Abstract
The study is focused on analyzing and designing backfill retaining systems for a berth with respect to permissible deflection and overall consumption of concrete and steel. It includes analyzing and designing of RCC piled jetty with three types of earth retaining systems, namely slope fill (Type 1), diaphragm wall separate from the jetty (Type 2), cantilever wall attached to the jetty (Type 3), and with two different vessels of 5000 DWT (V1) and 3000 DWT (V2) under different site conditions. The different conditions consist of different water depth, different soil conditions (loose, medium, and hard), different seismic zone (II, III, IV, and V), and earth pressure for different backfill soil parameters and slope fill. The Axial force, Moments (My and Mz), and Concrete and Steel consumption are compared with respect to different water depths for all the zones and type of soils. The three systems are then compared against one another to find the most economical section. Also, the material consumption factor is found. It was observed that the slope fill (Type 1) and 9 m system are most suitable in terms of economy as a backfill retaining system for onshore RCC pile berth. With the change in soil from hard to loose, the pile diameter increases. Also as the width of jetty increases, in case of Type 1 system, the structure becomes less economical due to increased forces.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
IS 4651: 1974—Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours, Part 1: Site Investigation, Part 3: Loading
IS 4651 (Part 4): 2014—Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours—General design considerations (for load combinations)
IS 4651 (Part 5): 1980—Code of practice for planning and design of ports and harbours—Layout and functional requirements
IS 456: 2000—Plain and reinforced concrete code of practice
IS 875 (Part 3): 2015—Code of practice for wind loads on buildings and structures
IS 1893 (Part 1): 1984 & 2016—Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures—General provision and buildings
IS 2911 (Part 1): 2010—Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations (Concrete piles)
Shore Protection Manual by U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Centre
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dhavala, S., Shah, D., Kapasi, S. (2020). Comparative Study of Backfill Retaining Systems for Onshore RCC Pile Berth Under Different Site Conditions. In: Prashant, A., Sachan, A., Desai, C. (eds) Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 56. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0890-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0890-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0889-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0890-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)