Gender-Powered Approaches

  • Reihana MohideenEmail author


A basic engineering approach is to find an optimal solution in the face of the complexity of the overall problem, that is, finding an approximation of the reality, or the optimality, in order to pose the problem neatly and then solve it. Social systems and societal impacts, however, are complex and non-linear. Interdisciplinary approaches are needed to evaluate impacts on gender equity, such as the impact of energy systems on women’s health, livelihoods, employment and other societal impacts.

Multiple pathways to address gender equity through energy have been identified. Evidence suggests that small-scale infrastructure projects, such as mini-grids, are more conducive than large-scale conventional energy projects to improving access to services by the poor, providing greater opportunities for participation by women and other marginalized groups.


Technology Engineering Gender and development Capabilities Solar energy Cook stoves Feminist Multiple pathways 


  1. ActionAid and Oil Change International. 2011. Access to Energy for the Poor: The Clean Energy Option. Available at
  2. Akrich, M. 1992. The De-scription of Technical Objects. In Shaping Technology/Building Society, Studies in Socio-technical Change, ed. Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2012. Gender Tool Kit: Energy Going Beyond the Meter. Manila.
  4. Bijker, W.E., and J. Law, eds. 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cecelski, Elizabeth. 1992. Women, Energy and Environment: Some Directions for Policy Research. Toronto, ON: International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2000. The Role of Women in Sustainable Energy Development, 3–5. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, US Department of Energy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow, J., R.J. Kopp, and P.R. Portney. 2003. Energy Resources and Global Development. Science 302 (5650): 1528–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clancy, J., et al. 2012. Social Influences on Gender Equity in Access to and Benefit from Energy. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equity and Development Background Paper, pp. 12–21.Google Scholar
  9. Ergas, Christina, and Richard York. 2012. Women’s Status and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Quantitative Cross-national Analysis. Social Science Research 41 (4): 965–976. Scholar
  10. Grubler, A. 2012. Grand Designs: Historical Patterns and Future Scenarios of Energy Technological Change. Historical Case Studies of Energy Technology Innovation. In The Global Energy Assessment, ed. F. Aguayo et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Haraway, D. 1985. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65–108.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan__Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. International Energy Agency. 2013. World Energy Outlook.Google Scholar
  14. International Rivers. 2012. Infrastructure for Whom? A Critique of the Infrastructure Strategies of the Group of 20 and the World Bank. International Rivers, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobsen, J. 2011. The Role of Technological Change in Increasing Gender Equity with a Focus on Information and Communications Technology. World Bank. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equity and Development: Background Paper, p. 8 and pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  16. Kelkar, Govind. 2010. Adivasi Women Engaging with Climate Change. Energia News, May.Google Scholar
  17. Kelkar, Govind, and Dev Nathan. 2005. Gender Relations and the Energy Transition in Rural Asia. Energia 8 (2): 17–25.Google Scholar
  18. Lerman, N., R. Oldenziel, and A. Mohun. 2003. Gender and Technology: A Reader. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lim, S., et al. 2012. A Comparative Risk Assessment of Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor Clusters in 21 Regions, 1990–2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380: 2224–2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Massé, R. 2003. Impacts of Rural Electrification on Poverty and Gender in Sri Lanka. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Masud, J., D. Sharan, and B. Lohani. 2007. Energy for All: Addressing the Energy, Environment, and Poverty Nexus in Asia. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  22. McGraw, J. 1996. Why Feminine Technologies Matter. In Gender and Technology: A Reader, ed. N. Lerman, R. Oldenziel, and A. Mohun. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mohideen, R. 2013. Improving Poor Women’s Quality of Life through Access to Clean and Renewable Energy in South Asia. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE. September.Google Scholar
  24. Moss, J., and M. McGann. 2011. Climate Change and Energy Poverty in Timor-Leste. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Melbourne Energy Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen, Amartya. 1979. Equality of What? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Delivered at Stanford University, May 22.Google Scholar
  28. Skutsch, M. 1998. The Gender Issue in Energy Project Planning: Welfare, Empowerment or Efficiency? Energy Policy 26 (12): 945–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2005. Gender Analysis for Energy Projects and Programmes. Energy for Sustainable Development 9 (1): 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smil, V. 2003. Chapter 2: Energy Linkages. In Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2006. Transforming the Twentieth Century: Technical Innovations and Their Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. UNDP. 2004. Gender & Energy for Sustainable Development: A Toolkit and Resource Guide. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
  33. Verzola, Robert. 2007. Crafting a Sustainable Energy Program for the Philippines. Philippine Greens.
  34. Wajcman, J. 2010. Feminist Theories of Technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 34 (1): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations