Skip to main content

Social Contract and Beyond: Sociability, Reciprocity and Tax Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Taxation

Abstract

Paying taxes, as determined by the legislature, is a moral obligation owed by members of a community to their community. Question is whether paying taxes has become an exclusively legal affair: a legal obligation towards the state, replacing a moral obligation towards society. This chapter tries to find an answer to that question by analysing social contract theorists and their critics. Social contract theorists and their critics searched for principles underlying a viable civil polity. Hobbes, Spinoza and Hume focused on political and legal authority and obedience; grounding their theories on various ideas regarding human motivations and human sociability. These different starting points resulted in diverging conceptions of the reciprocal relationships between ruler and subjects and between subjects and fellow subjects. We will show the consequences thereof for the relationship between tax law and morality. Different conceptions of the reciprocal relationships involved may invite behaviour varying from minimalist compliance to a more liberal compliance with tax law. Taxpayers facing absolute sovereignty may adopt a legalistic attitude relying on the letter of the law or exploiting loopholes rather than stay within the spirit of applicable tax legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See also Jackson (1973), who distinguishes between prudential maxims and moral rules.

  2. 2.

    John Hampden refused to pay the ship-money, a levy for naval support, which “in its fatally controversial form took shape after 1634” (Braddick 2019, 31).

  3. 3.

    As for compliance with tax obligations, this may refer to the following kinds of obligations: (1) registration in the system; (2) timely filing or lodgement of requisite taxation information; (3) reporting of complete and accurate information (incorporating good record keeping); and (4) payment of taxation obligations on time; OECD (2014).

  4. 4.

    Spinoza does not identify the right and power; see Curley (1996), 318–322, also for a useful comparison with Hobbes.

  5. 5.

    Here terms such as passions and emotions, and natural inclinations are sometimes used in lieu of the more technical-philosophical term ‘affects’ because a precise equivalent in our spoken language is lacking. For Spinoza’s affects can be passive and active, but in the TP Spinoza does not apply this distinction consistently.

  6. 6.

    This does not necessarily go harmoniously, conflict between human beings being the inevitable (Lloyd 1996, 75).

  7. 7.

    Kisner calls this the second natural law. Spinoza himself defines ‘benevolence’ in a different way: ‘the desire to benefit those whom we pity (E3, Definitions of the Emotions, no. 35).

  8. 8.

    Cf Fuller’s view of law as a purposive enterprise (Fuller 1977, 145 ff.).

References

  • Ashcraft, Richard. 2006. Locke’s Political Philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Vere Chappell, 226–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Annette. 1993. David Hume, Spinozist. Hume Studies 19 (2): 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Annette. 2010a. The Cautious, Jealous Virtue: Hume on Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, Annette. 2010b. Reflections on How We Live. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom. 2002. Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belaief, Gail. 1971. Spinoza’s Philosophy of Law. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskes, Chris. 2006. Evolutionair denken: de invloed van Darwin op ons wereldbeeld. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Two Concepts of Liberty. 1958. In Four Essays on Liberty, ed. Isaiah Berlin, 118–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund Larsen, Lotta. 2018. A Fair Share of Tax: A Fiscal Anthropology of Contemporary Sweden. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, Hans. 1993. The Moral and Political Philosophy of Spinoza. In The Renaissance and Seventeenth-century Rationalism, ed. G.H.R. Parkinson, 313–348. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto. 1989. Democracy and Dictatorship Minneapolis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, David, and Paul Kelly. 1994. The Social Contract and its Critics: An Overview. In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, ed. David Boucher and Paul Kelly, 1–34. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddick, Michael J. 2019. Case of Ship-Money (R v. Hampden) (1637). Prerogatival Discretion in Emergency Conditions. In Landmark Cases in Revenue Law, ed. John Snape, and Dominic de Cogan, 27–47. Oxford & Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, Allison. 2009. Sovereignty, Taxation and Social Contract. Minnesota Journal of International Law 18 (1): 99–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, Rachel. 2008. Hume’s Morality: Feeling and Fabrication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Thomas, J. 2007. Spinoza’s Ethics. London & New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, Diana. 1994. Women, Gender and Contract: Feminist Interpretations. In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, ed. David Boucher and Paul Kelly, 191–210. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curley, Edwin. 1994. Introduction. In Leviathan. E. Curley, ed. Thomas Hobbes, i–lxxvii. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, Edwin. 1996. Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan. In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Don Garrett, 315–342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, Richard. 2010. One of the Finest and Most Subtle Inventions: Hume on Government. In A Companion to Hume, ed. Elizabeth Radcliffe, 388–405. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dijn, Herman. 1970. Ervaring en theorie in de staatkunde. Een analyse van Spinoza’s “Tractatus Politicus”. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 32 (1): 30–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • d’Entrèves, Alessandre Passerin. 1967. The Notion of the State. An Introduction to Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyzenhaus, David. 1980. Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law. Law and Philosophy 20: 461–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyzenhaus, David. 2014. The Public Conscience of the Law: Hobbes, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Conscience, Legality, Liberty. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (2): 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enachescu, Janina, and Erich Kirchler. 2018. The Slippery Slope Framework of Tax Behaviour: Reviewed and Revised. In Tax and Trust Institutions: Interactions and Instruments, ed. Sjoerd Goslinga et al., 87–119. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewin, R.E. 1991. Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder, San Francisco & Oxford: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, Murray. 1994. Hobbes’s Contractarianism: A Comparative Analysis. In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, ed. David Boucher and Paul Kelly, 35–50. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Daniel, and Jason Waller. 2016. Spinoza on Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, W. 1967. Legal Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Lon L. 1977. The Morality of Law. [1964] New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Don. 1996. Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Don Garrett, 267–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatens, Moira, and Geneviève Lloyd. 1999. Collective Imaginings: Spinoza, Past and Present London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David. 1979. David Hume, Contractarian. The Philosophical Review 88 (1): 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gert, Bernard. 1996. Hobbes’s Psychology. In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell, 157–174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M.M. 1994. Liberty, Virtue and the Rule of Law. In Republicanism, Liberty, and Commercial Society 1649–1776, ed. David Wootton, 198–232. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M.M. 1996. Hobbes on Law. In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell, 274–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greengrass, Mark. 2014. Christendom Destroyed: Europe 1517–1648. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayling, A.C. 2016. The Age of Genius: The Seventeenth Century and the Birth of the Modern Mind. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, Hans. 2011. Lex. In The Continuum Companion to Spinoza, ed. Wiep van Bunge et al. 235–239. London & New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, Hans. 2015a. Corporate Social Responsibility and Tax Planning: Not by Rules Alone. Social & Legal Studies 24 (2): 225–250. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2610090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, Hans. 2015b. Taxation, Reciprocity and Communicative Regulation. Tilburg Law Review 20: 191–212; http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2676067 2015b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, Hans. 2015c. The Power of Law: Spinoza’s Contribution to Legal Theory. In Spinoza and Law, ed. Andre Santos Campos, 21–37. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, Hans. 2017. The Integrity of the Tax System after BEPS: A Shared Responsibility. Erasmus Law Review 10 (1): 12–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, Hans, and Carl Dijkstra. 2019. Contractualism and Tax Governance: Hobbes and Hume. In Studies in the History of Tax Law. Volume 8, ed. Peter Harris, and Dominic de Cogan. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing 2019, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Harold. 1974. Tax Philosophers: Two Hundred Years of Thought in Great Britain and the United States. Madison: WUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Ross. 2012. The Equal Extent of Natural and Civil Law. In Hobbes and the Law, ed. David Dyzenhaus and Thomas Poole, 22–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, Knud. 1981. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henley, Kenneth. 2012. Hume’s ‘Wilt Chamberlain Argument’ and Taxation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1): 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1990. Behemoth or The Long Parliament, ed. F. Tönnies. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1991a. Man and Citizen (De Homine and De Cive), ed. Bernard Gert. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1991b. Leviathan. Or the Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiastical and Civill [1651], ed. Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. On the Citizen [1642/1651], ed. Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Stephen. 1990. Introduction. In Thomas Hobbes. Behemoth or the Long Parliament, ed. F. Tönnies, i-l. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honoré, Tony. 1993. The Dependence of Morality on Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, and P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1985. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1998. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Dudley. 1973. Thomas Hobbes’ Theory of Taxation. Political Studies 21 (2): 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Susan. 2012. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaume, Lucien. 2007. Hobbes and the Philosophical Origins of Liberalism. In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg, 199–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, Erich, Erik Hoelzl, and Ingrid Wahl. 2008. Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The “Slippery Slope” Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishlansky, Marc. 1996. A Monarchy Transformed: Britain 1603–1714. London: Allan Lane/The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisner, Matthew J. 2011. Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, Wim. 2013. Thomas Hobbes over de stilte van de wet: vertrouwen en de ethiek van tax compliance. Tijdschrift Fiscaal Recht: 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letwin, Shirley R. 2005. On the History of the Idea of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, Geneviève. 1996. Spinoza, Past and the Ethics. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobban, Micheal. 2012. Thomas Hobbes and the Common Law. In Hobbes and the Law, ed. David Dyzenhaus and Thomas Poole, 19–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. 2008. Two Treatises of Government (rev. edn.), ed. P. Laslett [1698]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, Beth. 2017. Spinoza on Natural Inequality and the Fiction of Moral Equality. In Reassessing Radical Enlightenment, ed. Steffen Ducheyne, 127–142. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, John. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Rights and Wrong. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Noel. 1991. Hobbes and Spinoza. In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, ed. J.H. Burns, 530–557. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Noel (ed.). 2007. Reason of State, Propaganda, and the Thirty Years’ War: An Unknown Translation by Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martel, Yann. 2002. Life of Pi. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, Aloysius P. 1997. Thomas Hobbes. Houndmills & London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, Aloysius P. 1999. Hobbes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Michelle. 2005. Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason. Hume Studies 31 (2): 347–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, Alexandre. 1986. Spinoza et le pouvoir. In Anthropologie et politique au XVIIe siècle (Etudes sur Spinoza). Alexandre Matheron, 103–122. Paris: VRIN.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, Neil. 2007. David Hume’s Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, Larry. 2013. Limiting Leviathan: Hobbes on Law and International Affairs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, John S. 1996. A History of Western Political Thought. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, Arthur P. 1994. From Personal Duties towards Personal Rights: Late Medieval and Early Modern Thought, 1300–1600. Toronto: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Christopher W. 1999. Introduction. In The Social Contract Theorists: Critical Essays on Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau, ed. Christopher W. Morris, ix–xi. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, Steven. 2006. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, Steven. 2014. The Lives of Others: Spinoza on Benevolence as a Rational Virtue. In Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory, ed. Matthew J. Kisner and Andrew Youpa, 41–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, Glen. 2014. The Routledge Guidebook to Hobbes’ Leviathan. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, David. 1993a. An Introduction to Hume’s Thought. In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, ed. David Norton, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, David. 1993b. Hume, Human Nature, and the Foundations of Morality. In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, ed. David Norton, 148–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1999. The Rule of Law. In On History and Other Essays, ed. Michael Oakeshott, 119–164. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2014. Managing and Improving Tax Compliance. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pangle, Thomas L. 1973. Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism. A Commentary on the Spirit of Laws. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peczenik, Alexander. 1989. On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penelhum, Terence. 1993. Hume’s Moral Psychology. In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, ed. David Norton, 117–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. 1967. Hobbes. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, [1956].

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Roy. 2000. The Creation of the Modern World: The Untold Story of the British Enlightenment. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Communicative Power and the Concept of Law In Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, ed. Michael Rosenfeld, and Andrew Arato, 323–335. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (rev. edn.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, Patrick. 1982. Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau and Hegel. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Paul. 1995. Freedom and Moral Sentiments: Hume’s Way of Naturalizing Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Alan. 1996. Hobbes’s Political Philosophy In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell, 208–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Alan. 2012. On Politics: Book II. New York & London: Liveright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar, Paul. 2018. Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos Campos, Andre. 2012. Spinoza’s Revolutions in Natural Law. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneewind, Jerome. 2006. Locke’s Moral Philosophy. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Vere Chappell, 199–225. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Peter. 2015. The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Ian. 1986. The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, Judith. N. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeaff, Christoph. 2018. Becoming Political: Spinoza’s Vital Republicanism and the Democratic Power of Judgment. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Volume II. The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, John. 2015. David Hume: Philosophical Historian of Tax Law. In Studies in the History of Tax Law. Studies in the History of Tax Law. Volume 7, ed. Peter Harris and Dominic de Cogan, 421–464. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, Jordan. 2009. Walls and Vaults: A Natural Science of Morals: Virtue Ethics According to David Hume. Hoboken: John Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, Johann P. 1986. Politics and Ideology in England, 1604–1640. London & New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellman, William M. 1998. European Political Thought 1600–1700. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza. 2002. Ethics. In Spinoza, Complete Works. trans. S. Shirley, 213–382. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza. 1989. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. trans. S. Shirley. Leiden: E.J. Brill 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza. 2000. Political Treatise. trans. S. Shirley. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza, 2002. The Letters. In Spinoza, Complete Works. trans. S. Shirley, 755–960. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hacket.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springborg, Patricia. 2007. Introduction. In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Steedhar, Susanne. 2012. Private judgment. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hobbes, ed. Sharon A. Lloyd, 198–210. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 2018. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Jacqueline. 2015. Sympathy, Self and Others. In The Cambridge Companion to Hume’s Treatise, ed. Donald Ainslie and Annemarie Butler, 188–205. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno, Osamu. 1991. Spinoza et le paradoxe du contrat social de Hobbes, “Le reste”. Cahiers Spinoza 6: 269–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodraska, Stanley. 2002. Hume’s Moral Enquiry: An Analysis of its Catalogue. In David Hume—Critical Assessments, vol. IV, ed. Stanley Tweyman, 188–205. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 1994. John Locke: Social Contract versus Political Anthropology. In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, ed. David Boucher and Paul Kelly, 51–72. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, Manfred. 1985. Die Transformation des Naturrechts in der Rechtsphilosophie Spinozas. Studia Spinozana 1: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, Manfred. 2006. Grundzüge politischen Philosophie Spinozas. In Baruch de Spinoza: Ethik in geometrischer Ordnung dargestellt, ed. Micheal Hampe and Robert Schnepf, 214–236. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, JWN. 1973. Hobbes’ System of Ideas. London: Hutchinson & Co [1965].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, John. 2012. Theory and Practice in the Philosophy of David Hume. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Sheldon S. 2004. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton, David. 2018. Power, Pleasure, and Profit: Insatiable Appetites from Machiavelli to Madison. Cambridge, MA & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden, Blair. 2009. The English Civil Wars 1640–1660. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Gribnau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gribnau, H., Dijkstra, C. (2020). Social Contract and Beyond: Sociability, Reciprocity and Tax Ethics. In: van Brederode, R. (eds) Ethics and Taxation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0088-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0089-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics