Analysis of Fuel Consumption Characteristics: Insights from the Indian Human Development Survey Using Machine Learning Techniques

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1090)


There are two main factors that need to be considered when using fuel—ecology and economy. Ecologically, the fuels that are clean (fuel that emits less or no CO2) are more efficient than the ones that are not clean. Economically, such clean fuels are costly compared to their counterparts. The Indian Human Development Survey (IHDS-II) 2011–12 data set provides the usage details on six different types of fuel for over 42000 households in India. This paper shows the details of the requirements and processes taken to classify the data set based on the fuel usage variables. The results are obtained using machine learning techniques on the data set to determine the factors that are responsible for the use of clean fuel over non-clean fuel in households.


IHDS-II Fuel switching Fuel stacking Clean fuel Non-clean fuel ML Random tree 


  1. 1.
    International Energy Agency. 2006. World Energy Outlook.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toole, R. 2015. The Energy Ladder: A Valid Model for Household Fuel Transitions in Sub-Saharan Africa?Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. F. D. Center. Propane Fuel Basics. U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lam, N.L., K.R. Smith, A. Gauthier, and M.N. Bates, Kerosene: A Review of Household Uses and Their Hazards in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coal, The fuel of the future, unfortunately. The Economist, April 16, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ecofriendly Alternatives to Burning Wood in your Fireplace. Scientific American.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pant, K.P. 2010. Health Costs of Dung-Cake fuel use by the poor in rural Nepal. Kathmandu: South Asia Network of Economic Research Institues.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crop Residue, Wikipedia. [Online]. Available:
  9. 9.
    Mekkonen, A., and G. Kohlin. 2009. Determinants of Household Fuel Choice in Major Cities in Ethiopia. Working Papers in Economics.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ado, A., I.R. Darazo. 2016. M. A. 7 (3).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heltberg, R. 2003. Household Fuel and Energy use in Developing Countrie—A Multicountry Study. The World Bank: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thadeo, S.M. 2014. Economic of Urban households’ Cooking Fuel Consumption in Arusha City, Tanzania. Morogoro, Tanzania: Sokoine University of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nasir, Z.A., F. Murtaza, and I. Colbeck. 2015. Role of Poverty in Fuel Choice and Exposure to Indoor Air Pollution in Pakistan. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 107–117.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rehman, I.H., A. Kar, R. Raven, D. Singh, J. Tiwari, R. Jha, P.K. Sinha, and A. Mirza. 2010. Rural Energy Transistion in Developing Countries: A Case of the Uttam Urja Initiative in India. Environmental Science & Policy 13 (4): 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dominic, V., D. Gupta, S. Khare, and A. Agrawal. 2015. Inverstigation of Chronic Disease Correlation Using Data Mining Techniques. In 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences, Chandigarh.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Narendranath, S., S. Khare, D. Gupta, and A. Jyotishi. 2018. Charateristics of ‘Escaping’ and ‘Falling into’ Poverty in India: An Analysis of IHDS Panel Data Using Machine Learning Approach. In 7th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Sept 2018. IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Indian Human Development Survey. [Online]. Available:
  18. 18.
    Longadge, R., S.S. Dongre, and L. Malik. 2013. Class Imbalance Problem in Data Mining: Review. Internation Journal of Computer Science and Network.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brownlee, J. 2018. Need Help with Statistics? Take the FREE Mini-Course. Machine Learning Mastery. [Online]. Available:
  20. 20.
    Chawla, N.V., K.W. Bowyer, L.O. Hall, and P.W. Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall, M.A. 1999. Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. New Zealand: University of Wakaito.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Random Forest. [Online]. Available:
  23. 23.
    Joshi, R. 2016. Accuracy, Precision, Recall & F1 Score: Interpretation of Performance Measures. Exsilio Solutions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science & EngineeringAmrita School of EngineeringBengaluru, Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamIndia
  2. 2.Department of ManagementAmrita School of BusinessBengaluru, Amrita Vishwa VidyapeethamIndia

Personalised recommendations