Abstract
The lecture notes of Saussure’s students published in 1916 with the title Cours de Linguistique Générale (hereafter ‘the Course’) were taken to be the best collection of Saussurean thought until the discovery of his own lecture notes and manuscripts in his father’s house in 1996. Based on these newly discovered materials, Bouquet and Engler published Ecrits de Linguistique Générale (‘Writings in General Linguistics’) in 2002. In the preface, comparing several quotations from the 1916 book and Saussure’s manuscripts, they make the following remarks:
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
However, other texts of Saussure will also be quoted for the purpose of illustration.
- 2.
Language as a ‘semi-closed’ system highlights the point that language as a system is subject to external influences which work on the system as a whole in triggering a reconstitution of the whole system. This semi-closedness somehow ensures that the system remains autonomous even though from time to time it undergoes changes due to external factors.
- 3.
To be sure, Saussure is aware of the existence of some motivated signs in the province of semiology such as mime, yet he thinks that a system with entirely arbitrary signs represents better the ‘ideal semiological process’ (1916/1983, p. 101), of which language is an example.
- 4.
This statement is challenged by later sociologists who study synchronic linguistic features in order to gain insights into diachronic language change. They point out the possibility of synchronic co-existence of more archaic and newer linguistic forms. This quotation serves as a good illustration: ‘What is missing in his [Saussure’s] conception, however, is the possibility of a moment in time when a more archaic gasti and a more innovating variant, gesti, did coexist in the minds of some very real speakers of the language.’ (Weinreich, Labov, & Herzog, 1968, p. 122)
- 5.
Due to copyright issues, here I use the diagrams published in Saussure (1916). The English translations of the French terms are listed below: Audition (Hearing), Phonation (Vocalization), Concept (Concept), Image acoustique (Sound pattern).
- 6.
Thibault draws on Gibson’s (1979/1986) discussion of ‘ecosocial space’ and position as ‘point of observation’ and makes the point that ‘speaker and listener are not simply physical objects who emit and receive sound waves in an abstract physical space, as in the code model; rather, they are located at positions in an ecosocial space of actual and potential points of observation and points of action’ (Thibault, 1997, p. 153).
- 7.
Joseph (1997) also criticizes Harris’s reading of Saussure as proposing a telementational model of communication. He points out that Saussure does not have a theory of communication and the word communication never occurs in the Course. For him, Saussure is best read as endorsing a view in line with structuralist literary criticism: ‘the real meaning of a text inheres neither within the intention of the author, nor within the minds of readers, but within the texts itself’ (Joseph, 1997, p. 36). By locating meaning within texts, or more exactly, the linguistic sign, this reading renders individual speakers and hearers, their thoughts and intentions secondary. He further explains: ‘the goal of reading is not telementation between reader and author, but as rich a construction as possible of the meaning that is latent within the text’ (ibid.).
References
Bouquet, S., & Engler, R. (2006). Preface. In F. D. Saussure, Writings in general linguistics (S. Bouquet & R. Engler, Eds.) (pp. xi-xvi). New York: Oxford University Press.
Culler, J. D. (1976). Saussure. New York: Fontana Collins.
Genaust, H. (1976). Compléments à la “Bibliographia Saussureana”, 1916–1972. Histographia Linguistica, 3, 37–87.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (Original work published 1979)
Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.
Harris, R. (1987). Reading Saussure. London: Duckworth.
Harris, R. (2000). Saussure for all seasons. Review of P.J. Thibault, Re-reading Saussure. Semiotica, 131(3/4), 273–287.
Harris, R. (2006). Was Saussure an integrationist? In L. D. Saussure (Ed.), Nouveaux regards sur Saussure: mélanges offerts à René Amacker (pp. 209–217). Genève: Droz.
Hutton, C. (1990). Abstraction and instance: The type-token relation in linguistic theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Joseph, J. (1997). The “language myth” myth: Or, Roy Harris’s red herrings. In G. Wolf & N. Love (Eds.), Linguistics inside out: Roy Harris and his critics (pp. 9–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Koerner, E. F. K. (1972). Bibliographia Saussureana 1870–1970. Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.
Rogger, K. (1941). Kritischer Versuch über de Saussure’s Cours générale. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 61, 159–217.
Rogger, K. (1954). Langue-parole und Die Aktualisierung. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 70, 341–375.
Saussure, F. D. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. English version: Saussure, F. (1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth.
Saussure, F. D. (1931). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot. (Original work published 1916)
Saussure, F. D. (1957) Cours de linguistique générale (1908-9). IIe Cours. Introduction. (R. Godel, Ed.), Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure (Vol. 15, pp. 2–103).
Saussure, F. D. (1967). Cours de linguistique générale. Edition critique par R. Engler. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Saussure, F. D. (2002). Ecrits de linguistique générale. (S. Bouquet & R. Engler, Eds.). Paris: Gallimard.
Saussure, F. D. (2006). Writings in general linguistics (S. Bouquet & R. Engler, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Schuchardt, H. (1917). Review of Saussure’s Cours de linguistique générale. Literaturblatt für Germanische und Romanische Philologie, 38, 1–9.
Spence, N. C. W. (1962). Langue and parole yet again. Neophilologus, 46(1), 197–201.
Thibault, P. J. (1997). Re-reading Saussure: The dynamics of signs in social life. London: Routledge.
Toolan, M. (1996). Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhou, F. (2020). Saussure: Langue as an Autonomous System. In: Models of the Human in Twentieth-Century Linguistic Theories. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1255-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1255-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1254-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1255-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)