Skip to main content

Saussure: Langue as an Autonomous System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models of the Human in Twentieth-Century Linguistic Theories
  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

The lecture notes of Saussure’s students published in 1916 with the title Cours de Linguistique Générale (hereafter ‘the Course’) were taken to be the best collection of Saussurean thought until the discovery of his own lecture notes and manuscripts in his father’s house in 1996. Based on these newly discovered materials, Bouquet and Engler published Ecrits de Linguistique Générale (‘Writings in General Linguistics’) in 2002. In the preface, comparing several quotations from the 1916 book and Saussure’s manuscripts, they make the following remarks:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, other texts of Saussure will also be quoted for the purpose of illustration.

  2. 2.

    Language as a ‘semi-closed’ system highlights the point that language as a system is subject to external influences which work on the system as a whole in triggering a reconstitution of the whole system. This semi-closedness somehow ensures that the system remains autonomous even though from time to time it undergoes changes due to external factors.

  3. 3.

    To be sure, Saussure is aware of the existence of some motivated signs in the province of semiology such as mime, yet he thinks that a system with entirely arbitrary signs represents better the ‘ideal semiological process’ (1916/1983, p. 101), of which language is an example.

  4. 4.

    This statement is challenged by later sociologists who study synchronic linguistic features in order to gain insights into diachronic language change. They point out the possibility of synchronic co-existence of more archaic and newer linguistic forms. This quotation serves as a good illustration: ‘What is missing in his [Saussure’s] conception, however, is the possibility of a moment in time when a more archaic gasti and a more innovating variant, gesti, did coexist in the minds of some very real speakers of the language.’ (Weinreich, Labov, & Herzog, 1968, p. 122)

  5. 5.

    Due to copyright issues, here I use the diagrams published in Saussure (1916). The English translations of the French terms are listed below: Audition (Hearing), Phonation (Vocalization), Concept (Concept), Image acoustique (Sound pattern).

  6. 6.

    Thibault draws on Gibson’s (1979/1986) discussion of ‘ecosocial space’ and position as ‘point of observation’ and makes the point that ‘speaker and listener are not simply physical objects who emit and receive sound waves in an abstract physical space, as in the code model; rather, they are located at positions in an ecosocial space of actual and potential points of observation and points of action’ (Thibault, 1997, p. 153).

  7. 7.

    Joseph (1997) also criticizes Harris’s reading of Saussure as proposing a telementational model of communication. He points out that Saussure does not have a theory of communication and the word communication never occurs in the Course. For him, Saussure is best read as endorsing a view in line with structuralist literary criticism: ‘the real meaning of a text inheres neither within the intention of the author, nor within the minds of readers, but within the texts itself’ (Joseph, 1997, p. 36). By locating meaning within texts, or more exactly, the linguistic sign, this reading renders individual speakers and hearers, their thoughts and intentions secondary. He further explains: ‘the goal of reading is not telementation between reader and author, but as rich a construction as possible of the meaning that is latent within the text’ (ibid.).

References

  • Bouquet, S., & Engler, R. (2006). Preface. In F. D. Saussure, Writings in general linguistics (S. Bouquet & R. Engler, Eds.) (pp. xi-xvi). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culler, J. D. (1976). Saussure. New York: Fontana Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genaust, H. (1976). Compléments à la “Bibliographia Saussureana”, 1916–1972. Histographia Linguistica, 3, 37–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1987). Reading Saussure. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2000). Saussure for all seasons. Review of P.J. Thibault, Re-reading Saussure. Semiotica, 131(3/4), 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2006). Was Saussure an integrationist? In L. D. Saussure (Ed.), Nouveaux regards sur Saussure: mélanges offerts à René Amacker (pp. 209–217). Genève: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, C. (1990). Abstraction and instance: The type-token relation in linguistic theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (1997). The “language myth” myth: Or, Roy Harris’s red herrings. In G. Wolf & N. Love (Eds.), Linguistics inside out: Roy Harris and his critics (pp. 9–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner, E. F. K. (1972). Bibliographia Saussureana 1870–1970. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogger, K. (1941). Kritischer Versuch über de Saussure’s Cours générale. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 61, 159–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogger, K. (1954). Langue-parole und Die Aktualisierung. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 70, 341–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. English version: Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (1931). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. (Original work published 1916)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (1957) Cours de linguistique générale (1908-9). IIe Cours. Introduction. (R. Godel, Ed.), Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure (Vol. 15, pp. 2–103).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (1967). Cours de linguistique générale. Edition critique par R. Engler. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (2002). Ecrits de linguistique générale. (S. Bouquet & R. Engler, Eds.). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. D. (2006). Writings in general linguistics (S. Bouquet & R. Engler, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuchardt, H. (1917). Review of Saussure’s Cours de linguistique générale. Literaturblatt für Germanische und Romanische Philologie, 38, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, N. C. W. (1962). Langue and parole yet again. Neophilologus, 46(1), 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P. J. (1997). Re-reading Saussure: The dynamics of signs in social life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toolan, M. (1996). Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhou, F. (2020). Saussure: Langue as an Autonomous System. In: Models of the Human in Twentieth-Century Linguistic Theories. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1255-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics