Systematic Uncertainties

  • Daiki YamaguchiEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


This section describes the systematic uncertainty in this analysis. The sources of systematic uncertainties are considered: the physics objects and simulation modelling.


  1. 1.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Luminosity determination in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC. arXiv:1608.03953 [hep-ex]
  2. 2.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. arXiv:1606.02625 [hep-ex]
  3. 3.
    Collaboration ATLAS (2015) Performance of the ATLAS muon trigger in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV. Eur Phys J C 75:120. arXiv:1408.3179 [hep-ex]
  4. 4.
    Collaboration ATLAS (2010) The ATLAS simulation infrastructure. Eur Phys J C 70:823. arXiv:1005.4568 [hep-ex]
  5. 5.
    Collaboration ATLAS (2015) Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 75:17. arXiv:1406.0076 [hep-ex]
  6. 6.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2015) Jet calibration and systematic uncertainties for jets reconstructed in the ATLAS detector at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-015.
  7. 7.
    Aad G et al (2013) Performance of jet substructure techniques for large-R jets in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV using the ATLAS detector. JHEP 09:076. arXiv:1306.4945 [hep-ex]
  8. 8.
    Bahr M et al (2008) Herwig++ physics and manual. Eur Phys J C 58:639. arXiv:0803.0883 [hep-ph]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collaboration ATLAS (2016) Measurements of fiducial cross-sections for \(t{\bar{t}}\) production with one or two additional \(b\)-jets in pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV using the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 76:11. arXiv:1508.06868 [hep-ex]
  10. 10.
    Collaboration CMS (2016) Measurement of t\({\bar{{\rm t}}}\) production with additional jet activity, including b quark jets, in the dilepton decay channel using pp collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C 76:379. arXiv:1510.03072 [hep-ex]
  11. 11.
    Schumann S, Krauss F (2008) A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation. JHEP 03:038. arXiv:0709.1027 [hep-ph]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collaboration ATLAS (2015) Search for the standard model higgs boson produced in association with top quarks and decaying into \(b{\bar{b}}\) in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. Eur Phys J C 75:349. arXiv:1503.05066 [hep-ex]
  13. 13.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Search for new phenomena in \(t{\bar{t}}\) final states with additional heavy-flavour jets in 13.2 fb\(^{-1}\) of \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. ATLAS-CONF-2016-104.
  14. 14.
    Kidonakis N (2011) Next-to-next-to-leading-order collinear and soft gluon corrections for t-channel single top quark production. Phys Rev D 83:091503. arXiv:1103.2792 [hep-ph]
  15. 15.
    Kidonakis N (2010) Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W- or H-. Phys Rev D 82:054018. arXiv:1005.4451 [hep-ph]
  16. 16.
    Kidonakis N (2010) NNLL resummation for s-channel single top quark production. Phys Rev D 81:054028. arXiv:1001.5034 [hep-ph]
  17. 17.
    Frixione S et al (2008) Single-top hadroproduction in association with a W boson. JHEP 07:029. arXiv:0805.3067 [hep-ph]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell JM, Ellis RK (1999) An update on vector boson pair production at hadron colliders. Phys Rev D 60:113006. arXiv:hep-ph/9905386
  19. 19.
    Alwall J et al (2008) Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions. Eur Phys J C 53:473. arXiv:0706.2569 [hep-ph]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campbell JM, Ellis RK (2012) \(t{\bar{t}}\)\(W^{+1}\) production and decay at NLO. JHEP 1207:052. arXiv:1204.5678 [hep-ph]
  21. 21.
    Garzelli MV et al (2012) \(t{\bar{t}}\)\(W^{+1}\) and \(t{\bar{t}}\)Z Hadroproduction at NLO accuracy in QCD with parton shower and hadronization effects. JHEP 1211:056. arXiv:1208.2665 [hep-ph]
  22. 22.
    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Dittmaier S et al (2011) Handbook of LHC higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables. arXiv:1101.0593 [hep-ph]
  23. 23.
    Alwall J et al (2014) The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP 07:079. arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations