Skip to main content

Weed Management in Cotton

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cotton Production and Uses

Abstract

The weeds are becoming a major challenge for cotton production across the world, and the crop is infested by broad leaves, grasses, and sedges. Although the presence of weeds is deleterious for potential yield, the extent of losses depends on weed type, density, duration, and crop growth stage. Some weeds like Datura stramonium L., Amaranthus palmeri L., Amaranthus retroflexus L., and Ambrosia trifida L. cause significant yield losses at very low densities in comparison with Cucumis melo L. and Eleusine indica L. The cotton crop is very sensitive at early growth stages where weed presence during the first 2 months of growth may reduce yield from 10% to 90%. The most common effects of weeds on cotton quality are higher trash contents and lint staining problem. The various weed control options have been used for weed management in cotton; however, the efficacy of weed control methods remains low, probably by practicing weed control out of the critical period of weed-crop competition and selection of inappropriate method. The cost of weed control ranges from 54.5 to 320.6 US$ ha−1 in various cotton-growing countries of the world. The use of herbicides for weed control is common in the world; however, excessive and non-judicious use of herbicides led to the evolution of resistant weed biotypes. It provided the basis for development of glyphosate-tolerant cotton genotypes. The big change has been made for weed management with the advent of genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant cotton. It offers flexibility in herbicide use and time of application and improves weed control efficiency and economic returns. The evolution of herbicide resistance has been reported in Amaranthus palmeri L., Commelina benghalensis L., Conyza bonariensis L., Conyza canadensis L., and Sorghum halepense L. Some new technologies like Roundup Ready Xtend cotton and Enlist technology are being developed to cope to the challenge of glyphosate resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CPWR:

Critical period for weed removal

CWFP:

Critical weed-free period

DAE:

Days after emergence

GDD:

Growing degree days

IWM:

Integrated weed management

WAE:

Weeks after emergence

References

  • Abbas Q, Ahmad S (2018) Effect of different sowing times and cultivars on cotton fiber quality under stable cotton-wheat cropping system in southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Life Soc Sci 16:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullahi AE (2004) Weed survey in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) fields in the Pandamatenga plains of northeastern Botswana. S Afr J Plant Soil 21:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahanchede A (1996) Agronomic impacts of the dispersal of two morphological types of Commelina benghalensis L. in Benin. In: Proceedings of 10th international symposium on biological control of weeds, Dijon, France, pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Raza I (2014) Optimization of management practices to improve cotton fiber quality under irrigated arid environment. J Food Agri Environ 2(2):609–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Raza I, Ali H, Shahzad AN, Atiq-ur-Rehman, Sarwar N (2014) Response of cotton crop to exogenous application of glycinebetaine under sufficient and scarce water conditions. Braz J Bot 37(4):407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Abbas Q, Abbas G, Fatima Z, Atique-ur-Rehman, Naz S, Younis H, Khan RJ, Nasim W, Habib urRehman M, Ahmad A, Rasul G, Khan MA, Hasanuzzaman M (2017) Quantification of climate warming and crop management impacts on cotton phenology. Plan Theory 6(7):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Iqbal M, Muhammad T, Mehmood A, Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M (2018) Cotton productivity enhanced through transplanting and early sowing. Acta Sci Biol Sci 40:e34610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Afzal MN, Ahmad F, Ahmad S, Akhtar M, Atif R (2011) Effect of sowing dates, plant spacing and nitrogen application on growth and productivity on cotton crop. Int J Sci Eng Res 2(9):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Abid SA, Ahmad S, Sarwar N, Arooj M, Mahmood A, Shahzad AN (2013a) Integrated weed management in cotton cultivated in the alternate-furrow planting system. J Food Agri Environ 11(3&4):1664–1669

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Abid SA, Ahmad S, Sarwar N, Arooj M, Mahmood A, Shahzad AN (2013b) Impact of integrated weed management on flat-sown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Anim Plant Sci 23(4):1185–1192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Hameed RA, Ahmad S, Shahzad AN, Sarwar N (2014a) Efficacy of different techniques of nitrogen application on American cotton under semi-arid conditions. J Food Agri Environ 12(1):157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Hussain GS, Hussain S, Shahzad AN, Ahmad S, Javeed HMR, Sarwar N (2014b) Early sowing reduces cotton leaf curl virus occurrence and improves cotton productivity. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova XLVII(4):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Nadeem M, Ali L, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Jabran K, Habib urRehman M, Ahmad S, Awais M, Rasool A, Fahad S, Saud S, Shah AN, Ihsan Z, Ali S, Bajwa AA, Hakeem KR, Ameen A, Amanullah, Hafeez Ur Rehman, Alghabar F, Jatoi GH, Akram M, Khan A, Islam F, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Rehmani MIA, Hussain S, Razaq M, Fathi A (2017) Optimizing the phosphorus use in cotton by using CSM-CROPGRO-cotton model for semi-arid climate of Vehari-Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(6):5811–5823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Ahmad A, Nadeem M, Urich P, Fahad S, Ahmad S, Wajid A, Tabassum F, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Anwar S, Baloch SK, Wahid A, Wilkerson CJ, Hoogenboom G (2018) Simulated CSM-CROPGRO-cotton yield under projected future climate by SimCLIM for southern Punjab, Pakistan. Agric Syst 167:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ara A, Akram A, Ajmal M, Akhund S, Nayyar BG (2015) Pharmacological, nutritional and allelopathic attributes of noxious weed, Trianthema portulacastrum L. (Horse purslane). Pure Appl Biol 4(3):340–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WA, Wilcut JW, Askew SD (1999) Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference and seed-rain dynamics in cotton. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 52:163

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett KA, Steckel LE (2013) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) competition in cotton. Weed Sci 61(4):543–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bharathi K, Muthukrishnan N (2017) Survey and records of mealy bugs species on cotton and alternate host of key mealy bug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley and its natural enemies. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6(12):1047–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishnoi LK, Panwar RS, Malik RK, Rathi SS (1993) Effect of varieties and weed free maintenance period on weed competition in cotton. In: Integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of an Indian Society of Weed Science, International symposium, Hisar, India, 18–20 November 1993, III, pp 182–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan GA, Crowley RH, McLaughlin RD (1977) Competition of prickly sida with cotton. Weed Sci 25:106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhler DD (2002) Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Sci 50:273–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bukun B (2004) Critical periods for weed control in cotton in Turkey. Weed Res 44:404–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bükün B (2005) Weed flora changes in cotton growing areas during the last decade after irrigation of harran plain in Şanliurfa, Turkey. Pak J Bot 37(3):667–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler JM, Meredith WR (1983) Yields of three cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars as influenced by spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) competition. Weed Sci 31:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler JM, Oliver LR (1979) Spurredanoda: A potential weed in southern crops. US Dep Agric ARM-S-2, 19 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles G, Roberts G (2013) Managing weeds in cotton. WEEDpak, October 2013, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Charudattan R, Walker HL, Boyette CD, Ridings WH, TeBeest DO, Van Dyke CG, Worsham AD (1986) Evaluation of Alternaria cassia as mycoherbicide for sickle pod (Cassia obtusifolia) in regional field tests. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 317, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station. Auburn University, Auburn, AL, pp 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper AS (2006) Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol 20:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva MP, Mariana CP, Fernanda NB, Alves D-A, Luis P (2016) Periods of weed interference on transgenic cotton ‘imacd 6001ll’. Revista Caatinga 29(2):375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douti PY (1997) Cotton crops versus weeds: when is the competition period? Agriculture et Développement (SI), pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke SO, Powles SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64(4):319–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Economou G, Bilalis D, Avgoulas C (2005) Weed flora distribution in Greek cotton fields and its possible influence by herbicides. Phytoparasitica 33(4):406–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Ruiz E, Loureiro Í, Farinós GP, Gómez P, Gutiérrez E, Saínchez FJ, Escorial MC, Ortego F, Chueca MC, Castañera P (2018) Weeds and ground-dwelling predator’s response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study. PLoS One 13(1):e0191408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giri AN, Bhosle RH (1997) Economics of integrated weed management and nitrogen fertilization in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under rainfed conditions. Indian J Agron 42(4):705–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwathmey CO, Steckel LE, Larson JA (2008) Solid and skip-row spacings for irrigated and non-irrigated upland cotton. Agron J 100:672–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall MR, Swanton CJ, Anderson GW (1992) The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 40:441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heap I (2015) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Herbicide resistant by site of action [online]. http://www.weedscience.org/summary/SOASummary.aspx

  • ICAC (2016) Cost of production of raw cotton. International Cotton Advisory Committee, October 2016, Washington DC, USA, pp 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal J, Cheema ZA (2008) Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) management in cotton with combined application of sorgaab and s-metolachlor. Pak J Bot 40(6):2383–2391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav JK, Degaonkar AM, Narkhede MN (1995) Integrated weed management in cotton. Haryana J Agron 11(1):62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasieniuk M, Brule-Babel AL, Morrison IN (1996) The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44:176–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley PE, Thullen RJ (1991) Growth and interaction of barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 39:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan NU, Khan SU (2003) Integrated weed management in upland cotton. Pak J Weed Sci Res 9(3–4):185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MB, Khaliq A, Ahmad S (2004) Performance of mashbean intercropped in cotton planted in different planting patterns. J Res (Sci) 15(2):191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Latif A, Rao AQ, Khan MAU, Shahid N, Bajwa KS, Ashraf MA, Abbas MA, Azam M, Shahid AA, Nasir IA, Husnain T (2015) Herbicide-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) plants: an alternative way of manual weed removal. BMC Res Notes 8:453

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee LJ, Ngim J (2000) A first report of glyphosate-resistant goose grass [Eleusine indica (L) Gaertn] in Malaysia. Pest Manag Sci 56:336–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luqman M, Musa M, Iqbal MS, Arshad M, Rehman HS (2017) Horse persulane management in cotton by allelopathic crop water extracts along with reduced doses of herbicides. SAARC J Agri 15(1):23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Wu H, Jiang W, Ma Y, Ma Y (2015) Interference between redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Growth analysis. PLoS One 10(6):e0130475

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey WB (2012) Innovations in cotton weed management. California Weed SciSoc, 64. East Cabrillo Boulevard Santa Barbara, California, 23–25 Jan 2012, pp 51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger PH, Abernathy JR, Jipson JR (1984) The influence of selected plant residues on cotton and sorghum establishment. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 37:320

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalini K, Murhukrishnan P, Chinnusamzy C, Vennila C (2015) Weeds of cotton – A Review. Agri Review 36(2):140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto HJ, Brondo MA, Gonzales JT (1968) Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. PANS(C) 14:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Norsworthy JK, Smith KL, Scott RC, Gbur EE (2007) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas cotton. Weed Technol 21:825–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norsworthy JK, Schwartz LM, Barber LT (2016) The incidence and ramification of glyphosate resistance in cotton. Outlook Pest Manage 27(1):31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oad FC, Siddiqui MH, Buriro UA, Solangi GS (2007) Weed management practices in cotton. Asian J Plant Sci 6(2):344–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oerke E-C, Dehne H-W (2004) Safeguarding production-losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop Prot 23:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr CC, Abernathy JR, Hudspeth EB (1975) Nothanguinaphyllobia, a parasitic nematode of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium). Proc South Weed Sci Soc 28:111

    Google Scholar 

  • Özaslan C, Akin S, Gürsoy S (2015) Weed control and crop production practices in cotton production in diyarbakir province of Turkey. YYU J Agr Sci 25(1):41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Pala F, Mennan H (2017) Weed control methods in cotton fields – example Diyarbakir. In: International conference on agriculture, forest, food, sciences and technologies 15–17 May 2017, Cappadocia, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Panwar RS, Balyan RS, Malik RS, Kumar S (1998) Studies on weed control in cotton. Haryana J Agron 14(2):260–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Papamichail D, Eleftherohorinos I, Frouct-Williams R, Gravanis E (2002) Critical periods of weed competition in cotton in Greece. Phytoparasitica 30(1):105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powles SB, Lorraine-Colwill DF, Dellow JJ, Preston C (1998) Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid rye grass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Sci 46:604–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wang X, Wajid A, Nasim W, Hussain M, Ahmad B, Ahmad I, Ali Z, Ishaque W, Awais M, Shelia V, Ahmad S, Fahad S, Alam M, Ullah H, Hoogenboom G (2018) Multi-model projections of future climate and climate change impacts uncertainty assessment for cotton production in Pakistan. Agric For Meteorol 253-254:94–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KN, Nandula VK (2012) Herbicide resistant crops: history, development and current technologies. Indian J Agron 57(1):1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rezakhanlou A, Mirshekari B, Zand E, Farahvash F, Baghestani MA (2013) Evaluation of competitiveness of cotton varieties to cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.). J Food Agric Environ 11:308–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffle MS, Waller GR, Murray DS (1987) Plant growth inhibitors extracted and steam distilled from uni-corn plant (Proboscidea louisianica). Proc Okla Acad Sci 71:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland MW, Murray DS, Verhalen LM (1999) Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 47:305–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scott GH, Askew SD, Wilcut JW, Brownie C (2000) Datura stramonium interference and seed rain in Gossypium hirsutum. Weed Sci 48:613–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir A (2014) Ragweed emerging a major host for the cotton mealy bug in Pakistan. Indian J Weed Sci 46(3):291–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva PSL, Silva JCV, Carvalho LP, Silva KMB, Freitas FCL (2009) Weed control via intercropping with gliricidia. I. cotton crop. Planta Daninha 27:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh M, Pathania M (2017) Yield losses due to weeds in different cotton genotypes. Biennial ConfIndSoc Weed Sci “Doubling farmers’ income by 2022: The role of weed science”, MPUA&T, Udaipur, India during 1–3 Mar 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh K, Singh HP, Singh K (2016) Weed management in cotton with pre- and post-emergence herbicides. Indian J Weed Sci 48(3):348–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton RA, Pratley JE, Hudson D, Dill GM (2008) A risk calculator for Glyphosate resistant in Lolium rigidum (Gaud.). Pest Manag Sci 64:402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Yasmeen A, Ahmad S, Hussain N, Afzal MN, Hasanuzzaman M (2017) Shedding of fruiting structures in cotton: factors, compensation and prevention. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 20(2):251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Afzal MN, Muhammad D, Ahmad S, Shahzad AN, Kiran A, Wakeel A (2018a) Relationship of tissue potassium content with yield and fiber quality components of Bt cotton as influenced by potassium application methods. Field Crops Res 229:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Afzal MN, Ahmad M, Qayyum A, Khan MA (2018b) Performance of pre and post-emergence herbicides for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pak J Weed Sci Res 24(2):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauseef M, Ihsan F, Nazir W, Farooq J (2012) Weed flora and importance value index (ivi) of the weeds in cotton crop fields in the region of Khanewal, Pakistan. Pak J Weed Sci Res 18(3):319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingle CH, Steele GL, Chandler JM (2003) Competition and control of smellmelon (Cucumismelo var. dudaimNaud.) in cotton. Weed Sci 51:586–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Ahmad A, Ahmad S, Irshad M, Khaliq T, Wajid A, Hussain K, Nasim W, Chattha TM, Trethowan R, Hoogenboom G (2009) Development and application of crop water stress index for scheduling irrigation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under semiarid environment. J Food Agri Environ 7(3&4):386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeraputhiran R, Srinivasan G (2015) Post-emergence herbicides effect on weeds, yield and economics of Bt cotton. Indian J Weed Sci 47(4):379–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward SM, Webster TM, Steckel LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster TM, Burton MG, Culpepper AS, York AC, Prostko EP (2005) Tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis): a tropical invader threatens agroecosystems of the southern United States. Weed Technol 19:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth J, Thornby D, Walker S (2011) Assessing weeds at risk of evolving glyphosate resistance in Australian sub-tropical glyphosate-resistant cotton systems. Crop Pasture Sci 62:1002–1009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werth J, Boucher L, Thornby D, Walker S, Charles G (2013) Changes in weed species since the introduction of glyphosate-resistant cotton. Crop Pasture Sci 64:791–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood ML, Murray DS, Banks JC, Verhalen LM, Westerman RB, Anderson KB (2002) Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense) density effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) harvest and economic value. Weed Technol 16:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao-yan MA, Han-wen WU, Wei-li J, Ya-jie MA, Yan MA (2015) Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) density effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J Integ Agric 14(9):1778–1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZP (2003) Development of chemical weed control and integrated weed management in China. Weed Biol Manag 3:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XM, Yang NW, Wan FH, Lövei GL (2014) Density and seasonal dynamics of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) mediterranean on common crops and weeds around cotton fields in Northern China. J Integ Agric 13(10):2211–2220

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tariq, M., Abdullah, K., Ahmad, S., Abbas, G., Rahman, M.H., Khan, M.A. (2020). Weed Management in Cotton. In: Ahmad, S., Hasanuzzaman, M. (eds) Cotton Production and Uses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics