Skip to main content

The Career Trajectory of ‘Men of Delivery’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Employment Legacy of the 2012 Olympic Games

Part of the book series: Mega Event Planning ((MEGAEP))

  • 340 Accesses

Abstract

As has been suggested, for a worldwide high-profile venture such as the Olympic Games, there is a pattern of prioritising of particular elites over the local workforce. In this chapter, I take this hypothesis empirically on trial through conducting interviews and LinkedIn examination to determine the career characteristics of those involved in running the 2012 Games, and its legacy through their occupational trajectories. The findings outline that at the professional level, working for the London Olympic Games 2012 meant being involved in an interwoven but dynamic network of worldwide experts in the performance of ‘non-routine’ tasks. Therefore, London 2012 was not only about testing the capabilities of athletes but was also a platform for manifesting the competence of experts and firms. The exercising of extreme caution in bringing the ‘right people’ on board in order to avoid any delivery risks resulted in an exclusive network based on ‘you know how’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Symbolic capital is a term used in sociological enterprise of Pierre Bourdieu (1989). His ideology has been discussed in theoretical framework in Chap. 4.

  2. 2.

    The ‘protean career’ is one in which a person manages their own career development by: (1) monitoring and assessing the job market; (2) anticipating future developments, trends and industry shifts, (3) gaining the necessary skills, qualifications, relationships and assets to meet these shifts, and (4) adapting in order to thrive in an ever-changing workplace (Block 2019; De Vos and Soens 2008).

  3. 3.

    Boundaryless careers, generally, are the opposite of organisational careers, that is, careers that move across the boundaries of separate employers.

  4. 4.

    Transnational global capitalist class (TCC or TNC) is that segment of the world economy that represents transnational capital, and is unconstrained by national boundaries (Sklair 2001). The transnational capitalist class is organized in four overlapping fractions: TNC executives, globalizing bureaucrats, politicians and professionals, consumerist (merchants and media) (Sklair 2001, p. 514).

References

  • Andranovich, G., et al. (2001). Olympic cities: lessons learned from mega-event politics. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(2), pp. 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (2019). The New Era of Protean Careers – Personal Branding Blog – Stand Out In Your Career. [online]. Available at: https://www.personalbrandingblog.com/the-new-era-of-protean-careers-2/ [Accessed 18 Nov. 2019].

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, S. (2009). BBC Programme Desert Island Discs.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, A. and Soens, N. (2008). Protean attitude and career success: The mediating role of self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), pp. 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2008). Before, during and after; making the most of the London 2012 Games. London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Scwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. (1997). The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G. (2004). Learning in projects, remembering in networks?: communality, sociality, and connectivity in project ecologies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(2), pp. 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G., and Thiel, J. (2015). Projects, people, professions: trajectories of learning through a mega-event (the London 2012 case). Geoforum, 65, pp. 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, H. H. (2000). Mega-events, urban boosterism and growth strategies: an analysis of the objectives and legitimations of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic Bid. International Journal of Urban Regional Research, 24(2), pp. 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation: an ideal form for managing complex products and systems?. Research Policy, 29(7–8), pp. 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London Assembly. (2010). Legacy limited? A review of the Olympic Park Legacy company’s role. London: Greater London Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, I., and Davies, A. (2011). Lessons learned from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games construction programme. Learning Legacy Research Summary. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130228091633/ http://learninglegacy.london2012.com/publications/lessons-learned-from-the-london-2012-olympic-and-paralym.php?stylesheet=normal. (Accessed 02 April 2012).

  • Mahroum, S. (2000). Highly skilled globetrotters: mapping the international migration of human capital. R&D Management, 30(1), pp. 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnaert, L. (2014). Making the Olympics work: interpreting diversity and inclusivity in employment and skills development pre-London 2012. Contemporary Social Science, 9(2), pp. 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2015). The mega-event syndrome: why so much goes wrong in mega-event planning and what to do about it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(1), pp. 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, B., and Kirkbride, L. T. (2001). Why businesses don’t employ people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16(2), pp. 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platman, K. (2004). Portfolio career and the search for flexibility in later life. Work, Employment and Society, 18(3), pp. 573–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M. (2014). Delivering flagship projects in an era of regulatory capitalism: state-led privatization and the London Olympics 2012. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(1), pp. 176–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raco, M., Street, E., and Freire-Trigo, S. (2016). The new localism, anti-political development machines, and the role of planning consultants: lessons from London’s South Bank. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), pp. 216–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (2001). Transnational capitalist class. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, T. (2012). London 2012 Olympics: the race of their lives. Management Today, 30(6), pp. 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, J., and Grabher, G. (2015). Crossing boundaries: exploring the London Olympics 2012 as a field-configuring event. Industry and Innovation, 22(3), pp. 229–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. R., and Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2006). Project-based firms: new organizational form or variations on a theme?. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), pp. 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vadiati, N. (2020). The Career Trajectory of ‘Men of Delivery’. In: The Employment Legacy of the 2012 Olympic Games. Mega Event Planning. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0598-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0598-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0597-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0598-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics