Skip to main content

Mathematical Analysis of Image Information Retained in the Complex Domain Phases Under Additive and Multiplicative Noise

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computing and Data Sciences (ICACDS 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1046))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1657 Accesses

Abstract

It is often observed that phases in complex transform of images are important ingredients compared to their magnitude for information extraction. Literature indicates that these phases are immune to noise. The aim of this paper is to find the structural (Edge) and statistical information retained by the complex domain phases for the images corrupted with additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and multiplicative (speckle) noise. Initially, we measure the edge information preserved by both phase and magnitude only synthesized image using edge mismatch error (EMM), to illustrate the significance of phase in image restoration and reconstruction. A mathematical model for the sensitivity of phase and magnitude is derived to examine the respective rate of deterioration under varying noise strength. Both the mathematical finding and experimental results indicate that the phase of any complex transform is degraded slowly compared to its magnitude. Comparative analysis of effect of noise on these phases is also investigated and reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In our earlier work a comparative analysis on different phases reveal the importance of phase based reconstruction over magnitude based reconstruction [9].

  2. 2.

    The phase only reconstructed image was synthesized from the phase of respective transform (such as FT, CWT and CT) with unity magnitude. Similarly, the magnitude only reconstructed image was synthesized by preserving magnitude information with unity phase.

References

  1. Kingsbury, N.: Image processing with complex wavelets. Philos. Transact. Royal Soc. London A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 357(1760), 2543–2560 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma, J., Plonka, G.: The curvelet transform. Signal Process. Mag. IEEE 27(2), 118–133 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, R., Lauzon, M.L., Frayne, R., et al.: A general description of linear time-frequency transforms and formulation of a fast, invertible transform that samples the continuous s-transform spectrum nonredundantly. Signal Process. IEEE Transact. 58(1), 281–290 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Selesnick, I.W., Baraniuk, R.G., Kingsbury, N.C.: The dual-tree complex wavelet transform. Signal Process. Mag. IEEE 22(6), 123–151 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Candes, E., Demanet, L., Donoho, D., Ying, L.: Fast discrete curvelet transforms. Multiscale Model. Simul. 5(3), 861–899 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Stockwell, R.G., Mansinha, L., Lowe, R.: Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. Signal Process. IEEE Transact. 44(4), 998–1001 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovesi, P.: Phase preserving denoising of images. Signal 49(3), 1 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oppenheim, A.V., Lim, J.S.: The importance of phase in signals. Proc. IEEE 69(5), 529–541 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Panigrahi, S.K., Gupta, S.: Quantitative evaluation of image information retention by relative phases. In: 2013 Students Conference on Engineering and Systems (SCES), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Panigrahi, S.K., Gupta, S., Sahu, P.K.: Phases under Gaussian additive noise. In: 2016 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), pp. 1771–1776. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Torralba, A., Oliva, A.: Statistics of natural image categories. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 14(3), 391–412 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kovesi, P.: Phase congruency detects corners and edges. In: The Australian Pattern Recognition Society Conference, DICTA 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zitova, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 21(11), 977–1000 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka, H., Yoshida, Y., Fukami, K., Nakano, H.: Texture segmentation using amplitude and phase information of Gabor filters. Electron. Commun. Jpn. Part III Fundam. Electron. Sci. 87(4), 66–79 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, S., Panigrahi, S.K.: Joint bilateral filter for signal recovery from phase preserved curvelet coefficients for image denoising. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.05512 (2018)

  16. Panigrahi, S.K., Gupta, S., Sahu, P.K.: Curvelet-based multiscale denoising using non-local means & guided image filter. IET Image Process. 12(6), 909–918 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buades, A., Coll, B., Morel, J.M.: On image denoising methods. CMLA Preprint, vol. 5 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao, Y., Liu, J.G., Zhang, B., Hong, W., Wu, Y.-R.: Adaptive total variation regularization based sar image despeckling and despeckling evaluation index. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 53(5), 2765–2774 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Skarbnik, N., Zeevi, Y.Y., Sagiv, C.: The importance of phase in image processing. Ph.D. thesis, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morrone, M.C., Owens, R.A.: Feature detection from local energy. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 6(5), 303–313 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Panigrahi, S.K., Gupta, S.: Automatic ranking of image thresholding techniques using consensus of ground truth. Traitement du Signal 35(2), 121 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sezgin, M., et al.: Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J. Electron. Imaging 13(1), 146–168 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellegrino, F.A., Vanzella, W., Torre, V.: Edge detection revisited. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. IEEE Transact. 34(3), 1500–1518 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., Malik, J.: A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In: Proceedings of Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2001, ICCV 2001, vol. 2, pp. 416–423. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., Perona, P.: Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 106(1), 59–70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nordstrøm, M.M., Larsen, M., Sierakowski, J., Stegmann, M.B.: The imm face database-an annotated dataset of 240 face images. Technical report Technical University of Denmark, DTU Informatics, Building 321 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Zelensky, A., Egiazarian, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F.: Tid2008-a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Adv. Mod. Radioelectr. 10(4), 30–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shao, H., Svoboda, T., Van Gool, L.: Zubud-zurich buildings database forimage based recognition. Computer Vision Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland, Technical Report, vol. 260 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Richards, M.A.: The discrete-time Fourier transform and discrete Fourier transform of windowed stationary white noise. Technical Memorandum, November 2013

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. Image Process. IEEE Transact. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susant Kumar Panigrahi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Panigrahi, S.K., Gupta, S. (2019). Mathematical Analysis of Image Information Retained in the Complex Domain Phases Under Additive and Multiplicative Noise. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T., Kashyap, R. (eds) Advances in Computing and Data Sciences. ICACDS 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1046. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9942-8_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9942-8_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9941-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9942-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics