Skip to main content

Periodic Replacement Policies and Comparisons with Their Extended Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 754 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1102))

Abstract

It has been well known that minimal repairs are widely used in planning periodic replacement policies in reliability engineering. In this chapter, we begin with the standard periodic replacement policies that are planned at time T or at failure K, respectively, where the cumulative hazard function H(t) is used to count the number of minimal repairs. Next, three extensions of the above standard policies are discussed: (1) When the replacement policies of T and K are planned simultaneously, the approaches of first and last are used to make the best choice. (2) We delay replacement to be done at the first failure over T when it cannot be performed on time T. (3) We begin to plan replacement time T once the first failure or the Kth failure has occurred. We formulate the models of cost rates and give analytical discussions. In addition, comparisons are made for the above policies from point of cost. Finally, numerical examples are illustrated when the failure time has a Weibull distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakagawa, T.: Maintenance Theory of Reliability. Springer, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-221-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, R.E., Proschan, F.: Mathematical Theory of Reliability. Wiley, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Pulcini, G.: Mechanical reliability and maintenance models. In: Pham, H. (ed.) Handbook of Reliability Engineering, pp. 317–348. Springer, London (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-85233-841-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Chien, Y., Sheu, S.: Extended optimal age-replacement policy with minimal repair of a system subject to shocks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 174, 169–181 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huynh, K., Castro, I., Barros, A., Bérenguer, C.: Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218, 140–151 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim, J., Qu, J., Zuo, M.: Age replacement policy based on imperfect repair with random probability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 149, 24–33 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, W.: Optimum production and inspection modeling with minimal repair and rework considerations. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 1618–1626 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Park, M., Jung, K., Park, D.: Optimal post-warranty maintenance policy with repair time threshold for minimal repair. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 111, 147–153 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang, C.: Optimum preventive maintenance policies for systems subject to random working times, replacement, and minimal repair. Comput. Ind. Eng. 67, 185–194 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheu, S., Chang, C., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.: Optimal preventive maintenance and repair policies for multi-state systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 140, 78–87 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cha, J., Finkelstein, M.: On preventive maintenance under different assumptions on the failure/repair processes. Quality Reliab. Eng. Int. 34, 66–77 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuan, F., Kumar, U.: A general imperfect repair model considering time-dependent repair effectiveness. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 61, 95–100 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao, X., Al-Khalifa, K.N., Hamouda, A.M.S., Nakagawa, T.: First and last triggering event approaches for replacement with minimal repairs. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 65, 197–207 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao, X., Nakagawa, T.: Optimization problems of replacement first or last in reliability theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223, 141–149 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakagawa, T., Zhao, X.: Maintenance Overtime Policies in Reliability Theory. Springer, Switzerland (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20813-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 71801126), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (NO. BK20180412), Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (NO. 2018ZG52080), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NO. NR2018003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xufeng Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhao, X., Qian, C., Nakagawa, T. (2019). Periodic Replacement Policies and Comparisons with Their Extended Policies. In: Li, QL., Wang, J., Yu, HB. (eds) Stochastic Models in Reliability, Network Security and System Safety. JHC80 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1102. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0864-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0864-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0863-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0864-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics