Skip to main content

The Moral Basis for Taxation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethics and Taxation

Abstract

This chapter attempts to consider some of the major moral issues involved in the imposition of taxation. It assumes prima facie that the rationale nowadays for a government imposing taxation derives from its responsibility to raise revenue for providing public goods, redistributing income/wealth to those who are in need or less well-off, promoting social and economic welfare, promoting economic stability, and creating a sound infrastructure for the development of business; and possibly, promoting fiscal harmonisation with other countries. These ideas suggest that the provision of public goods and services paid for by tax revenue inherently constitutes the moral basis for imposing taxation. The chapter goes on to examine definitions of ‘tax’ and ‘morality’, noting the development of morality as concept that changes over time, often subject to increased scientific knowledge, and continues by considering in depth the link between property and taxation, examining property rights, the concept of the ‘social contract’ and natural rights, the meaning of private property, and the idea of ‘tax as theft’—looking at in this latter context the ideas of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, together with libertarian and counter-libertarian arguments. The chapter then considers further the moral underpinning for the process of raising taxes and their use, examining in detail the ideas of Green (J Religious Ethics 12(2):146–161, 1984). The final sections offer some other possible viewpoints and concluding remarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter explores in more depth ideas broached earlier in a more general overview of the morality of taxation (see Frecknall-Hughes 2017).

  2. 2.

    Attitudes towards the morality and acceptability of tax avoidance have, however, differed over time—see (Bainbridge 2017; Bank 2017; Frecknall-Hughes 2014). There is a wide range of both UK and US case law demonstrating the change in attitudes over the years.

  3. 3.

    Basing tax so as to fund public goods/services on a populace’s willingness to pay for the benefits received (the benefit principle), is generally attributed to Knut Wicksell and Erik Lindahl of the Stockholm school of economic thought, but is implicit in, for example, the ideas expressed much earlier in Part 2 of Paine’s 1792 Rights of Man, where he discusses in detail the use of tax revenues (in terms of paying the armed services, funding government administration expenses, pensions, children’s education and various kinds of poor reliefs) and how that may be raised—arguably one of the first expositions of the precise (social) uses of taxation (see the discussion in Frecknall-Hughes 2007).

  4. 4.

    The following example is taken verbatim from Frecknall-Hughes (2014, 5).

  5. 5.

    The most recent review of the UK tax system.

  6. 6.

    There are several taxes, such as the Christian tithe and the Islamic zakat, which are paid to religious bodies, often voluntarily, although certain countries allow religious bodies to assess tithes.

  7. 7.

    The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights do not, however, recognise property rights.

  8. 8.

    See Waldron (1996, 2011) for an exposition of property rights from a legal and philosophical point of view. While there is no scope in this chapter to consider the development of property rights and law, these are particular to individual nations and societies and have developed differently. Many different philosophers have considered property issues, for example, Plato, Aristotle, Grotius, Pufendorf, Hobbes, Locke, Hume, Smith, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, Bentham, Mill, Nozick and Rawls, as Waldron (1996, 11) comments.

  9. 9.

    See Frecknall-Hughes and Oats (2007, 2004) for a discussion of scutage and other medieval taxes. It is notable that the estates of persons in England and Wales who die intestate and without heirs still revert to the Crown or the Duchies of Cornwall or Lancaster (both royal duchies), depending on the place in which a deceased person has resided.

  10. 10.

    There are different forms of this, as the concept was espoused by many different thinkers, such as Grotius, Pufendorf, Hobbes, Rousseau and Kant.

  11. 11.

    See Finn (2011, 494), who comments that Aquinas endorses “personal ownership because it is efficient but, at the same time, insists on the ‘common use’ of property, because in creation God intends that the material goods of the earth meet everyone’s needs. This teaching has been reaffirmed and extended institutionally by all of the modern papal social encyclicals. Pope John Paul II clearly advocated governments raising taxes to ensure, for example, ‘in every case the necessary minimum support of the unemployed worker’”, citing John Paul II, Centesimus Annus 15.

  12. 12.

    Cap. 13, lec. 1, ad 13:6, following Meredith (2008, 43) and endnote 4, on 54.

  13. 13.

    Per Meredith (2008, 43) and endnote 5, on 54, in a letter from Aquinas to the Duchess of Brabant.

  14. 14.

    Cap. 13, lec. 1, ad 13:6, following Meredith (2008, 43) and endnote 4, on 54.

  15. 15.

    Citing In Romanos, cap. 13, lec. 1, ad 13:7, and Summa Theologia, II–II, Q. 62, art. 7, responsio.

  16. 16.

    See, however, Vallentyne’s (2018) discussion of libertarian views on taxation, which reveals a wide range of nuances of thought, including instances where “it is just to tax those who infringe libertarian rights for the reasonable costs of enforcement provided by the state” (2018, 109).

  17. 17.

    This argument, however, does not consider the difference between ‘ownership’ and ‘jurisdiction’.

  18. 18.

    Meredith’s comments (2008, 44) that Aquinas’s vision of just taxation does not include “any notion of a duty on the part of the prince to direct tax revenues to provision for the physical needs of the poor or to redistribute the wealth of the more affluent members of the community to those of limited means”. He comments further that writers who favour redistribution do not typically engage with Aquinas’s writings. One of the few writers who looks at Aquinas through the lens of distributive justice is Finnis (1998), and Meredith’s article disagrees with Finnis’s interpretation of Aquinas on various aspects associated with redistribution.

  19. 19.

    Green draws a distinction between “negative” freedom and “positive” freedom, with the latter meaning “freedom to achieve one’s ends without being hindered by various natural obstacles or forces, including those within the self” (1984, 149).

  20. 20.

    See later as regards Rawls’s version of distributive justice.

  21. 21.

    The Salvation Army, for example, is second only to the government in the UK in terms of the provision of social services.

  22. 22.

    One of the entries under Taxation in Vitullo-Martin and Moskin (1994, 279).

References

  • Augustine of Hippo. 413–418. City of God, London, trans. H. Bettenson, London: Penguin Books Ltd (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1265–1274. Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, available at http://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/1225-1274,_Thomas_Aquinas,_Summa_Theologiae_%5B1%5D,_EN.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2018.

  • Bainbridge, Stephen. 2017. Is Tax Avoidance Immoral? A Catholic Lay Perspective. ProfessorBainbridge.com, Stephen Bainbridge’s Journal of Law, Religion, Politics, and Culture, at http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2017/09/is-tax-avoidance-immoral-a-catholic-lay-perspective.html. Accessed 11 Sep 2017.

  • Bank, Steven A. 2017. When Did Tax Avoidance Become Respectable? Tax Law Review 123–177. UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 17–15, at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3014985. Accessed 13 Feb 2018.

  • Barford, Vanessa, and Gerry Holt. 2012. Google, Amazon, Starbucks: The Rise of “Tax Shaming”, at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-20560359. Accessed 29 Dec 2012.

  • Baron, Richard. 2012. The Ethics of Taxation. Philosophy Now, Issue 90, at https://philosophynow.org/issues/90/The_Ethics_of_Taxation. Accessed 16 May 2017.

  • Bentham, Jeremy. no date. Anarchical Fallacies. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Volume 2, ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait (1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. no date. General View of a Complete Code of Laws. In The Works of Jeremy Bentham Volume 3 (1838), ed. John Bowring. New York: Russell & Russell Inc., 1962 reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1793. Supply Without Burden or Escheat Vice Taxation. In Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings, ed. Werner Stark, vol. 1, 1952–1954. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biron, Laura. 2018. Taxing or Taking? Property Rhetoric and the Justice of Taxation. In Taxation: Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Martin O’Neill, and Stepley Orr, 81–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blankson, Samuel. 2007. A Brief History of Taxation. USA: Lulu Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Walter J., and Harry Kalven Jr. 1952. The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation. University of Chicago Law Review 19 (3): 417–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey. 2005. The Myth of Ownership. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30: 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey. 2018. Striving for the Middle Ground: Taxation, Justice and the Status of Private Rights. In Taxation: Philosophical Perspectives, ed. Martin O’Neill, and Stepley Or, 60–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burg, David F. 2004. A World History of Tax Rebellions. An Encyclopedia of Tax Rebels, Revolts, and Riots from Antiquity to the Present. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorov, Frank. 1947. Tax is Robbery, Mises Institute, at https://mises.org/library/taxation-robbery. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

  • Cohen, Gerald A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cullis, John G., Philip R. Jones, and Oliver Morrissey. 1993. The Charge of the Tax Brigade. A Case Study of Government Failure and Tax Reforms. European Journal of Political Economy 9 (3): 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daunton, Martin. 2001. Trusting Leviathan: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dome, Takuo. 1999. Bentham and J.S. Mill on Tax Reform. Utilitas 11 (3): 320–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Elaine, Jane Frecknall-Hughes, and Barbara Summers. 2014. Ethics in Tax Practice: A Study of the Effect of Practitioner Firm Size. Journal of Business Ethics 122 (4): 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, Francis Y. 1925. Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. II. Royal Economic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Richard A. 1986. Taxation in a Lockean World. Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1): 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Convention on Human Rights. 2010. European Court of Human Rights, at https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  • Feser, Edward. 2000. Taxation, Forced Labor, and Theft. Independent Review 5 (2): 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, Daniel K. 2011. Nine Libertarian Heresies Tempting Neoconservative Catholics to Stray from Catholic Social Thought. Journal of Markets and Morality 14 (2): 487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, John. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frecknall-Hughes, Jane. 2007. The Concept of Taxation and the Age of Enlightenment. In Studies in the History of Tax Law II, ed. Tiley, John, 253–286. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frecknall-Hughes, Jane. 2014. The Theory, Principles and Management of Taxation: An Introduction. Oxford: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frecknall-Hughes, Jane. 2017. Who Has the Right to Pluck the Goose? TLS-Online, 9 June, at http://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/right-pluck-goose/.

  • Frecknall-Hughes, Jane, and Lynne M. Oats. 2004. John Lackland: A Fiscal Re-evaluation. In Studies in the History of Tax Law ed. Tiley, John, 201–226. Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frecknall-Hughes, Jane, and Lynne M. Oats. 2007. King John’s Tax Innovations—Extortion. Resistance and the Establishment of the Principle of Taxation by Consent, Accounting Historians Journal 34 (2): 75–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Ronald M. 1984. Ethics and Taxation: A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (2): 146–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Harold M. 1948. Trouble Spots in Taxation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Harold M. 1974. Tax Philosophers, ed. Curran, Donald J. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Dennis. 1985. The Evolution of the Property Tax: A Study of the Relation between Public Finance and Political Theory. Journal of Politics 47 (2): 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Michael W. 2012. Book Review, Liam Murphy and Thomas Nagel, ‘The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice’. Basic Income Studies 7 (1), Article 9 (4 pages), https://doi.org/10.1515/1932-0183.1210.

  • Huemer, Michael. 2017. Is Taxation Theft? At https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/is-taxation-theft. Accessed 16 May 2017.

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. United Nations, at https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  • International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966. United Nations, at https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  • James, Simon. 2012a. A Dictionary of Taxation, 2nd ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, Simon. 2012b. The contribution of behavioral economics to tax reform in the United Kingdom. Journal of Socio-Economics 41 (4): 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Simon, and Christopher Nobes. 2012. The Economics of Taxation, 12th ed. Birmingham: Fiscal Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Samuel. 1775. Taxation No Tyranny: An Answer to the Resolutions and Address of the American Congress. In The Works of Samuel Johnson, vol. 14, Troy, NY (1913), 93–144. Pafraets & Company; at www.samueljohnson.com. Accessed 4 May 2004.

  • Johnson, Dave. 2017. Tax Cuts Are Theft. HuffPost, December 6, at https://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson/tax-cuts-are-theft_b_675731.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

  • Kearl, James R. 1977. Do Entitlements Imply that Taxation is Theft? Philosophy & Public Affairs 7 (1): 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krouse, Sarah, and Sophie Baker. 2012. Osborne clamps down on tax abuse. Financial News, at http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2012-03-21/osborne-clamps-down-on-tax-abuse-in-budget. Accessed 29 Dec 2012.

  • Locke, John. 1690. Second Treatise of Government, in Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government: A Critical Edition with Introduction and Notes, 2nd ed, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, Christopher T. 2008. The Ethical Basis for Taxation in the Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Journal of Markets and Morality 11 (1): 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1848. Principles of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green & Co (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirrlees, James. 2011. Tax by Design: The Mirrlees Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Adam D. 2018. Taxation, Forced Labor and Theft, at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=3165611 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3165611. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

  • Murphy, Liam, and Thomas Nagel. 2002. The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Richard. 2007. A Code of Conduct for Taxation. Basildon, Essex: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, William. 2015. In Reluctant Defence of the Internal Revenue Service. Heythrop Journal, at https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12297. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Martin, and Stepley Orr (eds.). 2018. Taxation: Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary. no date. Tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press, at www.oed.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk (via subscription). Accessed 11 Apr 2011.

  • Paine, Thomas. 1792. The Rights of Man, Part the Second, at www.infidels.org/library/historical/thomas_paine/rights_of_man/part2.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2004.

  • Rand, Ayn. 1973. Government Financing in a Free Society. In Economic Justice, ed. Phelps, Edmund, S., 529–537. New York: Macmillan/Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas. 1966. Social Justice. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, David. 1817. Principles of Political Economy. (1951). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 1982. The Ethics of Liberty. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, Dorothy L. 1933. Murder Must Advertise. London: New English Library Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Stephen. 2017. Tax Cuts are Theft. HuffPost, May 25, at https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tax-cuts-are-theft_us_59272b5ae4b03296e2d11326. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

  • Sirico, Robert A. 2007. Mandated Giving Doesn’t Come from the Heart. Religion and Liberty 17 (4): 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Chicago: William Benton, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Peter. 1991. Lessons From the British Poll Tax Disaster. National Tax Journal 44 (4, Part 2): 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snape, John, and Jane Frecknall-Hughes. 2017. John Locke: Property, Tax and the Private Sphere. In Studies in the History of Tax Law VIII, ed. Harris, Peter A., and Dominic de Cogan, 1–35. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner, Lysander. 1867. No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, published by the author, at http://www.freedomforallseasons.org/TaxFreedomEmail/LysanderSpoonerNoTreason.pdf. Accessed 25 Sep 2018.

  • Stewart, Miranda. 2005. Taxes and Justice in Context. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30: 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tame, Chris R. 1989. Taxation is Theft. Political Notes No. 44. London: Libertarian Alliance. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), United Nations, at http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  • Vallentyne, Peter. 2018. Libertarianism and Taxation. In Taxation: Philosophical Perspectives, ed. O’Neill, Martin, and Stepley Orr, 98–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vitullo-Martin, Julia, and J. Robert Moskin (eds.). 1994. Executive’s Book of Quotations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 1996. Property Law. In A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, ed. Patterson, Dennis M., 3–23. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 2011. The Right to Private Property. Oxford Scholarship Online, at www.oxfordscholarship.com. Accessed 31 Aug 2018.

  • Williams, Walter, E. 2008. Government Theft, American-style. WorldNetDaily, August 6, at https://www.wnd.com/2008/08/71517/. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane Frecknall-Hughes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frecknall-Hughes, J. (2020). The Moral Basis for Taxation. In: van Brederode, R. (eds) Ethics and Taxation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0089-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0088-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0089-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics