Advertisement

A 2-D Theoretical Derivation of the Hoek–Brown Criterion

Chapter
  • 269 Downloads

Abstract

A nonlinear strength criterion for rock-like materials is developed in this chapter. Taking α as an angle of micro-failure orientation in rock-like materials, a formulation between α and load is derived from a mixed-mode fracture criterion based on linear elastic fracture mechanics. According to micro-failure experimental phenomena of rock-like materials, a failure characteristic parameter under triaxial compression condition is chosen, which is relevant to confining pressure and is an invariant. A theoretical nonlinear strength criterion is also derived, which is exactly in the same mathematical form as the original Hoek–Brown empirical strength criterion. In addition, it is also found that the coefficient m in the Hoek–Brown criterion has physical meaning which is related to the ratio between the uniaxial compressive strength and the uniaxial tensile strength.

References

  1. Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW (2005) Relation between the Mogi and the Coulomb failure criteria. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(3):431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FLCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreev GE (1995) Brittle failure of rock materials: test results and constitutive models. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Brace WF, Bombolakis EG (1963) A note on brittle crack growth in compression. J Geophys Res 68:3709–3713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brace WF, Paulding BW, Scholz C (1966) Dilatancy in the fracture of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 71:3939–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady BT (1969) A statistical theory of brittle fracture for rock materials. Part I: brittle failure under homogeneous axisymmetric states of stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 6:21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cotterell B, Rice JR (1963) Slightly curved or kinked cracks. Int J Fract 1980, 16(2):155–169. Erdogan F, Sih GC On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 85:519–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diederichs MS (2003) Rock fracture and collapse under low confinement conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36(5):339–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairhurst C, Cook NGW (1966) The phenomenon of rock splitting parallel to the direction of maximum compression in the neighbourhood of a surface. In: Proceedings of the first congress of the international society of rock mechanics, Lisbon, pp 687–692Google Scholar
  10. Gong FQ, Luo S, Lin G, Si XF (2018) Dynamic empirical Mohr–Coulomb criterion of marble under low loading rate. In: Proceeding of International conference on geo-mechanics, geo-energy and geo-resources, IC3G, Chengdu, China, 22–24 Sept 2018, pp. 87–95Google Scholar
  11. Gong FQ, Si XF, Li XB, Wang SY (2019) Experimental investigation of strain rockburst in circular caverns under deep three-dimensional high-stress conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(5):1459–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregg WJ (1985) Microscopic deformation mechanisms associated with mica film formation in cleaved Psammitic rocks. J Struct Geol 7:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A. 221:163–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoek E (1998) Reliability of Hoek–Brown estimates of rock mass properties and their impact on design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(1):63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980a) Underground excavations in rock. Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980b) Empirical strength criterion for rock mass. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE. 106(9):1013–1035Google Scholar
  17. Hoek E, Brown ET (1983) Strength of jointed rock masses. Geotechnique 33:187–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:1165–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoek E, Wood D, Shah S (1992) A modified Hoek–Brown criterion for jointed rock masses. In: Hudson JA (ed) Proceedings of the rock characterization, ISRM symposium Eurock’92. British Geotechnical Society, London, pp 209–214Google Scholar
  20. Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman RW (2007) Fundamentals of rock mechanics, 4th edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Kachanov ML (1982a) A microcrack model of rock inelasticity, Part I: frictional sliding on microcracks. Mech Mater 1:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kachanov ML (1982b) A microcrack model of rock inelasticity, Part II: propagation of microcracks. Mech Mater 1:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemeny JM, Cook NGW (1991) Micromechanics of deformation in rocks. In: Shah SP (ed) Toughening mechanisms in quasi-brittle materials. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 155–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuismer RJ (1975) An energy release rate criterion for mixed mode fracture. Int J Fract 11(2):245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paterson MS, Wong TF (2005) Experimental rock deformation—the brittle field. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Si XF, Gong FQ, Li XB, Wang SY, Luo S (2019) Dynamic Mohr–Coulomb and Hoek–Brown strength criteria of sandstone at high strain rate. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 115:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sih GC (1974) Strain-energy-density factor applied to mixed mode crack problems. Int J Fract 10(3):305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sih GC, Macdonald B (1974) Fracture mechanics applied to engineering problems-strain-energy density fracture criterion. Eng Frac Mech 6(2):361–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tada H (1973) Stress analysis of cracks handbook. Del Research Corporation, Hellertown, PAGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang XS, Wu BS, Wang QY (2005) Online SEM investigation of microcrack characteristics of concretes at various temperatures. Cement Concr Res 35:1385–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wiebols GA, Cook NGW (1968) An energy criterion for the strength of rock in polyaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 5:529–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams E (1957) Some observations of Leonardo, Galileo, Mariotte and others relative to size effect. Ann Sci 13:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanics and Civil EngineeringChina University of Mining & Technology-BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Port, Coastal and Offshore EngineeringZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations