Advertisement

Data and Event Simulations

  • Daiki YamaguchiEmail author
Chapter
  • 59 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

In this section, the data and the simulation samples used in this analysis are described. To understand the observed data and search for new phenomena the comparison between data and simulation is essential. In the second part, the general methodology of the simulation is presented.

References

  1. 1.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2016) Search for new phenomena in \(t\bar{t}\) final states with additional heavy-flavour jets in 13.2 fb\(^{-1}\) of \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 13\) TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2016-104. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2220371
  2. 2.
    Lai H-L et al (2010) New parton distributions for collider physics. Phys Rev D 82:074024. arXiv:1007.2241 [hep-ph]
  3. 3.
    Ball RD et al (2013) Parton distributions with LHC data. Nucl Phys B 867:244. arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin AD et al (2009) Parton distributions for the LHC. Eur Phys J C63:189. arXiv:0901.0002 [hep-ph]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frixione S, Nason P, Ridolfi G (2007) A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction. JHEP 0709:126. arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nason P (2004) A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms. JHEP 0411:040. arXiv:hep-ph/0409146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frixione S, Nason P, Oleari C (2007) Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method. JHEP 0711:070. arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alioli S et al (2010) A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP 1006:043. arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]
  9. 9.
    Andersson B et al (1983) Parton fragmentation and string dynamics. Phys Rep 97:31ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sjostrand T (1984) Jet fragmentation of nearby partons. Nucl Phys B 248:469ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Webber B (1984) A QCD model for jet fragmentation including soft gluon interference. Nucl Phys B 238:492. ISSN: 0550-3213. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/055032138490333XADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marchesini G, Webber B (1988) Monte Carlo simulation of general hard processes with coherent QCD radiation. Nucl Phys B 310:461. ISSN: 0550-3213. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321388900892ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sjöstrand T, Mrenna S, Skands PZ (2006) PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual. JHEP 0605:026. arXiv:hep-ph/0603175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bahr M et al (2008) Herwig++ physics and manual. Eur Phys J C58:639. arXiv:0803.0883 [hep-ph]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agostinelli S et al (2003) GEANT4: a simulation toolkit. Nucl Instrum Meth A506:250ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ATLAS Collaboration (2010) The ATLAS simulation infrastructure. Eur Phys J C70:823. arXiv:1005.4568 [hep-ex]

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations