Skip to main content

Postcolonialising Heritage and the Idea of “Malaysia”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Making Heritage in Malaysia

Abstract

With heritage discourse becoming steadily politicised in Malaysia, the term is another means to privilege inclusion—and validate “otherisation”. Recognising its social, economic, political and ideological value, as well as its role in nation-making, this chapter subjects “heritage”—as concept, lived experience and discourse—to careful examination. It argues that although state discourses endorse fixed representations of heritage, the latter is also an outcome of informal cultural practices. By “postcolonialising” heritage and foregrounding the various uses to which heritage has been put, continues to be put and can be put, the chapter points to the complex status of heritage as a cultural and political construct. The key question it raises is—What is at stake and who is empowered when heritage is invoked?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Malaysia is a multiethnic society with a population of about 32.6 million. Malays constitute the majority ethnic community, both numerically and politically. According to government statistics, 62.5% of Malaysians are Bumiputera (“indigenous”), a category which mostly includes Malay Muslims but also indigenous peoples of the peninsula and of Sabah and Sarawak in East Malaysia, 20.5% are Chinese, 6.2% Indian and about 1% Others; 9.8% of the population is made up of non-citizens (Department of Statistics Malaysia 2019).

  2. 2.

    The Bangsa Malaysia (“Malaysian Nation”) policy was introduced by Mahathir Mohamad in 1990, during his first term as prime minister from 1981 to 2003, to create an inclusive national identity for all inhabitants of Malaysia. Mahathir described it as Malaysians “being able to identify themselves with the country, speak Bahasa Malaysia (the Malay language) and accept the Constitution”. His aspiration, at least on a rhetorical level, was for Malaysians to identify as Malaysians first and not by their ethnic, religious or regional identities. 1Malaysia (or One Malaysia) was coined during the premiership of Najib Razak in 2010 as “a concept that encapsulates the very idea of unity in diversity, and […] the importance of national unity regardless of race, background, or religious belief” (1Malaysia website).

  3. 3.

    Malaya attained Independence from British rule in 1957 and was renamed “Malaysia” in 1963 with the amalgamation of the Federation of Malaya, the Borneo states of Sabah and Sarawak, and Singapore.

  4. 4.

    For a fuller discussion, see Ting, Helen. 2013. The Battle Over the Memory of the Nation: Whose National History? In Controversial History Education in Asian Contexts, ed. Mark Baildon, Kah Seng Loh, Ivy Maria Lim, Gül İnanç, and Junaidah Jaffar, 41–57, Routledge: London.

  5. 5.

    Peninsular Malaya and Singapore were loosely united under British colonialism from the late eighteenth to the mid-twentieth century. Singapore separated from Malaysia in 1965.

  6. 6.

    In early August 2019, the government announced that it would introduce khat (Malay-Arabic calligraphy) to the Malay language syllabus for all schools, upsetting non-Malay groups and stirring fears of growing Islamisation. Political analysts also saw the move as a bid by the ruling Pakatan Harapan government to court the Malay vote. The Malaysian education minister subsequently announced that while the government will proceed with introducing khat in Chinese and Tamil primary schools, it will be an optional lesson and one that will not be tested in exams.

References

  • Abu Talib Ahmad. 2014. Museums, History and Culture in Malaysia. Singapore: NUS Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 2006 [1983]. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G.J. 2000. Heritage, Tourism and Places. Tourism Recreation Research 25 (1): 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Marshall. 2013. The Politics of Heritage. Indonesia and the Malay World 41 (121): 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2013.804979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Statistics Malaysia. 2019. Official Portal. Accessed October 20, 2019. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/ctwoByCat&parent_id=115&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy. Translated by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, Frank. 1992. Mythical Past, Elusive Future: History and Society in an Anxious Age. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Sharmani Patricia. 2014. ‘After the Break’: Reconceptualizing Ethnicity, National Identity and ‘Malaysian–Chinese’ Identities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (7): 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2014.859286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Amitav. 1988. The Shadow Lines. London: Black Swan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, Pablo Alonso. 2018. The Heritage Machine: Fetishism and Domination in Maragateria, Spain. London: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stuart. 2000. Whose Heritage?: Un-settling ‘The Heritage’, Re-imagining the Post-Nation. Third Text 49: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, Stevan. 2013. China’s Tangled Web of Heritage. In Cultural Heritage Politics in China, ed. T. Blumenfield and H. Silverman, 285–294. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J.C. 2002. Heritage Attractions and Tourism Development in Asia: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Tourism Research 4: 337–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J., and Terence Ranger. 1992. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggan, Graham. 1997. The Neocolonialism of Postcolonialism: A Cautionary Note. Links & Letters 4: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legêne, Susan, and Henk Schulte Nordholt. 2015. Introduction: Imagining Heritage and Heritage as Imagined History. In Sites, Bodies and Stories: Imagining Indonesian History, ed. Susan Legêne, Bambang Purwanto, and Henk Schulte Nordholt, 1–30. Singapore: NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loo, Yat-Ming. 2012. ‘No Chinatown, Please!’: Contesting Race, Identity and Postcolonial Memory in Kuala Lumpur. The Journal of Architecture 17 (6): 847–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2012.746025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, David. 1997. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maags, Christina, and Marina Svensson, eds. 2018. Chinese Heritage in the Making: Experiences, Negotiations and Contestations. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCannell, Dean. 1973. Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings. American Journal of Sociology 79 (3): 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, Roxanna, and Audrey Gilmore. 2015. Heritage Site Management: From Dark Tourism to Transformative Service Experience? The Service Industries Journal 35 (15): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Aihwa, Virginia R. Dominguez, Jonathan Friedman, Nina Glick Schiller, Verena Stolcke, David Y.H. Wu, and Hu Ying. 1996. Cultural Citizenship as Subject-Making: Immigrants Negotiate Racial and Cultural Boundaries in the United States [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 37 (5): 737–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux, Bruce. 2003. Commodifying Heritage: Loss of Authenticity and Meaning or an Appropriate Response to Difficult Circumstances? International Journal of Tourism Sciences 3 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15980634.2003.11434537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Ian J.M. 2012. Heritage from Below. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Renato. 1994. Cultural Citizenship in San Jose, California. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 17 (2): 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushdie, Salman. 1991. Imaginary Homelands. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. London, UK: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. Nevada, USA: University of Nevada Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Laurajane. 2006. Uses of Heritage. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Heritage, Identity and Power. In Citizens, Civil Society and Heritage-Making in Asia, ed. Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, Hui Yew-Foong, and Philippe Peycam, 15–39. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, Karen M. 2015. Domesticating Hybridity: Straits Chinese Cultural Heritage Projects in Malaysia and Singapore. Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review, E-Journal 17 (December): 58–85. http://cross-currents.berkeley.edu/e-journal/issue-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Eric. 2012. The World Beyond the Nation in Southeast Asian Museums. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 27 (1): 54–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Tim. 2013. Clarifying the Critical in Critical Heritage Studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 532–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharmani Patricia Gabriel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gabriel, S.P. (2020). Postcolonialising Heritage and the Idea of “Malaysia”. In: Gabriel, S. (eds) Making Heritage in Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1494-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics