Advertisement

Agricultural Waste Derived 2nd Generation Ethanol Blended Diesel Fuel in India: A Perspective

  • Rabinder Singh BharjEmail author
  • Gurkamal Nain Singh
  • Rajan Kumar
Chapter
  • 265 Downloads
Part of the Energy, Environment, and Sustainability book series (ENENSU)

Abstract

The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy announced the National Biofuels Policy in 2009 to promote biofuels in India, and the Union Cabinet approved the National Biofuels Policy–2018 to succeed the existing policy from 2009. Biofuels have attracted worldwide attention over the past decade and it is imperative that biofuels be noticed to accelerate developments. It is noticed that the conversion of agricultural waste into 2nd generation ethanol has opened the door to unused resources and has promoted environmental sustainability. The 2nd generation ethanol, made from agricultural residues, offers significant prospective due to the extensive accessibility, abundance and comparatively inexpensive biomass. The use of agricultural waste to produce 2nd generation ethanol is proving to be a substitute source of energy for a narrow range of nonrenewable energy and food crops. Although this process has many challenges and limitations which are discussed in the chapter e.g. biomass transportation and handling, effective pretreatment methods, high costs based on current technologies that enable high efficiency and high process costs. The use of ethanol blended with diesel fuel has recently attracted the attention of many researchers. The usage of 2nd generation ethanol blended in diesel fuels will develop the agricultural commodity markets and create additional returns from 2nd generation ethanol derived from crop residues. The announcement by the Government of India on stringent emission regulations and the increased use of biofuels may lead to the use of 2nd generation ethanol blended with diesel fuel as a marketable fuel. This chapter highlights agricultural waste, its sources and various practices that include the processes undergone to produce 2nd generation ethanol economically, it also provides insight and suggests a renewable alternative fuel for diesel engines which will help in meeting the stringent emission standards.

Keywords

Air pollution 2nd generation ethanol Diesel engines Emission norms 

References

  1. Armas O, Mata C, Martinez-Martinez S (2012) Effect of an ethanol-diesel blend on a common-rail injection system. Int J Engine Res 13:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bioethanol Zeitz, Germany: CropEnergies AG. Available from: http://www.cropenergies.com/Pdf/en/Bioethanol/Produktionsverfahren.pdf?
  3. Cardona CA, Sánchez ÓJ (2007) Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol 98(12):2415–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherubini F (2010) GHG balances of bioenergy systems—overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns. Renew Energy 35(7):1565–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CSE (2010) Why is fodder so expensive? Down To Earth, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), New Delhi, 30th June 2010Google Scholar
  6. de Wit M, Junginger M, Lensink S, Londo M, Faaij A (2010) Competition between biofuels: modeling technological learning and cost reductions over time. Biomass Bioenergy 34(2):203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DENA (2006) Biomass to liquid—BTL implementation report (Executive Summary). BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisentraut A (2010) Sustainable production of second generation biofuels: potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries. International Energy Agency (IEA), ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. FIPI (2018) Voice of Indian oil & gas industry. J Fed Ind Petrol Ind 17(4)Google Scholar
  10. Ford H (1925) Ford predicts fuel from vegetation. New York Times 20(20):24Google Scholar
  11. Franco V, Sanchez FP, German J, Mock P (2014) Real-world exhaust emissions from modern diesel cars. Int Counc Clean TranspGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerdes KR, Suppes GJ (2001) Miscibility of ethanol in diesel fuels. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:949–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Girio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Lukasic R (2010) Hemicellulose Bioresour Technol 101:4775–4800Google Scholar
  14. GoI (2003) Report of the Committee on Development of Biofuels. Planning Commission, Government of India (GoI), New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, Zacchi G (2006) Bio-ethanol—the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 24(12):549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen AC, Vosloo AP, Lyne PWL, Meiring P (1982) Farmscale application of an ethanol–diesel blend. Agric Eng S Afr 16:50–53Google Scholar
  17. Hansen AC, Zhang Q, Lyne PWL (2005) Ethanol-diesel fuel blends—a review. Bioresour Technol 96:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashimoto I, Nakashima H, Komiyama K, Maeda Y, Hamaguchi H, Endo M, et al (1982) Diesel-ethanol fuel blends for heavy duty diesel engines-a study of performance and durability. SAE Technical paper; 1982Google Scholar
  19. Hegde NG (2010) Forage resource development in India. In: Souvenir of IGFRI Foundation Day, November 2010Google Scholar
  20. Howard R (2015) Up in the air: how to solve London’s air quality challenge. Policy ExchangeGoogle Scholar
  21. IEA (2009) Transport, energy and CO2: moving toward sustainability. International Energy Agency (IEA), ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. IEA (2011) Technology roadmap: biofuels for transport. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA-2016) Innovation Outlook: Advanced Liquid Biofuels. International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  24. IPCC (2007) Mitigation of climate change: technical summary. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. Ishizaki H, Hasumi K (2014) Ethanol production from biomass. In: Research Approaches to Sustainable Biomass Systems, pp 243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang Q, Appels L, Tan T, Dewil R (2004) Bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: current findings determines research priorities. Hindawi publishing coorpration. Sci World J 2014:1–13Google Scholar
  27. Kim JH, Block DE, Mills DA (2010) Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotype for efficient fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88(5):1077–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koonin S (2006) Getting serious about biofuels. Science 311:435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koshy J, Nambisan P (2012) Pretreatment of Agricultural waste with pleurotus sp for ethanol production. Int J Plant, Animal, Environ Sci 2:2Google Scholar
  30. Lapola D, Schaldach R, Alcamo J, Bondeau A, Koch J, Koelking C, Priess J (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(8):3388–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lapuerta M, Armas O, García-Contreras R (2007) Stability of diesel-bioethanol blends for use in diesel engines. Fuel 86:1351–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laybourn-Langton L, Quilter-Pinner H, Ho H (2016) Lethal and Illegal: solving London’s air pollution crisis. Institute for Public Policy ResearchGoogle Scholar
  33. Letcher TM (1983) Diesel blends for diesel-engines. S Afr J Sci 79:4–7Google Scholar
  34. Madson PW, Lococo DB (2000) Recovery of volatile products from dilute high-fouling process streams. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 84–86:1049–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maurya DP, Singla A, Negi S (2015) An overview of key pretreatment processes for biological conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol. Biotech 5(5):597–609Google Scholar
  36. MNRE (2009) National policy on biofuels. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), Government of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  37. MoA (2014) Agricultural statistics at a glance 2014, Government of India—ministry of agriculture, department of agriculture and co-operation, directorate of economics and statistics. Oxford University, New Delhi, ISBN 13: 978-0-19-945965-0Google Scholar
  38. MoEF (2010) India: greenhouse gas emissions 2007. Indian Network for Climate Change Assessment (INVVA), Ministry of Environment, Forests and climate Change (MoEFCC), New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  39. Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):578–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Policy on Biofuels, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas (4th June, 2018), New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  41. NNFCC and the Low Carbon Vehicles Partnership (Low CVP) (2010) Pathways to UK Biofuels: a guide to existing and future transport biofuelsGoogle Scholar
  42. Olsson L, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1996) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb Technol 18(5):312–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pandey A, Biswas S, Sukumaran RK, Kaushik N (2009) Study on availability of Indian biomass resources for exploitation: a report based on a nationwide survey. TIFAC, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  44. Pandey R, Sar SK, Bhui AK (2012) Feasibility of installing rice husk power plant in Chhattisgarh to meet sustainable energy demands. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 1(4):57–60Google Scholar
  45. Patel S, Onkarappa R, Shobha K (2006) Study of ethanol production from fungal retreated wheat and rice straw. Int J Microbiol 4(1)Google Scholar
  46. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21) Renewable 2016- Global Status ReportGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma SP (2010) Mini-thermal power projects turning unviable in Malwa Raw material, agriculture waste, prohibitively expensive. Tribune News Service, Bathinda, 20th December 2010Google Scholar
  48. Shie JL, Chang CY, Chen CS, Shaw DG, Chen YH, Kuan WH, Ma HK (2011) Energy life cycle assessment of rice straw bio-energy derived from potential gasification technologies. Biores Technol 102(12):6735–6741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shinoj P, Raju SS, Joshi PK (2011) India’s biofuels production programme: need for prioritizing alternative options. Indian J Agric Sci 81(5):391–397Google Scholar
  50. Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M (2010) An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Biores Technol 101(6):1570–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh GN, Bharj RS (2019) Study of physical-chemical properties for 2nd generation ethanol-blended diesel fuel in India. Sustain Chem Pharm 12:100130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Torres-Jimenez E, Jerman MS, Gregorc A, Lisec I, Dorado MP, Kegl B (2011) Physical and chemical properties of ethanol-diesel fuel blends. Fuel 90:795–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webb A, Coates D (2012) Biofuels and biodiversity. CBD Tech Ser 65:69Google Scholar
  54. Wiesenthal I, Leduc G, Christidis P, Schade B, Pelkmans L, Govaerts L, Georgopoulos P (2009) Biofuel support policies in Europe: lessons learnt for the long way ahead. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(4):789–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yadav JP, Singh BR (2011) Study on future prospects of power Generation by bagasse, rice husk and municipal waste in Uttar Pradesh. SAMRIDDHI-J Phys Sci 2(2):63–75MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  56. Zabaniotou A, Ioannidou O, Skoulou V (2008) Rapeseed residues utilization for energy and second generation biofuels. Fuel 87(8–9):1492–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rabinder Singh Bharj
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gurkamal Nain Singh
    • 1
  • Rajan Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology JalandharJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations