Skip to main content

Empirical Expression for the Fundamental Natural Period of Buildings on Slopes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 687 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 61))

Abstract

Seismic codes worldwide provide empirical formulas for estimating the fundamental natural period of vibrations (Ta), preferably suitable for regular buildings. As per IS 1893:2016, the fundamental natural period is an inherent building property which is a function of height and base dimensions of the building. However, the formula specified in the existing code is not suitable for a building that is irregular both in plan and elevation. One such case of irregular buildings is building structures on slopes, which are supported on foundations at different horizontal levels leading to non-uniform column heights, where the present period formula is not suitable for estimation of Ta. In the present study, an attempt is made to develop an empirical expression for estimating Ta for buildings on slopes, by performing a regression analysis of numerically obtained natural periods. A total of 180 RC moment-resisting frame structures with varying floor heights and slope angles have been modelled and analyzed using SAP 2000 for the study and an empirical expression has been presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IS 1893-2016 (Part 1), Indian standard Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goel, K. R., & Chopra, K. A. (1997). Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 123, 1454–1461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pradeep Kumar, R., & Murthy, C. V. R. (2014). Point of view: Earthquake safety of houses in India: Understanding the bottlenecks in implementation. The Indian Concrete Journal, 88(9), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sreerama, A. K., & Pradeep Kumar R. (2013, October). Earthquake behaviour of reinforced concrete framed buildings on hill slopes. In International Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia (USMCA 2013), Hanoi, Vietnam.

    Google Scholar 

  5. As 1170.4-2007, Australian Standard, Structural design actions Part 4: Earthquake actions in Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Code. (2005). National Building Code of Canada. Ottawa, ON: National Research Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  7. EN 1998-1 (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The building standard law of Japan, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seismic Design Code of Buildings in Taiwan 2005, Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of Interior, R.O.C.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ASCE standards, Minimum Design Loads of Buildings and other structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, 2010, American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ditommaso, R., Vona, M., Gallipoli, M. R., & Mucciarelli, M. (2013). Evaluation and considerations about fundamental periods of damaged reinforced concrete buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 13, 1903–1912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal, P., & Shrikhande, M. (2006). Earthquake resistant design of structures. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SAP 2000, Computers and Structures, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Housner, G. W., & Brady, A. G. (1963). Natural periods of vibration of buildings. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 89(4), 31–68.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nassani D. E. (2014) A simple model for calculating the fundamental period of vibration in steel structures. APCBEE Procedia, 9, 339–346. ICCEN 2013: December 13–14, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Asteris, P. G., Repapis, C. C., Cavaleri, L., Sarhosis, V., & Athanasopoulou, A. (2015). On the fundamental period of infilled RC frame buildings. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 54(6), 1175–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Kumar Sreerama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sreerama, A., Gundoji, S., Prakke, B., Pasupuleti, V.D.K. (2020). Empirical Expression for the Fundamental Natural Period of Buildings on Slopes. In: Babu, K., Rao, H., Amarnath, Y. (eds) Emerging Trends in Civil Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 61. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1404-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1404-3_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1403-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1404-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics