Skip to main content

Writing the Thesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doctoral Writing

Abstract

The independent researcher, with sophisticated writing skills and need for a career, is one outcome of the doctorate. The text itself, the thesis, is another. This chapter swings focus onto that textual artefact, still concerned with the human experience of producing it, but aware that, for most candidates, the doctoral period of their life is dominated by the research and the writing of the thesis. That document itself takes centre stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. (2007). Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-responsible-conduct-research-2007.

  • Belcher, W. (2009). Writing your journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. (2011). Doctorate as genre: Supporting thesis writing across campus. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(6), 725–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S., Kelly, F., & Brailsford, I. (2012). Structuring your research thesis. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundation of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2011). Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres. Retrieved from https://www.press.umich.edu/elt/compsite/ETRW/9780472034567-commentary.pdf.

  • Frank, L., Basch, E., & Selby, J. V. (2014). The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA Network Open, 312(15), 1513–1514. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.11100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glatthorn, A. A. (1998). Writing the winning dissertation: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, P. (2016). Becoming an academic writer: 50 exercises for paced, productive, and powerful writing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2014). ‘They say / I say’: The moves that matter in academic writing. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science imagination. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., & Lovat, T. (2007). Examiner comment on the literature review in PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, S. (1997). Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners’ reports on doctoral theses. Studies in Higher Education, 22(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision (2nd ed.). Oxon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, S. (2005). A conversation on conversation: A research journey with Professor Anne Sigismund Huff. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 11(2), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiley, M. (2009). ‘You don’t want a smart Alec’: Selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 889–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903462316.

  • MacLure, M. (2013). The wonder of data. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507022000011507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, A. K. I. (2009). Another way with words: Language as twentieth-century art practice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, E. (2001). The work of writing: Insights and strategies for academics and professionals. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, M. (2000). Telling the tale of the rise of the novel. Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History, 30(1, Fall), 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (2001). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994, 1996, 2004). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R. (2012). Theorizing in sociology and social science: To the context of discovery. Theory and Society, 41(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-011-9161-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2004). The doctoral examination process: A handbook for students, examiners and supervisors. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafford, V., & Leshem, S. (2002). Starting at the end to undertake doctoral research: Predictable questions as stepping stones. Higher Education Review, 34(4), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trafford, V., Leshem, S., & Bitzer, E. (2014). Conclusion chapters in doctoral theses: Some international findings. Higher Education Review, 46(3), 52–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. (2011). Mapping your thesis: The comprehensive manual of theory and techniques for masters and doctoral research. London, UK: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisker, G. (2005). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations (2nd ed.). London, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., & Muller, J. (2014). On the powers of powerful knowledge. In E. Rata & B. Barrett (Eds.), Knowledge and the future of the curriculum: International studies in social realism (pp. 41–64). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiger, M. (2000). Essentials of writing biomedical research papers (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Carter .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carter, S., Guerin, C., Aitchison, C. (2020). Writing the Thesis. In: Doctoral Writing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1808-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1808-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1807-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1808-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics