Skip to main content

An Evolutionary Computing Approach to Solve Object Identification Problem for Fall Detection in Computer Vision-Based Video Surveillance Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances on Memetic Algorithms and its Applications in Image Processing

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 873))

Abstract

This chapter proposes to present the design and development of an evolutionary computation (EC) based system which solves two interesting real-world problems. In the first phase of the system, the object detection problem of image processing is considered. An EC framework is designed to solve it, by formulating it as an optimization problem, considering the minimal required features to detect an object in a given image. The differential evolution (DE) algorithm is used in the framework. The objectives considered are to maximize the accuracy of detection and minimize the number of features required. Belga LOGOS dataset is considered, and 10 different feature descriptors are individually applied for object detection. Later applied the combination of features using the proposed EC framework and compared the results. Individual descriptors gave an average accuracy of 72.35% whereas the proposed method gave an average accuracy of 81.15% which shows the efficiency of the proposed framework. In the second phase, a real-world problem of fall detection of elderly people is considered for surveillance applications. A vision-based solution is proposed instead of using any external devices such as sensors and accelerometers to detect the fall. The advantage of this method is that it doesn’t need the subject to carry any devices and is cost-effective as it is based on only the surveillance videos. To detect the fall, the person needs to detected and tracked during their activities. Initially, people are tracked using core computer vision technique later applied the EC framework developed in Phase I to detect the people and the results are compared. Core computer vision techniques gave an accuracy of 97.16% whereas the proposed optimization framework gave an accuracy of 98.65%. This proved the efficiency of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Büchele, G., Becker, C., Cameron, I.D., Köning, H.-H., Robinovitch, S., Rapp, K.: Epidemiology of falls in residential aged care: analysis of more than 75,000 falls from residents of bavarian nursing homes. Jamda 15(8), 559–563 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hövding. Hövd den nyacyklehjälmen. http://www.hovding.se/ (2015)

  3. Broadley, R.W., Klenk, J., Thies, S.B., Kenney, L.P.J., Granat, M.H.: Methods for the real-world evaluation of fall detection technology: a scoping review. In: Sensors (Basel), vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 2060 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tao, X., Zhou, Y., Zhu, J.: New advances and challenges of fall detection systems: a survey. Appl. Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/app8030418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Birku, Y., Agrawal, H.: Survey on fall detection systems. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 118(18), 2537–2543 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malik, J., Kurukshetra, G., Sainarayanan, G: Harris operator corner detection using sliding window method. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 22(1) (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J., Bang J., Yang, S.I.: Object detection with sliding window in images including multiple similar objects. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 803–806 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charfi, I., Mitéran, J., Dubois, J., Atriand, M., Tourki, R.: Optimized spatio-temporal descriptors for real-time fall detection: comparison of SVM and Adaboost based classification. J. Electr. Imaging (JEI) 22(4), 17 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma, A., Singh, N.: Object detection in image using particle swarm optimization. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2(6) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J.-S., Liu, H.-C.: Object recognition using genetic algorithms with a hopfield’s neural model. Expert Syst. Appl. 13(3), 191–199 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ul Hassan, M., Sarfraz, M., Osman, A., Alruwaili, M.: Object recognition using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Iss. 10(5) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sreelakshmi, S., Vijai, A., Senthil Kumar, T.: Detection and segmentation of cluttered objects from texture cluttered scene. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing Systems, vol. 398. Springer, Berlin, pp. 249–257 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parameswaran, L.: A hybrid method for object identification and event detection in video. In: National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics (NCVPRIPG). IEEE Explore, Jodhpur, India, pp. 1–4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Houacine, A., Zerrouki, N.: Combined curvelets and hidden Markov models for human fall detection. In: Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1–20 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vinaya Sree, K., Jeyakumar, G: A computer vision based fall detection technique for home surveillance. In: Proceedings ISMC (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution—a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report 95–012, ICSI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Storn, R., Price, K.: Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 11, 341–359 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Price, V.: An introduction to differential evolution. In: New Ideas in Optimization, pp. 79–108 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Akhila, M.S., Vidhya, C.R., Jeyakumar, G.: Population diversity measurement methods to analyze the behavior of differential evolution algorithm. Int. J. Control Theor. Appl. 8(5), 1709–1717 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thangavelu, S., Jeyakumar, G., Shunmuga Velyautham, C.: Population variance based empirical analysis of the behavior of differential evolution variants. Appl. Math. Sci. 9(66), 3249–3263 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gokul, K., Pooja, R., Gowtham, K., Jeyakumar, G.: A self-switching base vector selection mechanism for differential mutation of differential evolution algorithm. In: Proceedings of ICCSP-2017—International Conference on Communication and Signal Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Devika, K., Jeyakumar, G: Solving multi-objective optimization problems using differential evolution algorithm with different population initialization techniques. In: Proceedings of 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, pp. 1–57 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gokul, K., Pooja, R., Jeyakumar, G.: Empirical evidences to validate the performance of self-switching base vector based mutation of differential evolution algorithm. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, pp. 2213–2218 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jeyakumar, G., ShunmugaVelayutham, C.: Distributed mixed variant differential evolution algorithms for unconstrained global optimization. Memet. Comput. 5(4), 275–293 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jeyakumar, G., Shunmuga Velayutham, C.: Distributed heterogeneous mixing of differential and dynamic differential evolution variants for unconstrained global optimization. Soft Comput. 18(10), 1949–1965 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Haritha, T., Jeyakumar, G.: Image fusion using evolutionary algorithms: a survey. In: Proceedings of ICACCS 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abraham, K.T., Ashwin, M., Sundar, D., Ashoor, T., Jeyakumar, G: An evolutionary computing approach for solving key frame extraction problem in video analytics. In: Proceedings of ICCSP-2017—International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rubini, N., Prashanthi, C.V., Subanidha, S., Sai Vamsi, T.N., Jeyakumar, G: An optimization framework for solving RFID reader placement problem using greedy approach. In: Proceedings of ICACCI-2017—6th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abraham, K.T., Ashwin, M., Sundar, D., Ashoor, T., Jeyakumar, G.: Empirical comparison of different key frame extraction approaches with differential evolution based algorithms. In: Proceedings of ISTA-2017—3rd International Symposium on Intelligent System Technologies and Applications (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jeyakumar, G., Nagarajan, R.: Algorithmic approaches for solving RFID reader positioning problem with simulated and real-time experimental setups. In: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, pp. 1383–1387 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rubini, N., Prashanthi, C., Subanidha, S., Jeyakumar, G.: An optimization framework for solving RFID reader placement problem using differential evolution algorithm. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Communication and Signal Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abraham, K.T., Ashwin, M., Sundar, D., Ashoor, T., Jeyakumar, G.: Empirical comparison of different key frame extraction approaches with differential evolution based algorithms. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Intelligent System Technologies and Applications (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jeyakumar, G., Sreenath, K.: Personalized courseware construction using association rules with differential evolution algorithm. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Advances in Computer Science, Engineering and Technology (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vinaya Sree, K., Jeyakumar, G.: An evolutionary computing approach to solve object identification problem in image processing applications. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Intelligent Computing (ICIC 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Auvinet, E., Rougier, C., Meunier, J., St-Arnaud, A., Rousseau, J.: Multiple cameras fall dataset. Technical report 1350, DIRO—Université de Montréal (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kwolek, B., Kepski, M.: Human fall detection on embedded platform using depth maps and wireless accelerometer. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 117(3), 489–501 (2014). ISSN 0169-2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nasution, A.H., Emmanuel, S.: Intelligent video surveillance for monitoring elderly in home environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP’07), pp. 203–206. Crete, Greece (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rougier, C., Meunier, J., St-Arnaud, A., Rousseau, J.: Fall detection from human shape and motion history using video surveillance. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW’07), pp. 875–880 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Jeyakumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sree, K.V., Jeyakumar, G. (2020). An Evolutionary Computing Approach to Solve Object Identification Problem for Fall Detection in Computer Vision-Based Video Surveillance Applications. In: Hemanth, D., Kumar, B., Manavalan, G. (eds) Recent Advances on Memetic Algorithms and its Applications in Image Processing. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 873. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1362-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1362-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1361-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1362-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics