Abstract
Earth retaining walls are the alleviating structures used to avert downward slope movement of earth masses and provide sustenance for vertical or near vertical grade changes. For designing these structures, it is necessary to regulate the earth pressure exerted by the soil behind the wall. But in seismic prone areas, retaining structures experience maximum devastation as dynamic loads are repetitive in nature. Mononobe–Okabe method based on pseudo-static approach gives an approximate value for the linear distribution of seismic earth pressure by considering the parameters like wall friction angle, soil friction angle, horizontal, and vertical seismic coefficients. The present work includes the determination of dynamic earth pressure coefficients by using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique. The effects of wide range of parameters like shear wave velocity, primary wave velocity, time effects, and phase difference on earth pressure coefficients have been studied. A comparison has been made between the pseudo-static and pseudo-dynamic earth pressure coefficients to highlight the realistic and nonlinearity nature of seismic active earth pressures. It is found that the horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations are more significant for the computation of dynamic earth pressure, which is highly sensitive to soil friction angle and less sensitive to wall friction angle. The results obtained in the proposed method are also compared with reported results, which show a good agreement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Das BM (1992) Principles of soil dynamics. PWS-Kent, Boston. Das BM (1993)
Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of Soil Mechanics. Wiley, New York, 700
Okabe S (1926) General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining walls and dams. J Jpn Soc Civil Eng 12–311
Mononobe N (1929) Earthquake proof construction of masonry dams. In: Proceedings of world engineering congress, international association of earthquake engineering, Tokyo, pp 9–275
Steedman RS, Zeng X (1990) The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall. Géotechnique 40(1):103–112
Choudhury D, Nimbalka S (2006) Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method. Geotechnique 55(9):699–702
Nanda B, Maity D, Maiti D (2013) Crack assessment in frame structures using modal data and unified particle swarm optimization technique. Adv Struct Eng 17(5):747–766
Kapila IP (1962) Earthquake resistance design of retaining walls 2nd earthquake symposium, University of Roorkee, India
Choudhury D, Nimbalka S (2006) Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall. Geotech Geol Eng 24:1103–1113
Mononobe N, Matsuo H (1929) On the determination of earth pressures during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the World Engineering Conference, vol 9, Pp176
Giri D (2014) Pseudo-dynamic methods for seismic passive earth pressure behind a cantilever retaining wall with inclined backfill. Geomech Geoeng 9(1):72–78
Acknowledgements
The work is a complete contribution of all the authors along with the corresponding author. This work is technically and financially supported by VSSUT, Burla, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Subhadarsini, S., Pradhan, S.P., Munda, J., Pradhan, P.K. (2020). A PSO-Based Estimation of Dynamic Earth Pressure Coefficients of a Rigid Retaining Wall. In: Prashant, A., Sachan, A., Desai, C. (eds) Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 56. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0890-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0890-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0889-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0890-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)