Abstract
This concluding chapter argues that the Bangladesh case gives an important lesson for the Western political scientists, IR specialists, and even for the Bangladesh experts as it is evident throughout the book that politics in a Muslim-majority country like Bangladesh draws its strength from the non-Western, Islamic concept ummah. This book has demonstrated that, in the Bangladeshi case, ummah supports two separate, yet, to some extent, interconnected political patterns—a state-led Islamization of domestic politics on the one hand and the actions of inter-government and transnational networks of political Islamists on the other. This model of political Islam turns traditional democratization and globalization theories on their head by turning a Muslim-majority state against Western liberal, secular ideas in pursuit of a political order infused with Muslim traditions. The ummah, as a trans-historical and trans-regional ideological group, provides an alternate vision to fulfilling the legitimate goals of international and domestic politics, thereby inspiring state and non-state actors to strengthen religious ideology in state law and the national consciousness. What is problematic however is that Bangladeshi political actors’ use of Islam has largely been authoritarian and devoid of any enlightening philosophy of Islam that supports democracy, human rights, and co-existence though Islam supports democracy, human rights and pluralism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Schwan and Shapiro (2011) explain Foucault’s project of docility, which has two dimensions. Foucault thinks individual bodies are subjects of manipulation that can be ‘shaped, trained [and] which obeys, responds, becomes skillful’ and the object of analysis ‘ which uses calculations and quantifications, mainly gathered from armies, schools and hospitals, to make bodies submissive and controllable’ (Schwan and Shapiro 2011: 98). The project of docility forms when the ‘manipulable body’ and ‘analyzable body’ conjoins together. Foucault (1991) argues that ‘a body is docile that may be subjected, used, transformed and improved’ (Foucault 1991: 136). In other words, ‘docile bodies’ refers to submission and use of human bodies to change behavior. Bodies are spatially enclosed, partitioned and ranked so as to maintain ‘order and discipline’. Therefore, the docile human body serves the ‘machinery of power’ that defines ‘how one may have hold over other bodies so that they may operate as one wishes with the techniques, the speed, and the efficiency that one determines’ (Foucault 1991: 138).
References
Foucault, Michel (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Grujel, John (2002) Democratization, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ibrahim, Anwar (2006) ‘Universal Values and Muslim Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 17(3): 5–12
Kahl, Colin H. (1998) ‘Constructing a Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity, and Democratic Peace’, Security Studies, 8(2–3): 94–144
Masmoudi, R. A. (2003) ‘What is Liberal Islam? The Silenced Majority’, Journal of Democracy, 14(2): 40–44
Oren, Ido (1995) ‘The Subjectivity of the Democratic Peace: Changing US Perceptions of Imperial Germany’, International Security, 20(2): 147–184
Osman, Fathi (2002) ‘Democracy and the Concept of Shura’, in Race, Alan and Shafer, Ingrid (Eds.) Religions in Dialogue from Theocracy to Democracy, Aldershot: Ashgate, 81–97
Owen, John M. (1994) ‘How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace’, International Security, 19(2): 87–125
Pasha, Mustapha Kamal (2002) ‘Predatory Globalization and Democracy in the Islamic World’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 581(1): 121–132
Rane, Halim (2010) Islam and Contemporary Civilization: Evolving Ideas, Transforming Relations, Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press
Safi, Louay (1999) ‘Shura and Democracy: Similarities and Differences’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), Washington, DC (November), http://louaysafi.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_66.html (Accessed on 23/02/2018)
Schwan, Anne, and Shapiro, Stephen (2011) How to Read Foucault’s “Discipline and Punish”: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Pluto Press
Shani, Giorgio (2008) ‘Toward a Post Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth and Critical International Relations Theory’, International Studies Review, 10(4): 722–734
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hasan, M. (2020). Conclusion. In: Islam and Politics in Bangladesh. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1116-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1116-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1115-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1116-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)