Skip to main content

Environmental Accounting, Absolute Limits, and Systemic Change

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

The level of change needed for humanity to operate within the planet’s limits will almost certainly require fundamentally altering the way we interact with the environment. We need urgent, systemic change.

Accounting theory shows that standards and limits are needed to create serious change. Measuring the changing state of the environment (environmental assets) and human pressures on the environment (environmental flows) is known as environmental accounting. Environmental accounting is used by many countries, cities, regions, and businesses as a tool to help them understand and manage their environmental impacts. However, there is a major limitation in most environmental accounts—the lack of appropriate limits.

Environmental performance targets are typically set based on incremental targets. These are often set based on feasibility, local policies, or industry best practice. They are arbitrary. Achieving industry best practice standards does not equate to maintaining or improving environmental assets. Incremental targets encourage incremental change.

In contrast, absolute limits that defined the end goal for our environmental assets and flows would help us to understand what is needed. Absolute limits can be used to create a vision of the future that is not constrained by the status quo.

The Planetary Boundaries are absolute environmental limits. What is missing is a mechanism to connect these limits to existing environmental accounting practices. A connection is suggested as part of Planetary Accounting. This connection could be used to create a design brief for the future—a platform for disruptive innovation and transformational change.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have asked for a faster horse

Henry Ford

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1443-2_5
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-981-15-1443-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 5.1

Notes

  1. 1.

    Elon Musk has made the patents from the Tesla vehicle available to anyone. Musk, E. 2014. All Our Patent Are Belong To You [Online]. Tesla. Available: https://www.tesla.com/en_NZ/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you [Accessed 22 April 2018]. Electric vehicle companies who have been slow to transition may thus still be able to keep up with the transition to electrical vehicles. This is an unusual occurrence, but a good example of how an individual can act as a change agent to achieve global change (see Chap. 5).

References

  • Akenji L, Bengtsson M, Bleischwitz R, Tukker A, Schandl H (2016) Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions. J Clean Prod 132:1

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson R, Kushnir D, Molander S, Sandén BA (2016) Energy and resource use assessment of graphene as a substitute for indium tin oxide in transparent electrodes. J Clean Prod 132:289–297

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur A, Tanner T (2014) Transformational resilience thinking: putting people, power and politics at the heart of urban climate resilience. Environ Urbaniz 26:200–214

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann A (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions associated. Sustainable Development Masters, Uppsala University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellis M (2017) A history of electric vehicles. Available: https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-electric-vehicles-1991603. Accessed 22 Apr 2018

  • BIS (2012) Low carbon environmental goods and services. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A, Modak P (1999) Conducting environmental impact assessment for developing countries. United Nations University, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z (2012) A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod 34:9–20

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Boo AJ, Bosch PR, Gorter CN, Keuning SJ (1993) An environmental module and the complete system of national accounts. In: Franz A, Stahmer C (eds) Approaches to environmental accounting. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing B, Moore D, Goldfinger S, Ourslet A, Reed A, Wackernagel M (2010a) Ecological footprint atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing B, Reed A, Galli A, Kitzes J, Wackernagel M (2010b) Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang K (2015a) Footprint family: concept, classification, theoretical framework and integrated pattern. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica 35:1647–1659

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang K (2015b) Footprint family: current practices, challenges and future prospects. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica 35:7974–7986

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang K, Heijungs R, De Snoo GR (2014) Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Indic 36:508

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fong WK, Sotos M, Doust M, Schultz S, Marques A, Deng-Beck C (2014) Global protocol for community-scale greenhouse gas emission inventories - an accounting and reporting standard for cities. Greenhouse gas protocol. World Resources Institute, C40 Cities, and Local Governments for Sustainability, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Kitzes J, Wermer P, Wackernagel M, Niccolucci V, Tiezzi E (2007) An exploration of the mathematics behind the Ecological Footprint. Int J Ecodyn 2:250–257

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic 16:100–112

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Wackernagel M, Iha K, Lazarus E (2014) Ecological footprint: implications for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 173:121–132

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point. Little Brown, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2011) National footprint accounts. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2014) Footprint calculator. Available: http://footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/calculators/. Accessed 9 Jun 2014

  • Gray A (2017) Countries are announcing plans to phase out petrol and diesel cars. Is yours on the list?. World Economic Forum. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/09/countries-are-announcing-plans-to-phase-out-petrol-and-diesel-cars-is-yours-on-the-list/. Accessed 22 Apr 2018

  • Greenhalgh S, Broekhoff D, Daviet F, Ranganathan J, Acharya M, Corbier L, Oren K, Sundin H (2005) The GHG protocol for project accounting. Greenhouse gas protocol. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée J (2012) Life cycle assessment: past, present and future. International Symposium on Life Cycle Assessment and Construction, Nantes, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective. J Indus Ecol 9:85–98

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1997) ISO 14040:1997 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbar PP, Birkved M, Nygaard SE, Hauschild M (2017) Weighting and aggregation in life cycle assessment: do present aggregated single scores provide correct decision support? J Indus Ecol 21:1591–1600

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchain RE Jr, Gregory JR, Olivetti EA (2017) Environmental life-cycle assessment. Nat Mater 16:693–697

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima S, Aoki-Suzuki C (2015) Efficiency and fairness of resource use: from a planetary boundary perspective. In: The economics of green growth: new indicators for sustainable societies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent A, Owsianiak M (2017) Potentials and limitations of footprints for gauging environmental sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 25:20–27

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D (2004) Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 21:231–246

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Musk E (2014) All our patent are belong to you. Tesla. Available: https://www.tesla.com/en_NZ/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you. Accessed 22 Apr 2018

  • Newman P (2005) Can the magic of sustainability revive environmental professionalism? Greener Manag Int 49:11–23

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P (2017) The rise and rise of renewable cities. Renew Energ Environ Sustain 2:10

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (2006) Urban design to reduce automobile dependance. Opolis 2:35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Kenworthy J (2015) The end of automobile dependence: how cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Island Press, Washington, DC

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2017) Resilient cities: overcoming fossil fuel dependence. Island Press, Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • OVERLAET (2011) Tesla_Roadster_2.5_(fron_quarter).jpg. Wikimedia

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary (2018) Systemic. Oxforddictionaries.com. Available: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/systemic. Accessed 22 Apr 2018

  • Pelling M, O’Brien K, Matyas D (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Clim Change 133:113–127

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urbaniz 4:121–130

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saebo HV (1994) Natural resource accounting - the Norwegian approach. UNEP/ECE/UNSTAT Workshop on Environmental and Natural Resource Accounting, Modra-Harmonia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanström M (2015) Using the planetary boundaries framework for setting impact-reduction targets in LCA contexts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1684–1700

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts GH, Gandz J (2018) Transformational change and leader character. Bus Horiz 61:239

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • SFOSKETT (2005) 1915_Detroit_Electric.jpg. Wikimedia

    Google Scholar 

  • Termeer K, Dewulf A, Biesbroek R (2017) Transformational change. J Environ Plan Manag 60:558–576

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1993) Handbook of national accounting: integrated environmental and economic accounting. United Nations, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2014) System of environmental-economic accounting 2012 - central framework. United Nations, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Statistics Division (2018) SEEA revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Divisions. Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/

  • Valada T (2010) Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental (un)sustainability? A review and further analysis. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T (2009) A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 69:211–222

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meyer, K., Newman, P. (2020). Environmental Accounting, Absolute Limits, and Systemic Change. In: Planetary Accounting. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1443-2_5

Download citation