics and Sustainability in Accounting and Finance, Volume II. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1928-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics