Skip to main content

Managing Productivity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doctoral Writing

Abstract

An important aspect of doctoral candidature is learning the habits and discipline of actually writing the document. Most candidates are new to writing documents that are as long as a Ph.D. thesis, and experience a steep learning curve as they discover new processes for approaching their writing. For many doctoral candidates, managing time and energy can be very challenging. Here we explore writing retreats, writing processes, habits and attitudes to writing. This chapter uncovers the ways in which doctoral candidates can be encouraged to carve out time to attend to their writing, both through self-regulation and participation in various kinds of writing groups and writing retreats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, C., & Lee, A. (2006). Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, C., & Mowbray, S. (2013). Doctoral women: Managing emotions, managing doctoral studies. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boice, R. (1987). A program for facilitating scholarly writing. Higher Education Research and Development, 6(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a day: A guide to starting, revising, and finishing your doctoral thesis. New York, NY: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brause, R. (2000). Writing your doctoral dissertation: Invisible rules for success. London, UK: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. (2012). Original knowledge, gender and the word’s mythology: voicing the doctorate. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(4), 406–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, M. C., & Lillis, T. (2013). A scholar’s guide to getting published in English: Critical choices and practical strategies. Toronto, ON: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. (1998). Writing without teachers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty, A. W. (2015). The midnight disease: The drive to write, writer’s block and the creative block. Boston, MA: HoughtonMifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. (1957). The thought fox. In The hawk in the rain. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, H., & Gardiner, M. (2012). The seven habits of highly successful PhD students. Glenelg North, SA: Thinkwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, H., Gardiner, M., & Marshall, K. (2008). Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M., & Kumar, V. (2009). Recursion and noticing in written feedback. European Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamott, A. (1995). Bird by bird: Some instructions for writing and life. New York, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D., Becker, R., & Coate, K. (2005). To prove myself at the highest level: The benefits of doctoral study. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(2), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mewburn, I. (2011). Shut up and write! The Thesis Whisperer blog. Retrieved June 14, from https://thesiswhisperer.com/2011/06/14/shut-up-and-write/.

  • Murray, R. (2002). How to write a thesis. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2011). How to write a thesis (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2013). ‘It’s not a hobby’: Reconceptualizing the place of writing in academic work. Higher Education, 66(1), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. (2014). Doctoral students create new spaces to write. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 94–109). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2009). Writing retreat as structured intervention: margin or mainstream? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1998). Twilight of the idols, or, how to philosophize with the hammer (D. Large, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Original published 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., & Petch, M. (2012). Merleau-Ponty, writing groups and the possibility of space. In L. Clughen & C. Hardy (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines: Building supportive cultures for student writing in UK higher education (pp. 75–97). Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, A. (2010). Slow the presses: Concerns about premature publication. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler, & A. Lee (Eds.), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp. 30–46). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. (2010). How to write a lot: A practical guide to productive academic writing (6th ed.). Washington, DC: APA Life Tools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sword, H. (2016). ‘Write every day!’: A mantra dismantled. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(4), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1210153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sword, H. (2017). Air and light and time and space: How successful academics write. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. (2011). Discipline and learn: Bodies, pedagogy and writing. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1999). The clockwork muse: A practical guide to writing theses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Carter .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Carter, S., Guerin, C., Aitchison, C. (2020). Managing Productivity. In: Doctoral Writing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1808-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1808-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1807-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1808-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics