Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Islam and Politics in Bangladesh
  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

This concluding chapter argues that the Bangladesh case gives an important lesson for the Western political scientists, IR specialists, and even for the Bangladesh experts as it is evident throughout the book that politics in a Muslim-majority country like Bangladesh draws its strength from the non-Western, Islamic concept ummah. This book has demonstrated that, in the Bangladeshi case, ummah supports two separate, yet, to some extent, interconnected political patterns—a state-led Islamization of domestic politics on the one hand and the actions of inter-government and transnational networks of political Islamists on the other. This model of political Islam turns traditional democratization and globalization theories on their head by turning a Muslim-majority state against Western liberal, secular ideas in pursuit of a political order infused with Muslim traditions. The ummah, as a trans-historical and trans-regional ideological group, provides an alternate vision to fulfilling the legitimate goals of international and domestic politics, thereby inspiring state and non-state actors to strengthen religious ideology in state law and the national consciousness. What is problematic however is that Bangladeshi political actors’ use of Islam has largely been authoritarian and devoid of any enlightening philosophy of Islam that supports democracy, human rights, and co-existence though Islam supports democracy, human rights and pluralism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schwan and Shapiro (2011) explain Foucault’s project of docility, which has two dimensions. Foucault thinks individual bodies are subjects of manipulation that can be ‘shaped, trained [and] which obeys, responds, becomes skillful’ and the object of analysis ‘ which uses calculations and quantifications, mainly gathered from armies, schools and hospitals, to make bodies submissive and controllable’ (Schwan and Shapiro 2011: 98). The project of docility forms when the ‘manipulable body’ and ‘analyzable body’ conjoins together. Foucault (1991) argues that ‘a body is docile that may be subjected, used, transformed and improved’ (Foucault 1991: 136). In other words, ‘docile bodies’ refers to submission and use of human bodies to change behavior. Bodies are spatially enclosed, partitioned and ranked so as to maintain ‘order and discipline’. Therefore, the docile human body serves the ‘machinery of power’ that defines ‘how one may have hold over other bodies so that they may operate as one wishes with the techniques, the speed, and the efficiency that one determines’ (Foucault 1991: 138).

References

  • Foucault, Michel (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Grujel, John (2002) Democratization, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, Anwar (2006) ‘Universal Values and Muslim Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 17(3): 5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, Colin H. (1998) ‘Constructing a Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity, and Democratic Peace’, Security Studies, 8(2–3): 94–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masmoudi, R. A. (2003) ‘What is Liberal Islam? The Silenced Majority’, Journal of Democracy, 14(2): 40–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren, Ido (1995) ‘The Subjectivity of the Democratic Peace: Changing US Perceptions of Imperial Germany’, International Security, 20(2): 147–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, Fathi (2002) ‘Democracy and the Concept of Shura’, in Race, Alan and Shafer, Ingrid (Eds.) Religions in Dialogue from Theocracy to Democracy, Aldershot: Ashgate, 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, John M. (1994) ‘How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace’, International Security, 19(2): 87–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasha, Mustapha Kamal (2002) ‘Predatory Globalization and Democracy in the Islamic World’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 581(1): 121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rane, Halim (2010) Islam and Contemporary Civilization: Evolving Ideas, Transforming Relations, Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Safi, Louay (1999) ‘Shura and Democracy: Similarities and Differences’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Middle East Studies Association (MESA), Washington, DC (November), http://louaysafi.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_66.html (Accessed on 23/02/2018)

  • Schwan, Anne, and Shapiro, Stephen (2011) How to Read Foucault’s “Discipline and Punish”: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Pluto Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shani, Giorgio (2008) ‘Toward a Post Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth and Critical International Relations Theory’, International Studies Review, 10(4): 722–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hasan, M. (2020). Conclusion. In: Islam and Politics in Bangladesh. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1116-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics